Mormon straw men

  • Thread starter Thread starter teancum79
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The more I read and learn about the LDS the More I realize how Blessed I am To be Catholic. I also see that as one of the ways to know that it is a man made religion. It just keeps getting more and more complicated.
You don’t think that catholicism is complicated? It is very complicated.
uh yeah catholicism is anything but simple. Thats not a bad thing, but it is complex.
I think of the doctrines of the two religions like I was looking at a pile of puzzle pieces. But there is a big difference. The Catholic Church can put its pile of pieces together and make a pretty picture. When a Mormon is asked to put its pieces together it almost never happens. After watching them try for awhile, we usually hear something like this:
We never claim to provide “evidence” for the truth of Mormonism, except the testimony of the Holy Ghost. If you believe that you have more convincing “evidence” for the truth of your own religion, then you are welcome to it. Mormonism is not for you. There are those, however, who find the testimony we bear more convincing than the kind of “evidence” you offer them. Our message is intended for them.
Or me might hear a variation of “Same to you but more of it.”

Just an observation
 
uh yeah catholicism is anything but simple. Thats not a bad thing, but it is complex. For example why do people kiss a chunk of wood on good Friday? Why is there a saint who is called a “perfect imitator of Christ” (sorry I forget his name but he helps you find lost stuff). Why would anyone pray to anyone other than God etc. Now I know there are reasons for these things in the catholic church, but they are hardly simple ideas for someone who grew up outside those traditions.
I do not of any Saint that was perfect.Saint Anthony of Padua is the Patron saint of lost things. We do not pray to the Saints we ask them to pray for us just as we pray for one another we also ask the saints to pray for us. As for people kissing the Cross on Good Friday an Adoration of the Cross to which the Salvation of the world was brought into Glory.
 
In reference to the questions about the kissing of the cross on Good Friday, this is a common thing to see. It is a practice that is mentioned as an indulgenced action, which among other things means it is an accepted practice. Catholics are not required to participate in this action.
  1. Adoration of the Cross
    (Crucis adoratio)
    A plenary indulgence is granted to the faithful, who in the solemn liturgical action of Good Friday devoutly assist at the adoration of the Cross and kiss it.
Quote is from the Enchiridion of Indulgences (not quoted from the most recent edition. I don’t have access to a fourth edition in English.)
 
In reference to the questions about the kissing of the cross on Good Friday, this is a common thing to see. It is a practice that is mentioned as an indulgenced action, which among other things means it is an accepted practice. Catholics are not required to participate in this action.

Quote is from the Enchiridion of Indulgences (not quoted from the most recent edition. I don’t have access to a fourth edition in English.)
Now the action being looked at by someone from the inside looks very different than from the outside. Questions like why would you kiss a chunk of wood? Where in the bible does it tell you to kiss a chunk of wood? even done to what about germs and slivers? There are many issues which on the surface to those familiar make a whole lot of sense, but are complex if time is taken to explor the various issues and angles.
 
Now the action being looked at by someone from the inside looks very different than from the outside.
In the past, I have been accused of having a religion that is full of rules and too complicated. Therefore, I do not tell LDS that their faith is too complicated. I find Catholicism straightforward. I expect most LDS feel the same way about their faith. But unless you are familiar with a faith, perhaps even from the inside, you might not know what makes a member of it tick. I do know that from the outside looking in, it seems that genealogy is of unusual importance to LDS, and I tend to assume this has some relation to the practice of baptism for those who are dead. Perhaps from the outside looking in, Catholics have a strange habit of hanging crosses that have the body of Jesus on them around their house and of meditating upon the events of Christ’s passion (like our devotion called the way of the cross). I do understand that we appear different from each other! 🙂 That’s what makes a discussion board fruitful in understanding. We talk and learn.
 
The more I read and learn about the LDS the More I realize how Blessed I am To be Catholic. I also see that as one of the ways to know that it is a man made religion. It just keeps getting more and more complicated.

Truly blessed are we by Holy Trinity in the Catholic and Apostolic Church. It is a difficult row we must hoe, but the Plan is straight and simple to see.
🙂 You sure kicked off a little debate!

I hope I didn’t misguide you – my comments about complexity is that a complex subject is more than a fantasy can map out in one or a few men’s minds. So fantasy can be distinguished from truth by looking for irreconcilable differences within a given system and known realities, or even internal contradictions – reality does not ultimately contradict itself.

The LDS religion is bound to differ from ours – so there are two degrees of freedom in what will show up as irreconcilable. The ideas we simply define differently (eg:sacrament) which prove neither religion manmade or anything else, and those illogical decisions made by a fantisizer because they didn’t truly take into consideration all the information available to them. These people exist in the Catholic Church as well, and is one of the reasons we have Dogma as an anchor to reality – to aid those with fantasy problems in knowing what piece of information they are distorting and bring them back to correct understanding.

I am hoping just to understand the LDS position and the differences between our religions – which both sides will point at the set of differences and think “their version is wrong”. But at least we’ll know where some of the differences truly lie.
 
Well we do the best we can with the informaiton we currently have. It is well within the realms of possibility (at least for LDS people) To have the names of persons needing to be baptized reveled directly. At this point I do not believe that that is a practice, but there needs to be a way to address those for whom no record has been kept on earth. When Christ returns the work will continue until it is all done. Under His direct guidance anything that nees to be done can be done.
Ok, what you have said here is reasonable – and points out a couple of things. I don’t think either of us disputes that there is evil “on this earth” and that God is all Good – so that in a certain way there is a fundamental limit to what God can “do” to improve the sinful world we live in. And I suppose it is no surprise that this problem of evil might continue in hell(s).
Matth 13:28 He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
Matth 13:29 But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
The concern I have is limited to the idea of payment and hell, that one who “pays” the price can not enter a heaven until an arbitrary ritual happens on earth for them by proxy. In what I say, I am trying to put my understanding into words – and where I mistake things, please point them out – it helps so much.

An aside:
Just so I don’t attribute religious ideas from one group to another – do you know if you and Zerinis are in the same group of LDS members, eg:the one under Joseph Smith III, or a different group?

Now, we have established that some of these people may stay in waiting longer than others – but I gather from Zerinis that all levels of heaven are “saved” meaning that the basic “saved” issues are only truly awkward in the justice sense for people in hell, who have paid, and are waiting to get out.

Now, although a potentialy long overstay (at least more than a day), we can be comforted that it is never an eternal injustice. Now, that’s fine, logically, although I want to ask for a further comforting detail – In any of the LDS revelations does God/Jesus explain like the “wheat and tares” parable why baptism is impossible except on earth – eg: is there absolutely no water in the temporary hell, and in all three heavens?
 
JS the 3rd is part of what was the RLDS and now community of Christ. I’m not in that group.

As far as baptisms the only answer to that I’ve heard is that it has to be done on earth with a live person. Something to do with our bodies and not just our spirits. Sorry that may not clear things up much.
 
I think you just want to confuse the issue. The LDS doctrine of salvation and baptism for the dead is not really that difficult to understand.
Zerinus, I have no control over how the LDS religion came into existence or why they chose historically to use some Christian terms the way they did. If you think this of me, fine – it is no less than what I do with Catholic Doctrine as anyone who goes through my public back posts would know.
When working with non-catholics, I am usually in the explanitory position – not the questioning one – and I “un-confuse” those who have a mixed up idea of what Catholocism is – but I don’t deny their confusion. Sometimes I come to a better understanding of my faith because my answers aren’t “bulletproof” and I have to do some research to understand it better. I offer everyone else the same courtesy.

I am just going to document the differences as we go along, as it is sort of easy to loose track otherwise.

I would think, as a catholic, that there are three heavens anyway.
There is the air above my head which birds fly through, then there is the heaven above that which is all the stars and planets and asteroids. and… Then there is the third heaven – or if you prefer the “heaven of heavens” which is what we would normally call historically as the Heaven of God, or God’s abode.
Now, I assume that from your desription – even this word is not the same to the LDS but you mean there are three “places” or “states” of Joy which cover all the possible magnitudes of reward for any person on earth in relation to God.

There is more, but I need to go slow – too much information is a problem with so many differences to explore.
 
Zerinus, I have no control over how the LDS religion came into existence or why they chose historically to use some Christian terms the way they did. If you think this of me, fine – it is no less than what I do with Catholic Doctrine as anyone who goes through my public back posts would know.
When working with non-catholics, I am usually in the explanitory position – . . .
If you really want to explore Mormonism (from a doctrinal point of view at least), I will show you a good way. Get hold of a copy of all the LDS scriptures (Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price), and just read through them. You don’t need to do anything else. You will know a lot more by doing that, than by just asking questions from Mormons in here. Nothing wrong with asking questions either; but if you did that, you could then ask more informed and searching questions which can solicit more intelligent answers.

zerinus
 
Apparently the LDS site doesn’t like to load from my school computer, but I am easily able to find the documents at BYU something or rather with a search engine – I assume the LDS is the same as you two.

The problem with reading a book is that it never talks back and can’t explain when something is misinterpreted – and why:

Acts 8:30 … and heard him reading Isaias, and asked, Canst thou understand what you are reading.
Acts 8:30 How could I, said he, without someone to guide me.

It isn’t like the Ethiopian isn’t intelligent, but scripture would need to be studied in detail for quite some years – with many ideas rejected because they simply “don’t fit” until one comes to a small family of possible solutions. How much better to talk to someone and cross examine what is said – compiling wisdom and rejecting foolishness.

And in my experience in explaining the Catholic faith to others, many of the brighter students don’t get certain passages for the same reasons I didn’t at first. Now I know why the church texts are as they are, but there are many people whom I have helped who would otherwise have been severely tempted to atheism (I have been there).

As to searching questions, don’t worry – that always comes.

D&C 76: Only three places mentioned: Telestial (lowest), Terestrial (earthly/middle), Celestial (Highest)
D&C 138:
28 And I wondered at the words of Peter—wherein he said that the Son of God preached unto the spirits in prison, who sometime were disobedient, when once the long-suffering of God waited in the days of Noah—and how it was possible for him to preach to those spirits and perform the necessary labor among them in so short a time.
29 And as I wondered, my eyes were opened, and my understanding quickened, and I perceived that the Lord went not in person among the wicked and the disobedient who had rejected the truth, to teach them;
I’m just trying to keep it down to two sentences – but this indicates that LDS believe Jesus didn’t actually preach to the souls in prison, although LDS use the bible verse to say that preaching was necessary – I normally believe bible verses unless I have evidence that there is a reason why it is not fully explained – but the solution (D&C30) is to recruit others to do this task, how is it that the time was too short just to preach the message – but not so short that he could find, teach to memory (I assume there are no bodies or paper in this world) in that same short period of time, while still not preaching among the dead?

Could you summarize (roughly) how many people were in the abode of the dead, and why there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to preach to them all – He normally preached to crowds of 5000 and 7000.
 
While I wait for a reply…
Genesis 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven."
An interesting bit of trivia…
It is true that πετρος (petros) was not common in biblical times, or for a long time before that.
 
Could you summarize (roughly) how many people were in the abode of the dead, and why there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to preach to them all – He normally preached to crowds of 5000 and 7000.
The Mormon idea of the “Spirit World” specifically the Spirit Prison ROUGHLY equates to “the Bosom of Abraham” HOWEVER, in LDS theology this probation state is currently still open for business.

In LDS theology, Jesus would have had to preach to every single non-Jew who lived before him, AND go visit the Nephites in the Americas ALL in the three days between his crucifixion and resurrection.

Just FYI.

~Former Mormon, current Catechumen.
 
The Mormon idea of the “Spirit World” specifically the Spirit Prison ROUGHLY equates to “the Bosom of Abraham” HOWEVER, in LDS theology this probation state is currently still open for business.

In LDS theology, Jesus would have had to preach to every single non-Jew who lived before him, AND go visit the Nephites in the Americas ALL in the three days between his crucifixion and resurrection.

Just FYI.

~Former Mormon, current Catechumen.
The nephites I overlooked.

The reason I asked is that Noah preached to the antediluvians who are mentioned in Peter, so that it seems they might have already heard most of the message. Those people had time to repent as the water went up to their ankles, necks, …, and since those waters where the ark saved 8 people was “a baptism”, it is clear that those who disobeyed “in hope” were baptized the hard way into a death in water. So the fact that they might have cried out to God to save them (the meaning of Jesus’ name) seems like it is ignored totally here… among some other thoughts… So the theology of this world seems – rather skimpy in light of these revelations…

Another reason I ask is that – since time is explicitly mentioned by JSjr, – the spirit world is temporal as well in his view – so is the spirit world all on the same clock so to speak for the LDS 1hour there = 1hour here? that kind of thing.

Since you mention three days, is that then all the time he had in the spirit world too? (I think you see what I would like to pin down).
 
…] Since you mention three days, is that then all the time he had in the spirit world too? (I think you see what I would like to pin down).
According to the LDS church, yes, only 3 days.

The “Spirit World” is only the “intermission” between physical death and resurrection. After Jesus’ resurrection he ascended into HEAVEN (and more specifically to a Mormon, the Celestial Kingdom of Heaven, since in Mormonism there are 3 levels of heaven).

I was always taught in Sunday School, and LDS Seminary that if God resurrects you (prematurely, prior to the FINAL JUDGEMENT for whatever reason), then your next step is judgement and thus exhaltation into a degree of glory.

This then begs the question: “What of all the angelic ministers (that once lived mortal lives on earth) that were “resurrected” during J Smith’s day in order for the restoration to happen?”

I guess this would lead you to believe that John the Baptist, Moroni, et. al. have all been judged and are among the few currently in the Celestial Kingdom (though if my memory serves me correctly, THIS would contradict the LDS doctrine that only God the Father, and Jesus are currently in heaven, everyone else is in the Spirit World).
 
According to the LDS church, yes, only 3 days.

The “Spirit World” is only the “intermission” between physical death and resurrection. After Jesus’ resurrection he ascended into HEAVEN (and more specifically to a Mormon, the Celestial Kingdom of Heaven, since in Mormonism there are 3 levels of heaven).
Yes, I got that part. So, they ignore the heaven that birds fly in, and count three other heavens… and it seems that the only true “hell” is the “outer darkness” or something like that. So there appears to be 4 states/places total for the end.

The description Zerinus gave me earlier was a bit misleading…

JSjr also seems to overlook that in the book of Revelation, John was granted superhuman power to “hear” all of creation. And it is quite odd, that in preaching to the dead that Jesus just didn’t turn all of their “ears” on to hear him – so he had to say the message only once for all. After all he had to preach to at least the justified so they could know his message – the speaking in tongues miracle at Pentecost shows that God knows how to do that kind of thing for big crowds even with language barrier problems.
The incident doesn’t say the apostles “spoke” all these different tongues, just that everyone heard them in their own tongue.

How much of a gospel did he have to preach to them for the preaching to be sufficient in LDS thinking?
I was always taught in Sunday School, and LDS Seminary that if God resurrects you (prematurely, prior to the FINAL JUDGEMENT for whatever reason), then your next step is judgement and thus exhaltation into a degree of glory.
This then begs the question: “What of all the angelic ministers (that once lived mortal lives on earth) that were “resurrected” during J Smith’s day in order for the restoration to happen?”
Not to mention that the only LDS I talked to mentioned that St. John was never to die, and I think 4 others in the Americas — but they all disappeared from the tangible earth. Are we to understand he imagined them Translated into the Celestial kingdom?
I guess this would lead you to believe that John the Baptist, Moroni, et. al. have all been judged and are among the few currently in the Celestial Kingdom (though if my memory serves me correctly, THIS would contradict the LDS doctrine that only God the Father, and Jesus are currently in heaven, everyone else is in the Spirit World).
That is exactly the kind of thing which would be interesting to talk about, in addition to obvious biblical clashes. Do you recall where this might be stated, in D&C or someplace else?

ibid.
 
scriptures.lds.org/

can get you the info without spending the 10-20 bucks
That is a good site for doing searches or looking up passages, but not for reading the whole of the scriptures. That is best done from a book. You can get paperback editions quite cheaply. You can obtain the Bible and Book of Mormon for free from here; but the Tripple Combination unfortunately does not seem to be available for free. A paperback edition of that, however, can be obtained for a reasonable price from any distribution center, or by asking any Mormon friends or missionaries you may know.

zerinus
 
The problem with reading a book is that it never talks back and can’t explain when something is misinterpreted – and why:

Acts 8:30 … and heard him reading Isaias, and asked, Canst thou understand what you are reading.
Acts 8:30 How could I, said he, without someone to guide me.

It isn’t like the Ethiopian isn’t intelligent, but scripture would need to be studied in detail for quite some years – with many ideas rejected because they simply “don’t fit” until one comes to a small family of possible solutions. How much better to talk to someone and cross examine what is said – compiling wisdom and rejecting foolishness.
That illustrates my point very well. That didn’t mean that the Ethiopian shouldn’t have been reading the Bible at all. If he hadn’t been reading his Bible, he wouldn’t have known what was said to be able to ask intelligent questions about them. If you read the LDS scriptures I had told you, there may be passages in them that will not be clear on the first reading; but there will be many more passages that will be clear, and you will learn a lot from them. The bits that are not clear at first will become clear as you read along, or as you ask questions later.
As to searching questions, don’t worry – that always comes.
They may appear like searching questions to you, but may not be very intelligent questions if you haven’t familiarized yourself with the original materials in the first place.
D&C 76: Only three places mentioned: Telestial (lowest), Terestrial (earthly/middle), Celestial (Highest)
The heaven that the scriptures talk about is the heaven that God and the immortal angels dwell, not the one in which mortal birds fly.
I’m just trying to keep it down to two sentences – but this indicates that LDS believe Jesus didn’t actually preach to the souls in prison, although LDS use the bible verse to say that preaching was necessary – I normally believe bible verses unless I have evidence that there is a reason why it is not fully explained – but the solution (D&C30) is to recruit others to do this task, how is it that the time was too short just to preach the message – but not so short that he could find, teach to memory (I assume there are no bodies or paper in this world) in that same short period of time, while still not preaching among the dead?
Your sentences appear a bit confused, and I am not quite sure I have understood your question. But as far as I can understand the question, the reason why Jesus did not manifest Himself to all the dead in the spirit world was not just because He didn’t have the time to; but because they had been sinners, and therefore unworthy of His presence. Therefore Jesus appointed the righteous spirits whom He had appeared to and instructed, to go and preach to those whom He had not personally visited because of their unwothiness.
Could you summarize (roughly) how many people were in the abode of the dead, and why there wasn’t enough time for Jesus to preach to them all – He normally preached to crowds of 5000 and 7000.
Your guess would be as good as mine; but I would say they ran into billions, not millions.

zerinus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top