G
GTNJNightingale
Guest
My mother in law was talking to me the other day about her faith(LDS) and she said a couple things that sent up a red flag. one was about the Trinity. she said that they believe that the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit are three seperate “persons” in the same purpose. saying that the Father has a body of flesh and bone. as well as the son. and the holy Ghost for some reason wasn’t able to receive his body due to some reason unknown but that’s why its his job to put the spirit in every person to earn his body. what the…??? I thought!
where does this even come from! its like…way out there. and I thought about what she had said for days after in fact i still think about it… i understand that she believes this with her heart and soul…i understand, i guess… how you could rationalize this for the human brain to understand… but what i don’t understand is how if a person believes in our Lord and loves him and seeks his truth how then they could accept this teaching. because this teaching is not Jesus teaching on who he is. so i then explained to her my understanding of who God is and who he says he is! about the catholic churches teachings about the trinity. Father son and holy spirit all in one God. and she asked me well how can this be so? how can the father and the son speak to each other and be in two different places at the same time if they are one…it doesn’t make any sense. I told her well it wouldn’t make sense if you thought of God the father as having a body of flesh and bones. but if you believe that he is omnipotent and with out any form …than it would fit and make perfect sense…that the Father is formless, that God came down in the form of man (hence son of God) and the holy spirit is in both of them and in all things…but when you try to limit God the father to a body then it doesn’t make any sense .
Another thing i was thinking is that Mormons and Catholics alike believe that when Jesus was preaching his word he had a group of followers and he called these followers disciples. They were to go out into the world and preach the things that Jesus had told them. And they did. Only the things the apostles were teaching of was not of three separate Gods but rather the understanding of the trinity. maybe not the actual word “trinity” but the understanding of the holy trinity. and this is what they wrote and preached about. my question is if the apostles were wrong about there understanding of who Jesus said he was …dont you think that he would have corrected them and said …no you foolish men …we are not one God we are three gods in one purpose…or what ever??? i mean really. Jesus s work was done. he taught the apostles all that they were to preach about. He loved us so much that he was willing to suffer and die for us. to come down in the form of man to Shepard us to him. This is where the understanding of the trinity comes from…Jesus! not the church just teaches this because its been made up or because it sounds good but because this is GODS TRUTH! its the good good good good news!!!
where does this even come from! its like…way out there. and I thought about what she had said for days after in fact i still think about it… i understand that she believes this with her heart and soul…i understand, i guess… how you could rationalize this for the human brain to understand… but what i don’t understand is how if a person believes in our Lord and loves him and seeks his truth how then they could accept this teaching. because this teaching is not Jesus teaching on who he is. so i then explained to her my understanding of who God is and who he says he is! about the catholic churches teachings about the trinity. Father son and holy spirit all in one God. and she asked me well how can this be so? how can the father and the son speak to each other and be in two different places at the same time if they are one…it doesn’t make any sense. I told her well it wouldn’t make sense if you thought of God the father as having a body of flesh and bones. but if you believe that he is omnipotent and with out any form …than it would fit and make perfect sense…that the Father is formless, that God came down in the form of man (hence son of God) and the holy spirit is in both of them and in all things…but when you try to limit God the father to a body then it doesn’t make any sense .
Another thing i was thinking is that Mormons and Catholics alike believe that when Jesus was preaching his word he had a group of followers and he called these followers disciples. They were to go out into the world and preach the things that Jesus had told them. And they did. Only the things the apostles were teaching of was not of three separate Gods but rather the understanding of the trinity. maybe not the actual word “trinity” but the understanding of the holy trinity. and this is what they wrote and preached about. my question is if the apostles were wrong about there understanding of who Jesus said he was …dont you think that he would have corrected them and said …no you foolish men …we are not one God we are three gods in one purpose…or what ever??? i mean really. Jesus s work was done. he taught the apostles all that they were to preach about. He loved us so much that he was willing to suffer and die for us. to come down in the form of man to Shepard us to him. This is where the understanding of the trinity comes from…Jesus! not the church just teaches this because its been made up or because it sounds good but because this is GODS TRUTH! its the good good good good news!!!