C
CyrilSebastian
Guest
Emma Hale Smith was the main signatory of a petition in 1842, with a thousand female signatures, denying that Joseph Smith wad connected with polygamy.
Maybe they’re tired of being woken up on Saturday mornings, too.As much as I am not a fan of Mormon theology and the Mormon Church, I still hate to see the secular media gloating over the difficulties of any religious group.
Would allowing polygamy be a redefinition of the word “marriage”? Is polygamy something new?
Genesis 16:3: So, after Abram had lived ten years in the land of Canaan, Sarai, Abram’s wife, took Hagar the Egyptian, her slave-girl, and gave her to her husband Abram as a wife.
Genesis 29:20-28: So Jacob served seven years for Rachel, and they seemed to him but a few days because of the love he had for her. Then Jacob said to Laban, “Give me my wife that I may go in to her, for my time is completed.” So Laban gathered together all the people of the place and made a feast. But in the evening he took his daughter Leah and brought her to Jacob, and he went in to her. (Laban gave** his female servant Zilpah to his daughter Leah to be her servant.) And in the morning, behold, it was Leah! And Jacob said to Laban, “What is this you have done to me? Did I not serve with you for Rachel? Why then have you deceived me?” Laban said, “It is not so done in our country, to give the younger before the firstborn. Complete the week of this one, and we will give you the other also in return for serving me another seven years.” Jacob did so, and completed her week. Then Laban gave him his daughter Rachel to be his wife.
Judges 8:29-32: Jerubbaal the son of Joash went and lived in his own house. Now Gideon had seventy sons, his own offspring,for he had many wives. And his concubine who was in Shechem also bore him a son, and he called his name Abimelech.
1 Samuel 1:1-2: There was a certain man of Ramathaim-zophim of the hill country of Ephraim whose name was Elkanah the son of Jeroham, son of Elihu, son of Tohu, son of Zuph, an Ephrathite. He had two wives. The name of the one was Hannah, and the name of the other, Peninnah.
2 Samuel 3:2-5: And sons were born to David at Hebron: his firstborn was Amnon, of Ahinoam of Jezreel; and his second, Chileab, of Abigail the widow of Nabal of Carmel; and the third, Absalom the son of Maacah the daughter of Talmai king of Geshur; and the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith; and the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital; and the sixth, Ithream, of Eglah, David’s wife. These were born to David in Hebron.
1 Kings 11:1-3: Now King Solomon loved many foreign women, along with the daughter of Pharaoh: Moabite, Ammonite, Edomite, Sidonian, and Hittite women, from the nations concerning which the Lord had said to the people of Israel, “You shall not enter into marriage with them, neither shall they with you, for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods.” Solomon clung to these in love. He had 700 wives, who were princesses, and 300 concubines. And his wives turned away his heart.**
It would be for this country, yes.
Utah anti-polygamy law declared unconstitutional…This is off the subject but with the way that same sex marriage is steamrolling over America I am surprise there has been no court case challenging the laws against plural marriages.
Why? Isn’t it important that the truth come out? Would you rather see faithful Mormons continue to be deceived? I am happy the LDS church is starting to acknowledge the truth (albeit they are still not being entirely forthcoming with the complete truth) and that because of the publicity the essays are receiving more Mormons are starting to see that they have been deceived.As much as I am not a fan of Mormon theology and the Mormon Church, I still hate to see the secular media gloating over the difficulties of any religious group.
I agree. Plus, it would be redefining marriage from the way God established it in the beginning. It was Adam and Eve. Not Adam and Eve, Jennifer and Emily.It would be for this country, yes.
Based on the recent activity on ex-Mormon online forums, there has already been an affect, which is a good thing. I normally ignore Mormon related posts on my Facebook feed, but I actually responded to a FB friend who decided to insult all the LDS and former LDS who didn’t know about the extent of Joseph’s polygamy. Somehow, it is all our fault that we didn’t know these things and if we react by leaving, well, that is our fault too.Iepuras - That is the question is it not?
So an “angel made him do it” by threatening him with a sword? This angel directed him to commit adultery with over ten married women and marry 40 women in less than 20 years (from age 22 to 42)?
He did this despite not testing the angel to discern if it was from God or not?
1 John 4Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God
It’s clear that the LDS Church has put this paper out to help stem the flow of people out of the Church. It will be interesting to see if it has any affect.
PnP
So do you think that Abraham, Jacob, Elkanah (the father of Samuel), David and Solomon were doing something displeasing to God by practicing polygamy? God said of David, “I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after mine own heart” (Acts 13:22).I agree. Plus, it would be redefining marriage from the way God established it in the beginning. It was Adam and Eve. Not Adam and Eve, Jennifer and Emily.
I recommend reading through this thread starting on page 19 for a discussion on OT polygamy.So do you think that Abraham, Jacob, Elkanah (the father of Samuel), David and Solomon were doing something displeasing to God by practicing polygamy? God said of David, “I have found David the son of Jesse, a man after mine own heart” (Acts 13:22).
There were numerous prophets sent by God in the Old Testament and not one of them said anything condemning polygamy. God tells Jeramiah (15:19), for example, “you shall serve as my mouth”. So why didn’t God ever say anything through one of these prophets who were acting as His mouth about polygamy being displeasing to Him?So, yes, I do think that men such as Abraham, Jacob, Elkanah, David and Solomon were doing something displeasing to God with their polygamy.
Why are you also not asking why these same prophets did not condemn divorce? Jesus clearly condemned divorce and stated that remarriage after divorce is adultery. Why didn’t those same prophets also condemn divorce?There were numerous prophets sent by God in the Old Testament and not one of them said anything condemning polygamy. God tells Jeramiah (15:19), for example, “you shall serve as my mouth”. So why didn’t God ever say anything through one of these prophets who were acting as His mouth about polygamy being displeasing to Him?
There is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9). All heresies are old heresies.I saw that article earlier. Made me think of how similar Joseph Smith and Mohammed were in some ways. Lots of wives, some extremely young. Having things dictated by an “angel.” Interesting.
Bingo!Why are you also not asking why these same prophets did not condemn divorce? Jesus clearly condemned divorce and stated that remarriage after divorce is adultery. Why didn’t those same prophets also condemn divorce?
There have been quite a few LDS historians who have either been excommunicated or disfellowshipped for writing about these issues. Now that the LDS church is starting to publicly admit some of these historical problems that it previously denied or ignored, is it going to excommunicate itself?The Mormon church finally acknowledges founder Joseph Smith’s polygamy
washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2014/11/11/the-mormon-church-finally-acknowledges-founder-joseph-smiths-polygamy/?hpid=z4
Many Mormons have mixed feelings about a recent disclosure from the church, acknowledging for the first time that the religion’s founder Joseph Smith had as many as 40 wives in his lifetime, including teenagers. That is, if they even heard about the disclosure at all.
The New York Times published a piece on Tuesday looking at the aftermath of the somewhat unusual acknowledgement, which was posted to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints Web site in late October. The church has long renounced polygamy. And until now, it has never officially acknowledged Smith’s multiple marriages, only discussing his first marriage to Emma Hale Smith.
Interesting articles.
As I studied both men, I felt the same way and all I could think was, “Well, there’s a reason why Jesus himself warned us of false prophets.” He was warning us about men like Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, L. Ron Hubbard, and their ilk. These warnings weren’t for naught. Because we didn’t listen to Christ’s warnings, there’s not a Muslim border today that doesn’t know warfare and violence. Although Mormons are tame by comparison, how many souls have they led astray? Beware of any man who calls himself prophet… especially when they behave like scoudrals.I saw that article earlier. Made me think of how similar Joseph Smith and Mohammed were in some ways. Lots of wives, some extremely young. Having things dictated by an “angel.” Interesting.