To the topic this thread was opened to discuss…
I must state my support of many of the postings from people saying that the most offensive part of this whole event perpatrated by these three young men taking pictures of their acts at this shrine is their disregard for what another faith, my Catholic faith, holds to be sacred; the altar inside the shrine.
I find it very unbelievable that anyone that has the least bit of understanding of religion would not recognize that the best thing to do if you are in a church you don’t belong to, it act in the very best manner you can.
A lot has been said on both sides about whether these young men are guilty or not. This is somehting ultimately that the courst, if they become involved, would decide legally, but I find that with their own self-incrimination at least of the one individual that was captioned in the original posting of these pictures on the internet as having broken the head off, we must say they are at the most generous guilty of something. If they did not in fact break the head off, we have to at least say they are guilty of a very public lie.
I have yet, though, to see any public statement from any of these three saying that the statemtent that one of them broke the head off the statue was untruthful. If, you were accused of doing something you did not, and accused by your own lie, perhaps told you thought in jest, would you not attempt to set the record straight?
Now, as regards the claims of sacrelige when these young men preached fromt the altar, and then pretended to sacrfice one of the men on the altar. I will go as far as to say that while I find it very offensive to me, because I know the significance of an altar in a Catholic church or shrine, I am not going to go as far as to accuse these boys of sacrilege, because I can’t interpret their own hearts. If they knew the significance of the altar, and what it represents, then they were sacrilegious in their behavior around and on that altar. Being that they are Mormon, and possibly never learned a single thing about the Catholic Church (something I strongly doubt would be true, though they may have learned things that aren’t true about the Catholic Church), I will not accuse them of sacrilege. Similar to the prerequisites that something be a mortal sin, I feel that sacrilege requires the full knowledge and cooperatioin with the sacrilegious act. If they had not the knowledge that the altar is a sacred object, set aside for everyday use by its consecration to it use as an altar, and they did not have full cooperation with the act they were doing (unlikely, since they did it, and I don’t see how they could have been coerced into it), then what they did is still gravely offensive, but not, in the cirumstance I described, necessarily sacreligious.
I will ask the same thing a numbe of others have asked. Has anyone seen any statement from the other two missionaries involved in this?
May God’s love shine out through your (and my) actions.
Albert