Diana, I like how because you believe it, it is so. While calling me a liar all at once.
acluutah.org/03legreport.htm
"Alcoholic Beverage Amendments: SB 153 Passed
As reported by the Salt Lake Tribune on February 3, 2003: “A few months ago, a select group of insiders began the politically perilous task of revamping Utah’s liquor laws. Three major interests were represented: the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, the hospitality industry and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
While the content of the liquor law amendments have been controversial and will have a significant impact on clubs and micro-breweries, ACLU constitutional concerns were based upon any violations of open meetings laws. **The public was concerned that no other religious or non-business public groups were invited to participate in the drafting of at least the basic concepts of the new law. **
Apparently in an effort to avoid the issue of illegal meetings, which the DABC has admitted to in the past, no more than two commissioners were ever present at these initial meetings. A GRAMA request for records revealed no explicit evidence of technical wrongdoing on the part of the DABC. The public, however, was once again less than inspired when apprised of the “process.”