Mormons and the Origin of the Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter rpp
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rpp

Guest
On another thread, there was this exchange:
But why do you quote the Bible? The Bible was assembled by the Catholic Church hundreds of years after the Church became apostate, according to to Joseph Smith and the other founders of LDS. I would think that you would not be able to trust a book put together by a bunch of heretics and apostates.
Catholics are always saying that, which is a lot of nonsense. God gave us the Bible through His holy prophets. The Catholic Church did no such thing.
This is a two-part question. Is this person’s assertion what the Mormon religion teaches? If the Catholic Church did not assemble the Bible, then how did the Bible that we have today come to be?
 
Zerinus does not disagree with us so much as he disagrees with the Book of Mormon:
28 Wherefore, thou seest that after the book (the bible) hath gone forth through the hands of the great and abominable church (that’s us, folks), that there are many plain and precious things taken away from the book, which is the book of the Lamb of God.
29 And after these plain and precious things were taken away it goeth forth unto all the nations of the Gentiles; and after it goeth forth unto all the nations of the Gentiles, yea, even across the many waters which thou hast seen with the Gentiles which have gone forth out of captivity, thou seest—because of the many plain and precious things which have been taken out of the book, which were plain unto the understanding of the children of men, according to the plainness which is in the Lamb of God—because of these things which are taken away out of the gospel of the Lamb, an exceedingly great many do stumble, yea, insomuch that Satan hath great power over them. (1Nephi 13:28-29)
Paul
 
I have already addressed that question in this post:

zerinus.blogspot.com/2007/07/foundational-premise-of-mormonism.html

zerinus
You put a very interesting but logically flawed spin on this. You claim the Early Church Fathers pretty much agreed on what to include on this, yet you conveniently fail to point out four things.

The ECFs were all Catholic.

There was some dispute.

It was not until two Catholic Church affirmed this list that the disputes ended and the canon of scripture was finalized.

The Church maintained and preserved the scriptures through decades and centuries of often violent and destructive political and social upheavals.

Your blog also is incorrect when it says the Catholic Church claims to have written the Bible. The Church has never made such a claim.

So you say the Catholic Church did not assemble the Bible, then you go to explain how Catholics assembled it. :confused:
 
I selected what I feel are the greatest works of Shakespeare then assembled them together in my library. Therefore no one can praise Shakespeare as a great poet and playwright or even quote his work unless they acknowledge me as the sole expert on William Shakespeare.
 
I selected what I feel are the greatest works of Shakespeare then assembled them together in my library. Therefore no one can praise Shakespeare as a great poet and playwright or even quote his work unless they acknowledge me as the sole expert on William Shakespeare.
The analogy does not work for a number of reasons.

Shakespeare’s work, while beautiful, is not the inspired word of God.

The Church is not a single person.

The Church has never prevented anyone from praising God or His Word in any way, including the Church’s enemies.
 
On another thread, there was this exchange:

This is a two-part question. Is this person’s assertion what the Mormon religion teaches? If the Catholic Church did not assemble the Bible, then how did the Bible that we have today come to be?
Mormons aren’t generally taught Christian history, and are left to their own devices to search out any Christian history they have an interest in.

Mormons are taught the Bible was assembled. Rarely are they taught how, who or why. They are also taught that in this process of assembling the Bible that the original texts were altered, or diluted and so the Bible to them, though scriptural, is incomplete.

They also believe that for hundreds of years the Bible was kept by Catholic clergy from the general public for nefarious reasons (not really sure why they believe this).
 
You put a very interesting but logically flawed spin on this. You claim the Early Church Fathers pretty much agreed on what to include on this, yet you conveniently fail to point out four things.

The ECFs were all Catholic.

There was some dispute.

It was not until two Catholic Church affirmed this list that the disputes ended and the canon of scripture was finalized.

The Church maintained and preserved the scriptures through decades and centuries of often violent and destructive political and social upheavals.

Your blog also is incorrect when it says the Catholic Church claims to have written the Bible. The Church has never made such a claim.

So you say the Catholic Church did not assemble the Bible, then you go to explain how Catholics assembled it. :confused:
You are the one who is twisting my words. I never said that the Catholic Church claims that it “wrote the Bible”. I said that Catholics make such a claim. That is perfectly true. I have noticed it on this very forum tens of times. The Catholics whom I have debated with here have often stated that the Catholic Church “wrote the Bible,” or “gave us the Bible,” or words to that effect, which of course is nonsense. It did no such thing. It was God who gave us the Bible through his prophets. If any specific group of people can legitimately claim that they “wrote the Bible” or “gave us the Bible,” it would have to be the Jews. Do you mean to tell me that if there were no Catholic Church, there would be no Bible, or nobody had heard of the Bible, or that no one could fathom what the canon of scripture was? How about the Jews, to whom the bulk of the Bible (the Old Testament) always belonged? Did they not know what the Bible was, or what scripture was, until the Catholics came along and told them? Try and tell the Jews on this forum that, and see what they will tell you. In the New Testament times, when people talked about scripture, they always meant the Old Testament, because the New Testament, or parts of it at least, had not yet even been written. But everybody knew what was sacred scripture and what wasn’t. Ok, and they were Christians—and that proves exactly what?

Even accepting what you are saying—that later on in the history of Christianity disputes arose about what books should be included in scripture and shouldn’t; and a couple of church councils was held to resolve that dispute. So what? That proves what? That Mormons, or Protestants, or anybody else who cares to has no right to use the Bible? By what logic? What if the Jews said that the Old Testament belongs to them, and you have no right to use the Old Testament? What are you going to do about that?

zerinus
 
Zerinus,

You say the canon of the bible was established by the Jews a long time before the Catholics “put it together”. Your lack of knowledge of Christian history and the history of the canon is incredible. You have actually made up facts.

Believe it or not, there was not agreement on canon until the Catholic Church made it final.

YOU SAID: "God “gave us” the Bible through His Chosen prophets and Apostles. The Bible was written by the Jews. Both the Old and the New Testaments were written by the Jews. The canon of the Old Testament was well known and established among the Jews long before the Catholic Church came along. For the Catholic Church to lay exclusive claim to the Bible, would be like the Jews claiming the exclusive right to the Old Testament!"

When you say the Jews wrote the New Testament, are you referring to their heritage, or their religion. Are you implying that Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John etc were not Christian?

Zerinus, what is your educational background?
 
Zerinus,

You say the canon of the bible was established by the Jews a long time before the Catholics “put it together”. Your lack of knowledge of Christian history and the history of the canon is incredible. You have actually made up facts.

Believe it or not, there was not agreement on canon until the Catholic Church made it final.

YOU SAID: "God “gave us” the Bible through His Chosen prophets and Apostles. The Bible was written by the Jews. Both the Old and the New Testaments were written by the Jews. The canon of the Old Testament was well known and established among the Jews long before the Catholic Church came along. For the Catholic Church to lay exclusive claim to the Bible, would be like the Jews claiming the exclusive right to the Old Testament!"

When you say the Jews wrote the New Testament, are you referring to their heritage, or their religion. Are you implying that Paul, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John etc were not Christian?

Zerinus, what is your educational background?
I am referring to this scripture:

John 4:22: “. . . for salvation is of the Jews.”

zerinus
 
You are the one who is twisting my words. I never said that the Catholic Church claims that it “wrote the Bible”. I said that Catholics make such a claim. That is perfectly true. I have noticed it on this very forum tens of times. The Catholics whom I have debated with here have often stated that the Catholic Church “wrote the Bible,” or “gave us the Bible,” or words to that effect, which of course is nonsense. It did no such thing. It was God who gave us the Bible through his prophets. If any specific group of people can legitimately claim that they “wrote the Bible” or “gave us the Bible,” it would have to be the Jews. Do you mean to tell me that if there were no Catholic Church, there would be no Bible, or nobody had heard of the Bible, or that no one could fathom what the canon of scripture was? How about the Jews, to whom the bulk of the Bible (the Old Testament) always belonged? Did they not know what the Bible was, or what scripture was, until the Catholics came along and told them? Try and tell the Jews on this forum that, and see what they will tell you. In the New Testament times, when people talked about scripture, they always meant the Old Testament, because the New Testament, or parts of it at least, had not yet even been written. But everybody knew what was sacred scripture and what wasn’t. Ok, and they were Christians—and that proves exactly what?

Even accepting what you are saying—that later on in the history of Christianity disputes arose about what books should be included in scripture and shouldn’t; and a couple of church councils was held to resolve that dispute. So what? That proves what? That Mormons, or Protestants, or anybody else who cares to has no right to use the Bible? By what logic? What if the Jews said that the Old Testament belongs to them, and you have no right to use the Old Testament? What are you going to do about that?

zerinus
Okay, there is little logic in this rant. And I will igmore the aggressiver and uncharitable tone you always seem to take.

Of course there would be no Bible as we have it today without the Catholic Church. There would be several competing canons of the Old Testament, but no New Testament at all. The inspired Christian writings (NT), would be all confused with pious instruction and uninspired writings as well as with the gnostic stuff that started appearing in middle and late 2nd century.

Your blog does not distinguish between what the Catholic church teaches and what you - without citation - claim some ignorant Catholics say. For my part, I have never seen anywhere when any Catholic made the claim that the Church wrote the Bible.

Thus your implication is that the Catholic Church claims to have written the Bible.

What you really do is make a false assertion, “Catholics” claim they wrote the Bible. An assertion which you provide no evidence at all for. Then divert the issue by talking about the Old Testament or other things. You never talk about the real question or make a statement about the New Testament.

But ultimately, this thread has confirmed two things

The Mormon Religion **does **teach that the Catholic Church assembled the Bible.

And you have confirmed that the you believe that the Catholic Church assembled the Bible.

And one final confirmation.

No one anywhere on any thread has ever asserted that Scripture was not written by prophets and teachers inspired by God. But people like to falsely accuse Catholics of making such an assertion.

Thank you for clearing this up.

Boy, and you claim people attack the Mormon Church. What do you think you are doing to the Catholic Church. I am thinking about the color of some cooking dishes that are able to speak.
 
The analogy does not work for a number of reasons.

Shakespeare’s work, while beautiful, is not the inspired word of God.
True but…So?
The Church is not a single person.
Ok, so I organized a commitee to assemble the works of Shakespear.
The Church has never prevented anyone from praising God or His Word in any way, including the Church’s enemies.
According to rpp a person cannot quote the from the Bible without acknowledging the Catholic Church as the sole authority on God’s word.

The analogy fits beautifully. It illustrates how stupid the argument is and what a waste of time it is to even discuss it.
 
True but…So?
Ok, so I organized a commitee to assemble the works of Shakespear.According to rpp a person cannot quote the from the Bible without acknowledging the Catholic Church as the sole authority on God’s word.

The analogy fits beautifully. It illustrates how stupid the argument is and what a waste of time it is to even discuss it.
Typical mormon come back, start with the insults when you dont have the answers!
 
Okay, there is little logic in this rant. And I will igmore the aggressiver and uncharitable tone you always seem to take.

Of course there would be no Bible as we have it today without the Catholic Church. There would be several competing canons of the Old Testament, but no New Testament at all. The inspired Christian writings (NT), would be all confused with pious instruction and uninspired writings as well as with the gnostic stuff that started appearing in middle and late 2nd century.

Your blog does not distinguish between what the Catholic church teaches and what you - without citation - claim some ignorant Catholics say. For my part, I have never seen anywhere when any Catholic made the claim that the Church wrote the Bible.

Thus your implication is that the Catholic Church claims to have written the Bible.

What you really do is make a false assertion, “Catholics” claim they wrote the Bible. An assertion which you provide no evidence at all for. Then divert the issue by talking about the Old Testament or other things. You never talk about the real question or make a statement about the New Testament.

But ultimately, this thread has confirmed two things

The Mormon Religion **does **teach that the Catholic Church assembled the Bible.

And you have confirmed that the you believe that the Catholic Church assembled the Bible.

And one final confirmation.

No one anywhere on any thread has ever asserted that Scripture was not written by prophets and teachers inspired by God. But people like to falsely accuse Catholics of making such an assertion.

Thank you for clearing this up.

Boy, and you claim people attack the Mormon Church. What do you think you are doing to the Catholic Church. I am thinking about the color of some cooking dishes that are able to speak.
OK, I did a search of CAF, and found these examples of Catholics claiming that the Catholic Church “wrote the Bible” or “gave us the Bible”:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=845635&postcount=42
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2645214&postcount=3
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2646087&postcount=11
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3134089&postcount=23
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=3216171&postcount=27
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2057205&postcount=17
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2062717&postcount=48
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1956728&postcount=23
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1492533&postcount=26
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1864798&postcount=59
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=255737&postcount=1
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1904451&postcount=407
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1904852&postcount=462
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1905030&postcount=482
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=579568&postcount=11

I have been discussing this subject with Catholics on this forum for a long time, long before you came along. This post is a typical example. It was posted about a year ago:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1860288&postcount=41

Let’s see who is doing the ranting now. It would be nice if you at least had the courtesy to admit that you were wrong. Vain hope, I fear.

zerinus
 
You know, I have no problem admitting when I am wrong. See this.

In looking at the context of the posts you gave, it is very clear that the posts fell into several categories.

Only four of the posts you linked to said the Catholic Church “wrote” the Bible. The reminder said the Catholic Church “gave us” the Bible. To claim that these two terms mean the same thing makes me wonder if English is your first language, or if there is some other reason for you to publicly try to equate these terms.

The Catholic Church did give the Bible to the world. They did it by determining the canon, assembling it and preserving it. If you actually read the posts and the threads, you know that you are incorrect.

Of the four posters that said the Church “wrote” the Bible, one was not Catholic.

In two other cases, they used the term “wrote” in the sense that the editor of a magazine “writes” the magazine. It is very clear they meant that the Church determined the canon of scripture. None of these people believe that some guys got together and put words on paper. When you make such claims, you are just advertising your, well, I am too polite to say that.

Finally, the one post which quoted was an explanation that since all the New Testament Authors were Catholic Christians that logically a person could claim that the Church wrote the Bible. Additionally, it is clear from the context of the entire thread that they were referring to the New Testament only. While that is an interesting intellectual position, the complexity of the logic is easily lost on those who are not well educated, not well informed, and/or who are enemies of the Church.

So really none of the posts you made in attempting to support your assertion actually do that. It looks like you are simply seeing what you want to see.
Let’s see who is doing the ranting now. It would be nice if you at least had the courtesy to admit that you were wrong. Vain hope, I fear.
A rant would be rambling sentences that say nothing, contain or are based on falsehoods and express anger, and insult persons or groups. Often the grammar is poor and there are spelling errors. (Though I will admit, I make lots of typos!) Here are some examples.
Example 1
Example 2
Example 3
Example 4

You need to be a bit more careful in your writing style. There is a reason why your posts are getting deleted. And it has nothing to do with a you being a Mormon on a Catholic Apologetics site.
 
I get the impression from my Mormon friend that they look at the bible as a ‘lesser’ book and the bom as a ‘higher’ form of scripture. I heard a rant from him that the bible isn’t exactly a great source of scripture because the church had to vote on it and didn’t just know what was supposed to be in there. Whereas the bom was dictated to Joe Smith by God or some angel or gold stones or whatever. He seemed to think that the bible was somewhat flawed because it was the work of men, whereas the bom was a direct dictation from God.
 
so let’s see if we can reconcile what we have here:

God gave the Bible to us… everyone agree?

How did he do it? he revealed it to prophets (OT) and directly from Jesus in the flesh (Gospels) (although it should be noted that the Gospels were “documented” much later by apostles and/or their amanuenses) and Jesus Apostles gave direction based on what Christ had taught them (Epistles) then of course their is the apocalypse of John which is a somewhat special case. In any case these scriptures were written down at various times by various people and then the church that Christ established and entrusted with the authority to teach in his name (Catholic church) preserved the scriptures by literally writing them one copy at a time and then assembling them into the canon. This same church (catholic) has also preserved the context in which these writings were originally given as sacred Tradition. That way we know Gods message is and what it means.

this is in contrast to the LDS view of once there was a Bible and the Catholics kept messing with it until it was all wrong, then King James had it corrected (notice the beginning of an anglo-saxon/american ethnocentric view of the world by the LDS) even though there was no priesthood authority in the world (except for john and the 3 nephites) and then Jospeh Smith came and pulled out the nephite canon assembled by mormon unilaterally and extended by moroni and translated it into the same style english as king james. Joseph then “corrected” a few sections of the KJV Bible resulting in the “inspired version” but due to the copyright being held by the CofC (aka RLDS) the LDS choose to use the KJV but put more faith in the BoM as it is seen as “more accurate”.

It should be noted though that LDS practices are based on the D&C ( modern revelation to joseph smith) modified by the sitting prophet as necessary.

SO… you can choose to believe that Jesus established a church , gave us a bible and then in a single generation the church apostatized and corrupted the Bible and God left the world in darkness for almost 2000 years and then restored his gospel to white americans first and foremost OR…
you can be a Christian and believe that the one and only eternal God came to earth and established a church, entrusted it with his word and stayed with us all along through thick and thin and will remain with us always.

I know what I believe and the Holy Spirit confirms it… Glory be to the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit as it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be world without end Amen. Repent and be baptized, join in the communion of saints through the one, holy catholic and apostolic church.👍
 
Since Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, Jude, James, etc were Catholics I would say yes, Catholics did write the New Testament, inspired by God.

And they gave the Bible to us, with inspiration from the Holy Spirit.

The actual canon of the Bible was decided upon by a council of the Catholic Church, again inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Thank you Catholic Church and God!!!
 
You know, I have no problem admitting when I am wrong. See this.

In looking at the context of the posts you gave, it is very clear that the posts fell into several categories.

Only four of the posts you linked to said the Catholic Church “wrote” the Bible. The reminder said the Catholic Church “gave us” the Bible. To claim that these two terms mean the same thing makes me wonder if English is your first language, or if there is some other reason for you to publicly try to equate these terms.

The Catholic Church did give the Bible to the world. They did it by determining the canon, assembling it and preserving it. If you actually read the posts and the threads, you know that you are incorrect.

Of the four posters that said the Church “wrote” the Bible, one was not Catholic.

In two other cases, they used the term “wrote” in the sense that the editor of a magazine “writes” the magazine. It is very clear they meant that the Church determined the canon of scripture. None of these people believe that some guys got together and put words on paper. When you make such claims, you are just advertising your, well, I am too polite to say that.

Finally, the one post which quoted was an explanation that since all the New Testament Authors were Catholic Christians that logically a person could claim that the Church wrote the Bible. Additionally, it is clear from the context of the entire thread that they were referring to the New Testament only. While that is an interesting intellectual position, the complexity of the logic is easily lost on those who are not well educated, not well informed, and/or who are enemies of the Church.

So really none of the posts you made in attempting to support your assertion actually do that. It looks like you are simply seeing what you want to see.
That is a poor dodge and a wriggle out of a bad situation.
A rant would be rambling sentences that say nothing, contain or are based on falsehoods and express anger, and insult persons or groups. Often the grammar is poor and there are spelling errors. (Though I will admit, I make lots of typos!) Here are some examples.
Thank you for giving us such a good description of your own posts.
You need to be a bit more careful in your writing style. There is a reason why your posts are getting deleted. And it has nothing to do with a you being a Mormon on a Catholic Apologetics site.
My posts were not deleted. I would have kicked up a big fuss about it if it had been! My browser had got stuck into an old version of the web page, and kept bringing that up instead of renewing it through the internet. Internet Explorer stores every Web page you visit in a temporary folder so that it can load them up more quickly next time, than it would by pulling them off the Internet every time. But when you refresh a page it should pull it directly off the Internet. Well, my IE had got stuck in that saved file, and just wasn’t renewing it. So I switched over to Firefox and everything worked fine. IE also works fine now. It fixed itself eventually.

zerinus
 
Since Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, Jude, James, etc were Catholics I would say yes, Catholics did write the New Testament, inspired by God.

And they gave the Bible to us, with inspiration from the Holy Spirit.

The actual canon of the Bible was decided upon by a council of the Catholic Church, again inspired by the Holy Spirit.

Thank you Catholic Church and God!!!
“Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Paul, Peter, Jude, James, etc” were not “Catholics”. It looks like you missed my post which I had linked to earlier. Here it is, posted once more for you:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=1860288&postcount=41

They were plain old Christians. There was no such thing as “Catholic” in those days.

zerinus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top