Mormon Conference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rose74
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rose74

Guest
My husband is a former mormon. Watching the conference always reminds him why he left. I find it so devoid of any meaningful content; some trite personal anecdote followed by some general Mormon style scripture for emphasis. Any former Mormons still watch it?
 
My husband is a former mormon. Watching the conference always reminds him why he left. I find it so devoid of any meaningful content; some trite personal anecdote followed by some general Mormon style scripture for emphasis. Any former Mormons still watch it?
I usually do…am not today
 
My husband is a former mormon. Watching the conference always reminds him why he left. I find it so devoid of any meaningful content; some trite personal anecdote followed by some general Mormon style scripture for emphasis. Any former Mormons still watch it?
I’m not a former Mormon but I tried wo watch the last one out of curiosity. I woke up about two hours later. I have truly never witnessed aything so mundane in my life. :yawn:
 
I’m not a former Mormon but I tried wo watch the last one out of curiosity. I woke up about two hours later. I have truly never witnessed aything so mundane in my life. :yawn:
They all sound the same. The same tone. The same cadence. It is a little spooky.
 
I tried watching a few years back. I turned it off right when their choir sang about joe smith mingling with gods in heaven 😦
 
General Conference is primarily a bunch of pep talks to the Mormon lay faithful by their general leadership.

On occasion new temples, and new general leaders are announced or new policies.
 
My husband is a former mormon. Watching the conference always reminds him why he left. I find it so devoid of any meaningful content; some trite personal anecdote followed by some general Mormon style scripture for emphasis. Any former Mormons still watch it?
Well I’m not a former Mormon (at least not yet), though I am strongly questioning everything at the moment, and I watch General Conference. Today I saw the first session, then went to the NY Auto Show after :p. I’ll watch the second session probably later tonight, then I’ll probably watch some of the Sunday sessions tomorrow when they broadcast, and the rest of it later on.

Firstly, I think that GC is sometimes hard to watch all the way through. It is a very long conference! I don’t think that most people can sit and watch it all at once. I’m usually doing something else while it’s on in the background, and I think that’s a common practice. Last year, I went over to a friend’s place, and we were all making brunch, and had GC on at the same time. I think that this is a common practice. Most people probably end up watching it later on (they archive it online), or reading the addresses given in the Ensign (a Church magazine) the following month, or reading the addresses online. They then take notes in their journals or whatever on how they can apply the principles taught to their lives. Like I mentioned, I’ll usually have it airing in the background while I’m doing something else, will tune in/start fully paying attention when a hymn I like comes on or an address on a topic of interest to me comes up, and that’s about it. When the magazine with all of the addresses comes out, I highlight the titles of the talks that are of interest to me, and I read them periodically. Again, I think that’s a common practice, since it honestly is hard to pay attention for 4-6 hours a day, whatever the topic may be (this isn’t LDS specific, IMO).

As for General Conference itself, again, in my opinion, and without talking about actual doctrinal matters that may be brought up (today, I was somewhat amused when a speaker, I forgot who, started saying something about us being children of the Father, stopped when he said “Fa…”, then said “Heavenly Parents”, which was amusing and interesting to me), I do appreciate the concept of General Conference. I enjoy having this type of gathering of the worldwide church, wherever it may be, the music by the Mormon Tabernacle Choir and other choirs that perform, and I do appreciate the leadership of the church, and others, giving talks/addresses on various gospel-related topics (usually the same topics in different ways, such as marriage, repentance, the priesthood, the gospel, temples, personal revelation, prayer, the atonement of Jesus Christ, etc) and issues (again, I’m not saying I appreciate hearing specifically about LDS-related topics, I just appreciate hearing leadership of a church talking about such things in this sort of setting), especially how it relates to life (which is the typical LDS approach to such things, whether it’s in class, Sacrament Meeting, in a manual, etc). I think that the sort of addresses given fall into the category of “inspiration”, like when you go to the bookstore and see the Christian Inspiration section. There won’t be anything hardcore, scriptural exegesis, college level, etc (i.e the “meat”).

So, without commenting on doctrinal matters or the truthfulness (or lack thereof) of the LDS Church, I do appreciate the concept of General Conference, and think that most take the approach that I outlined above when they get into GC. There is nothing ground-breaking to GC each Conference (there are 2 a year). They talk about the same topics, just in a different way. So when a friend of mine asked how it was (he only saw part of it), I just said “meh, just more of the same”. 😃

Oh and I tend to agree with Marie when she says they are “pep talks”, at least in a sense. The addresses usually remind everyone about repentance, the [alleged] truthfulness of the restored church and the gospel, the blessings that come from “choosing the right”/following Christ, families forever, etc, things that we should be doing anyway, but tend to forget or have a hard time with, so lots of people will talk about how they feel “renewed” after GC, even though again, nothing fundamentally new is revealed or talked about (this isn’t like the “old days” with profound revelations and such…and yes, the 15 will be sustained as “prophets, seers, and revelators” tomorrow, yet we all await to see the exercising of such gifts).
 
I very much enjoyed listening to when the Tabernacle choir would sing during some of the sessions. I had only been LDS a few months when then elect president Reagan dubbed them "America 's choir " in '81.
I can pick out their distinctive and beautiful choral sound to this day.

I agree with your statement that for many of the lay Mormon faithful, general conference tends to re -engerize them and they tend to re -commit themselves to being faithful. But alsolike you said, they tend to take it in chunks and mainly wait for the conference issue of the Ensign to come out.

Of course with the Internet these days, they don’t have to wait that long
 
How can you watch this conference on tv? Is their a special dish you have to buy?
 
i never watch it, but being in UT, i see it on the tv when i channel surf. I’m sure i’ll see a bunch of high lights tomorrow at work. those old folks love their conference!

i’m not entirely tuned out to it…i see alot of messages my friends will post on Facebook. some are good, some i don’t care for, some i just shake my head over it. its near impossible to get away from conference weekend here. i try to avoid it like the plague.

the choir, though, have great voices. i took a choir class in high school, and one of the singers was our teacher. great voice.
 
I’ve never seen it. I am just glad you are Catholic! Go Jesus!!! :D:D:D
 
the choir, though, have great voices. i took a choir class in high school, and one of the singers was our teacher. great voice.
That’s cool. 🙂
When I lived in UT, I took in the choir’s Christmas concert several times when they were using the old oval tabernacle. M.a.g.n.i.f.i.c.a.n.t. acoustics!! that building. The concerts were spectacular. And when they would preform the “Allelujah” from the “Messiah” would make my hair stand on end it was so stirring

With the conference center, not sure if they use that building much. Pity. The tabernacle really is a marvel…
 
I do get BYUTV through dishnet and I watched a little. Everyone is right, it is boring and reminded me of sacrament meeting “talks”.
 
They are very careful to appear mainstream. I only heard a couple of slips.

One was one of the female speakers call9ng God an Exalted Being.

I can’t remember the other. I will have to wait till I can read them.
 
In today’s Sunday afternoon session, there was a speaker that talked about the Godhead. While I wasn’t paying complete attention, and will have to read it when they publish the transcript, here are a few things I noticed:

-LDS continue to not understand that the traditional Trinity doctrine is not modalism. The traditional Trinity clearly teaches the distinction of Persons, where the Father is not the Son or the Spirit, the Son is not the Father nor the Spirit, and the Holy Spirit is not the Father nor the Son. Yes, I know that many traditional Christians themselves fall into this error, and conflate the Persons when they try to emphasize the unity of the Persons, but it must be remembered that the Trinity teaches that the Persons are distinct from each other in a way that is different from the way they are One. Or, as many, such as Frank Sheed (Theology and Sanity) say, the Persons are the “who” and the “substance/essence/nature” is the “what”.

-LDS, perhaps in common with most, don’t understand that the word “being” is used in a technical way in the Trinity doctrine that is not the same as how we use it in everyday language (especially when we understand that the Trinity was not formalized in an English-speaking world). This causes LDS and traditional Christians to talk passed each other when talking about the number of “beings” involved in their respective beliefs.

-LDS seem to have a form of Binitarianism, where the Father and the Son are emphasized when talking about an issue, yet the Holy Ghost is not referred to within the same breath. For example, it is quite common to say that the Father and the Son are separate beings. But isn’t the Holy Ghost believed to be as well? Why not include the Holy Ghost in while you’re mentioning the other two Persons? This is very common.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top