M
michaelcollins
Guest
I am new to this thread and I have read your posts to this one. I must respond and ask you some rather pointed questions.Perhaps what I am not understanding is this… if your CCC says one thing , and it is suppose to be the complete and final word on a doctrine that you must always turn to, then how can the newest Pope say something contrary and still be right ? Or how can he take away something that a previous pope installed and still be right ?
If the CCC says that infants are entrusted to God for his mercy and saving Grace then why all fuse with infant baptism in the first place ? The Popes have teedered back and forth on this issue with one saying yes and now again saying no but what they say makes no differece since the CCC says the final word ?
So throughout all of the different rites and different Popes, the church can claim that their has never been anything contrary to the original church taught because what the individuals and Popes do makes no difference it doesn’t count if the CCC says something else ? Am I getting it right ?
First, have you ever participated in an organization or been a part of an organization that has lasted for several generations? If so, you know there are differances between policy and sometimes the day-to-day practice, even if it does not make it right. I am not saying the churches doctrine changes but the way it is viewed at any time over history changes because while we are Christs church we are made up of humans.
WE DO NOT CLAIM TO BE INFALLABE.
We are made up of humans, humans have different levels of knowledge in 2008 than in the first century-would you expect everything to be the same? We are not a church of literal bible interpretation, we are not protestant.
Your posts indicate several things, first a desire to question our religion which is ok, but by searching out our failures and asking why these occurred. It is as if you are the protestant who says but noone expects the spanish inquisition not knowing that there were very few, less than 200 in almost 2 centuries, protestants involved in the inqusition, and who fails to acknowledge that torture while not generally an admired activity was a very common one used by goverments, police, military etc in those times.
church practice has evolved over the years as human knowledge and activity has changed, church dogma has stayed the same.
We also have theories within our doctrines, not dogma that are not dogma and sometimes change because we dont claim to have the answes to those particular areas. That does not mean we dont search out the answers or that we are not at times inspired but public phophicies etc ended with John.
You remain or return to the papal infallability question- search out when it occurs under what circumstances and how many times it has been used over the history of the church.
To this date have you read the CCC as you have been referred to?
Do you understand the churches position on free will? Even catholics have free will and can choose to live outside God’s law, I for one make mistakes and sin on almost a daily basis.
Why the fasicination with the shortcomings of the church and its failures? Do you believe there is a church or ever has been a church with members who were perfect?
What religion do you belong to?
Do you understand the church’s teaching on faith?
Nancy