I am not sure I understand what you are saying here. So forgive me if my post sounds a little brusque.
I went to Confession and I had a long talk with the priest who seemed a lot more understanding and a whole lot less dogmatic than your response indicates you are.
I did what I needed to do and I have made it to Mass every weekend since then. I have received absolution and I fully intend to keep attending Mass unless there are legitimate reasons that I can’t.
If you are referring to the fact that I lived with someone and still went to Mass but not Confession, I seriously doubt that I am the first or will be the last person to do that.
The bottom line is that only the person and the priest can look at the circumstances and decide if it is a serious sin or not.
You aren’t being brusque, and I don’t mean to be, either.
I think you don’t understand what I’m saying here. I’m saying there are objective moral laws–that is, there is an objective measure of what is and isn’t a grave matter. Choosing to live with someone who is not your spouse as if they were your spouse is a grave matter. Always was, still is. Have I done something similar? Oh, yes. You aren’t the first, you won’t be the last, neither was I, but I still look back and think, “What was I thinking?” It was wrong, I shouldn’t have done it. God’s way was the better way, as in the difference between night and day. I would do you wrong if I were to gloss over that, even though you don’t seem to be saying anything otherwise.
Having said that, that a choice is gravely wrong in an objective sense is not the end of the matter. You are right about that. I don’t just mean that there are other questions that go to appreciation of gravity and whether the person has the self-control to do otherwise: that is, is it a mortal sin? I mean that confessors also look at what is the most likely course to end the situation, rather than make it worse. If you go to a doctor with a terrible tumor, there are times when there needs to be some treatment before surgery. He won’t always just say, “Wait here, I’m going to go down the hall and get the surgeon, you’re having this thing out right now”…and I don’t just mean that the patient would probably be in the parking lot before the door closed behind the doctor. So even if it is objectively a mortal sin (and your priest discerns that, not me), the priest has to decide what the most likely way is to get the penitent out of it. That is beyond my job description, you are right about that, too. Even the physicians have their disagreements, and this is a case where I never “went to medical school”, let alone practiced medicine.
Even the simple can know, though, that it is far better to go to Mass while in a situation like that than not to, even if it goes on for years. You did the right thing. Would you have done better to end the situation sooner? Yes, and I would, too. But going to Mass is a great grace towards that, in all but a very few unusual situations, as long as the person refrains from recieving the Eucharist when they are aware of being in an objectively grave situation. Yes, you absolutely did the right thing. Keep going to Mass and thirsting for God. That won’t ever steer you wrong.