More Fr. Levis on Altar Girls

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nota_Bene
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

Nota_Bene

Guest
Some additional insights on the issue of altar girls by the Reverend Father Robert Levis, Ph.D.

Question from David C. Manning on 11-14-2004: I don’t know if this is a doctrinal or liturgical matter; I haven’t been a Roman Catholic long enough to fully understand the dividing line. However, since the following has become urgent and controversial in our parish, I hope you will respond to this, even if it’s strictly liturgical. For thirty years, our parish has run a very successful, all-boy altar servers’ program. Recently, this has borne fruit in one new vocation - the new priest now is serving a parish in Sacramento, California - and one boy who presently is actively considering the priesthood.

Two years ago, we acquired a new priest who describes himself as “a Catholic liberal”. Recently, he moved unilaterally to integrate our altar boys’ program. His actions have resulted in the program’s near-decimation. Some parents have pulled their boys out; other boys have quit on their own. So, here’s my question: Where the Vatican is concerned, my understanding is that, in a recent encyclical or some other directive, it discouraged the practice of female altar servers. If this is correct, where may I find this in writing? If it isn’t correct, what is the official position of the Church on this contentious matter?

Answer by Fr. Robert J. Levis on 11-15-2004: Dear David, This post is excellent in particularizing my fears of the phenomenon of girl servers, i.e. young boys don’t want to serve with girls, and we lose the potential for recruitment for the Priesthood. To my limited knowledge, Rome’s official permission is to accept the servcies of the girls, the local pastor being willing. I am unaware at this time of any further official stance. Fr. Bob Levis

Yet another nugget of wisdom:

Question from Jay Koch on 11-19-2004: I appreciate David Manning’s concern about female altar servers. David, I have been a Catholic since childhood (many years). I welcome altar girls. They represent over fifty percent of the population of the United States (gender-wise), and they represent countless thousands of women who have served Christ in His Church, either as religious or laypersons throughout the centuries.

Nowhere in the NT does Jesus dicriminate against the female gender. In fact, He had broken the barriers of discrimation against them in a strongly patriarchal society. As we contemplate the role of women in the Church, we cannot help but recall that, at the foot of the cross were two women and one man, St. John. This gender ratio is often representative of the actual number of Catholics who have been, and are active in the Christian apostolate, either as laypersons or religious. Blessings, David.

Answer by Fr. Robert J. Levis on 11-23-2004: Dear David, Time will tell the fruits of the use of girl altar servers today. I suspect such results will not be hopeful in the issue of seminarians for the Priesthood. Aware of this major break with Tradition, both of the Old Testament, as well as of the past 200 centuries of Catholicism, we must be humble in our assessement of the good or bad results of this major liturgical experimentation. Fr. Bob Levis
 
beleiveing as I do that priests should consult with the laity of the parish and that certain matters are best left to the local community so that they may respond as is best in their situation, the situation in Mr. Manning’s parish certainly seems unfortunate (as reported). Though I will say one vocation in thirty years (with the hope for one more) does not seem like the strongest case for exclusively treating the altar server program as a vocations awareness opportunity is warrented.

Of course, hundreds of parishes, including my own, successfully use both girls, boys with potential vocations and boys not oriented towards the priesthood.

As to if this is a “major” liturgical experimentation, I would suggest at one time using parish boys rather than actual acolytes was a greater experiment.
 
Yes, that was the thing that also caught my eye–that in 30 years of a successful all-boys altar server program, the parish generated only ONE vocation! While I realize that in the past, serving at the altar has nurtured many vocations, that certainly doesn’t sound like a great recommendation for the program. I suspect that there’s something missing at that parish that’s not connected to the altar servers.

In my own diocese there have been both boy and girl altar servers for about five years now, and yet we do continue to have a good number of seminarians and ordinands.
 
God bless you, Jim. You make the case for the current discipline of local option. My best wishes to you and your community.
 
Nota Bene:
**
Two years ago, we acquired a new priest who describes himself as “a Catholic liberal”. Recently, he moved unilaterally to integrate our altar boys’ program. His actions have resulted in the program’s near-decimation. Some parents have pulled their boys out; other boys have quit on their own. **

Of course many people dismiss or disregard this statement.

When can we make boys something special?
 
My Daughter is an altar sevrer. In fact a little over half of the servers in our parish are girls. It works well.
 
Just a little addition for everyone to think about…
From this website…
rtforum.org/lt/lt88.html

" This idea of altar service as basically a stage along the road to the priesthood is still reflected not only visually by the fact that altar servers dress like priests, in cassock and surplice, but also linguistically in the terminology used in some languages. In Spanish, for example, an altar boy is called a monaguillo, which etymologically means “a little monk”. And in Italian the word for altar boy is chierichetto - a “little cleric”, which means that the term coined by the Italians for female altar servers is in itself an affront to Catholic doctrine: they are called donne chierichetto, “little female clerics”. But, of course, it is Catholic doctrine that females cannot become clerics (that is, in the post-conciliar sacramental disposition, bishops, priests or deacons)."

Some things are experiments. Even when sanctioned by the Vatican. In our post Vatican II church, things are changed and then changed back. Like the idea of Reconcilliation after First Holy Communion. It was allowed to be abused for a while, then was corrected. Understanding that Rome frowned on Altar girls for a long time, then gave the okay does not mean that it will not change back in another time. This is not dogma.
 
netmil(name removed by moderator):
" This idea of altar service as basically a stage along the road to the priesthood is still reflected not only visually by the fact that altar servers dress like priests, in cassock and surplice,
the cassock is an adaptation of the academic dress. That is why you also see it worn by seminarians (students) and choir members (schola). The surplice is a watering down of the alb. The alb symbolizes baptism – it is the same garment as the white baptismal robe (christening dress for infants).
but also linguistically in the terminology used in some languages. In Spanish, for example, an altar boy is called a monaguillo, which etymologically means “a little monk”.
An interesting point, but we are not bound my folkloric terms.
And in Italian the word for altar boy is chierichetto - a “little cleric”, which means that the term coined by the Italians for female altar servers is in itself an affront to Catholic doctrine: they are called donne chierichetto, “little female clerics”. But, of course, it is Catholic doctrine that females cannot become clerics (that is, in the post-conciliar sacramental disposition, bishops, priests or deacons)."
Except the Italian term pre-dates the Council and women can (and have) been made clerics in the canonical sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top