More Evil at the Hands of Robert Mugabe

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampfox
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

swampfox

Guest
Zimbabwe turns to wildlife as food source print friendly version

author/source:Pretoria News (SA)
published:Wed 27-Apr-2005
posted on this site:Wed 27-Apr-2005

President Robert Mugabe’s regime has directed national parks officials to kill animals in state-owned conservation areas to feed hungry rural peasants - a move that could wipe out what remains of Zimbabwe’s impalas, kudus, giraffes, elephants and other species. The directive is a major blow to efforts by conservationists to try to rehabilitate the wildlife sector which was devastated after Mugabe ordered his supporters to invade and confiscate white-owned farms in 2000. The chaotic farm invasions saw party militants storming into conservation areas - both private and state-owned - to slaughter animals. Unscrupulous South African hunters also joined in the looting, paying hefty kickbacks to politicians to go into conservation areas and shoot lions, leopards and cheetahs for trophies. But because of the general abundance of certain species of wildlife in southern Zimbabwe and the establishment of the transfrontier park, which allows animals from Mozambique and South Africa’s world-famous Kruger National Park to move freely into and out of Zimbabwe’s Gonarezhou (home of the elephants) National Park, there have been high hopes among conservationists that Zimbabwe’s wildlife sector could be restored to its former glory.

This now appears highly unlikely as Zimbabwe’s department of national parks and wildlife management, the custodian of this embattled country’s wild animals, has been given the green light to work with rural district councils to kill animals to feed more than four-million hungry rural Zimbabweans. National Parks officials said the recent shootings of 10 elephants for barbecue meat at festivities to mark Zimbabwe’s 25 years of independence around the country had been carried out in the broad context of the directive to kill animals to feed the hungry, particularly those living within the vicinity of national parks. The 10 elephants were killed by National Park rangers. Four of the giant animals were reportedly shot in full view of tourists near Zimbabwe’s Lake Kariba, a major haven for wildlife. Zimbabwean conservationists have been particularly scathing about the killings of the elephants for independence celebrations. Rural peasants in Zimbabwe have sold or fed on their own livestock in the past three years of unprecedented hunger, induced by Mugabe’s chaotic land seizures.

National Parks officials say many of the peasants living in areas bordering National Parks have already been venturing into these parks to hunt and kill animals using snares. But they said the impact of snare hunting by the villagers was limited compared to what would happen if armed National Parks rangers were allowed to enter conservation areas to kill for meat to feed millions of hungry peasants. “Killing of animals for any reasons other than conservation can be very disastrous,” said one National Parks official. “The politicians think we have enough animals to feed people without wiping out different species. We as professionals don’t think so. We are talking to them (the politicians) and we hope we will reach consensus on protecting our wildlife heritage.” Other government officials said Mugabe was so happy about his rural constituency which ensured him a majority of seats in last month’s parliamentary elections that he wanted to do everything to please the peasants.
 
40.png
swampfox:
President Robert Mugabe’s regime has directed national parks officials to kill animals in state-owned conservation areas to feed hungry rural peasants - .
I don’t know much about this situation except what I read here, but let me make a couple of comments:

1. If these people are really starving, why does not the U.S. and the rich Western countries lend assistance.

2. Why do not conservationists push these governemnts to help and also donate their own funds?

3. If animals were not being killed would these same people be concerned about the people who were starving?
 
Wasn’t this one of the most prosperous countries in Africa when it was controlled by the evil Europeans? Was there ever a starvation problem? Certainly evils and inequities existed before but they were nothing compared to what has occurred under Mugabe. Whites have been murdered and their property seized and the native population is now starving because of it. The country obviously has the natural resources to be self-supporting, even prosperous, but something has to be done internally. Shoveling outside aid at the problem is a stopgap measure at best. What is needed is a strong and honest leader who will retrieve and reinstitute the good things from their recent past rather than rejecting it all as has been done by their current weak and corrupt leadership.
 
40.png
geezerbob:
Wasn’t this one of the most prosperous countries in Africa when it was controlled by the evil Europeans? Was there ever a starvation problem? Certainly evils and inequities existed before but they were nothing compared to what has occurred under Mugabe. Whites have been murdered and their property seized and the native population is now starving because of it. The country obviously has the natural resources to be self-supporting, even prosperous, but something has to be done internally. Shoveling outside aid at the problem is a stopgap measure at best. What is needed is a strong and honest leader who will retrieve and reinstitute the good things from their recent past rather than rejecting it all as has been done by their current weak and corrupt leadership.
**Yes, but what do you propose we do RIGHT NOW to prevent innocent men, women, and children from starving? Is your term “Shoveling outside aid at the problem is a stopgap measure” the equivalent of saying “Providing essential food so these poor people don’t die”? **
 
Of course I’m for feeding starving people. However, my point was that providing food for the hungry is not a long-term solution for the problems that exist there. I did not mean to imply that we (the rest of the world) should not help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top