More "found" bible texts

  • Thread starter Thread starter DustThouArt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
All sorts of texts that aren’t authentic out there.

I wonder when they say forbidden if they mean simply not part of the Canon
 
Many possible responses here. The Canon of Scripture is closed. I’ve heard that unapproved manuscripts WERE destroyed, as much as could be determined, but maybe not this one.

Saw a show about the gospel of Mary Magdalene – about 3 inches by 4 inches. a fragment that asserts that she and Jesus were married.

If Jesus had been married, I don’t think there would be any reason to hide it. This subject, however, trails off to that of the “bloodline of Jesus Christ.”

Recall that St. Paul says that if anyone, even an angel, were to bring a ‘gospel’ different from his teaching, it was to be rejected.

In the Jewish Study Bible (Oxford U), there is an essay about the dead sea scrolls that demonstrates that there were preserved three full variants of Jewish / Hebrew writings. Only as an observation from a non-qualified person: The Septuagint holds the scriptures which the Jews themselves considered important to translate into Greek and to distribute to Jews in the Diaspora who no longer could read the scriptures in the original language. That sort of nails down the scope of possible texts for canonization (although not all of the Septuagint was accepted by the Catholic Church). The Orthodox Churches preserve the Septuagint but they have not issued a statement on canonicity. For a long time, they did not read from the book of Revelation, although it seems to have gained later acceptance. The OC relies heavily on tradition and so they just pass on what they received.
 
@Kei

If this is a Gnostic writing with “secret” information as the article describes it then it would have been a heretical writing. There are many non-canonical writings that are orthodox that just did not make it into the Bible. The First Letter of Clement to the Corinthians (AD 96 or there abouts) comes to mind. It is considered orthodox and was in fact read in the Church at Corinth for about a century after it was written.

Blessings
 
Last edited:
From the description in the link it sounds like a version of an already known Gnostic work. There are lots of them. “The Missing Gospels” by Bock goes thru 26 of them. Easy to see why they didn’t make the cannon.

Blessings,
Stephie
 
Last edited:
Well, even the Gnostics probably had some non-objectionable apocryphal works. It’s just that nobody invited those authors to the really cool parties.

Orthodox apocryphal works are fun. I like the one where Peter resurrects the dried fish, and I like the one with the Greek family reunion/travelogue sandwiched into a bunch of sermons of Peter against Simon Magus. I mean, what’s not to like? They’re obviously not Scripture, but they aren’t misleading people, either.
 
Yes, but “forbidden” is so exciting and daring, and by extension, the person reading them becomes exciting and daring
 
That’s one of the “lures” of those works. It’s pretty easy to find them on line as .pdf files. Fun reading, but you DO have to be careful. For instance, one of the 114 verses/chapters of “The Gospel of Thomas” has the render to Caesar what is Caesars, and to God what is God’s, but adds the phrase and to me what is mine. You have to think very carefully why that addition is just wrong.

Blessings,
Stephie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top