R
Ridgerunner
Guest
I don’t doubt you are right about the ones where you are, and as I said, the ones that once flooded into the area where I live, but pretty much drifted off by now, might have been a slightly different kind of Mormons. (Though they certainly were LDS, not RLDS) Most seemed to be from California, and that might have explained a lot. But the ones I knew, and I knew a goodly number, would tell you as plain as could be if you asked, that when the “time of tribulation” came there would be no sharing with Gentiles to it. That was a whole different thing from some momentary natural disaster, for which they might have been more generous-minded.My Mormon relatives are food storers, and when need arises anywhere – lilke floods in Idaho some years ago, a lot of that food went to help the disaster area. It wasn’t held in reserve for Mormons. They distributed it wherever it was needed.
Heck, guys! Give credit where credit is due. This is one “tradition of men” that definitely builds up independence for the family, fellowship for the community, and charity for those outside the fold.
That really bothered a lot of people around here, all of whom knew it. I had some cattle then, and I remember drinking beer with some hill folk after a hot, sweaty afternoon working with them, and some of the men started talking about it. There was serious, serious resentment of that attitude. Real anger. Anyway, I proposed that if the “tribulation” came, we would all get together and butcher my cattle first and eat them with whatever anybody had in his garden, then, if things didn’t get better, we would all get our guns and go see what the Mormons were hiding. It was a joke, meant to defuse the anger, and everybody thought it was a hoot, but there is no doubt whatever in my mind that is exactly what would have happened if some mega-disaster had occurred. I wonder, too, which “survival strategy” would have been more successful. I think I know.