O
onmyknees
Guest
If I go to an occasion of mortal sin for me, is this a mortal sin if I don’t fall into the mortal sin while I am there?
It* can* be…yes.If I go to an occasion of mortal sin for me, is this a mortal sin if I don’t fall into the mortal sin while I am there?
lets say you were a crack head at one point in your life, but you have kicked the addiction. if you go to a place where you know they will be smoking crack, i am v ery certian that that situation would be a mortal sinIf I go to an occasion of mortal sin for me, is this a mortal sin if I don’t fall into the mortal sin while I am there?
It can be…Thank you all for your answers. I sometimes fall to where it becomes a mortal sin but sometimes I don’t so I think you are saying that it would still be mortal sin to go there.
It can be sinful to put oneself into an near occasion of sin…and can even be mortal sin. We are obliged actually to avoid “near occasions” of mortal sin in general…catholicreference.net/index.cfm?id=35228I have to disagree with the previous posts. Temptation and “near occasion” of sin is NOT a sin. For example let’s say that a person has a problem with internet porn. Well then obviously going online would be a near occasion of sin. Perhaps it would be wise to either get offline for awhile or make sure that somehow your viewing is monitored. BUT merely going on the computer is NOT a sin. Even if while you are sitting there you might be tempted to go to an inappropriate website. Once you make the deliberate choice to click and go then the sin begins.
In our act of contrition we ask God to help us avoid the near occasion of sin since it will very likely lead you to sin. In fact the very phrase NEAR occasion of sin states that you are NOT in sin. So I would have to say that one should not worry if they were an alcoholc and walk in and out of a bar. Not advisable but definitely not a sin… My two cents… teachccd
Good ideaThank you teachccd, bilop, and Bookcat again. I am just going to really try to avoid this near occasion of sin unless I have to go there for a good reason. The next time I go to confession I will run this by my confessor.
May God continue to bless you all.
intriguing i never thought about in the light of that internet example…I have to disagree with the previous posts. Temptation and “near occasion” of sin is NOT a sin. For example let’s say that a person has a problem with internet porn. Well then obviously going online would be a near occasion of sin. Perhaps it would be wise to either get offline for awhile or make sure that somehow your viewing is monitored. BUT merely going on the computer is NOT a sin. Even if while you are sitting there you might be tempted to go to an inappropriate website. Once you make the deliberate choice to click and go then the sin begins.
In our act of contrition we ask God to help us avoid the near occasion of sin since it will very likely lead you to sin. In fact the very phrase NEAR occasion of sin states that you are NOT in sin. So I would have to say that one should not worry if they were an alcoholc and walk in and out of a bar. Not advisable but definitely not a sin… My two cents… teachccd
We will have to agree to disagree on this one. A “near” occasion of sin is not a sin in and of itself especially a mortal sin. If you are not supposed to eat sugar but you have a sweet tooth you would be highly advised to avoid the temptation of sweets. But merely sniffing the desert tray will not affect your blood level. Yes, you could very well sneak a taste and by being there you really have to be disciplined not to but the act of eating the sweets is what will do the harm not the being there.It can be sinful to put oneself into an near occasion of sin…and can even be mortal sin. We are obliged actually to avoid “near occasions” of mortal sin in general…catholicreference.net/index.cfm?id=35228
“Well then obviously going online would be a near occasion of sin.”
Maybe …maybe not…a near occasion of sin is something that generally leads one into sin… (but I do think the person should take the necessary precautions such as getting blocking software etc)…
If one knows that going to a particular place etc is likely to lead them into mortal sin…then this is a near occasion and they are to avoid it normally. And there can be sin if they intentionally put themselves into that near occasion …particularly if they are morally certain they will fall.
And in the classic act of contrition we *resolve *to avoid near occasions…
I firmly resolve with the help of Thy grace to sin no more and to avoid the near occasion of sin. Amen.
Some near occasions of sin may not be sinful at all…for example … perhaps when one has no choice and is placed in the situation and must remain…but again much could be said …and the advice of a confessor in some cases is particularly warranted.
Anyhow some near occasions are sinful to put oneself in…and some are even grave matters …again for example when one is morally certain that one will fall into the mortal sin in question.
There is much that can go into such a discussion. And one ought not to scruple about it either…
But yes …temptation and near occasions of sin can happen and there is no sin at all…but rather virtue.
I would have to refer you to the Moral Theologians…for this is part of the understanding in the Church of near occasions of sin…that theythem selves can be a sin to willing enter or remain in…(again there is much one needs to distinguish here…as to when it becomes a sin…that somethings are unavoidable or necessary …or I would think when one has the good enough reason to do so and one judges one is not morally certain one will fall etc…)We will have to agree to disagree on this one. A “near” occasion of sin is not a sin in and of itself especially a mortal sin. If you are not supposed to eat sugar but you have a sweet tooth you would be highly advised to avoid the temptation of sweets. But merely sniffing the desert tray will not affect your blood level. Yes, you could very well sneak a taste and by being there you really have to be disciplined not to but the act of eating the sweets is what will do the harm not the being there.
In our Act of Contrition we pray that by the help of God’s grace we will sin no more and avoid the near occasions of sin. So, yes, we should very much avoid the near occasions of sin but a near occasion is not a sin. It could never be unless one commits the act. So if you like to gossip you may want to avoid the water cooler at work but if you go over to wet your whistle just keep your mouth shut and no sin is committed… God bless… teachccd
That’s what I am getting at… Life is really a near occasion of sin when one notices the zillions of temptations surrounding us daily. But if there are particular circumstances that we should avoid then we must resolve to avoid them. But I still hold firm to my understanding that a “near occasion” is not a sin until the act that is to be avoided is committed. In the Act of Contrition we frimly resolve to avoid the near occasions of sin precisely because we are likely to fall into sin but not because the “near occasion” is, in and of itself, a sin. If heights make me dizzy then I should at all costs avoid going to high places. But the mountain top is not a problem unless I start to get dizzy. If I am on top of that mountain and for some unknown reason I do not get dizzy then the mountain top is not an issue. Am I crazy for being there given the probable results? Most likely… and that is why I should avoid the whole scenerio… I hope that this makes sense but I am not a moral theologian soBut I certainly understand what you are getting at…for something can very well be a near occasion of sin…but not yet any sin. This is true …I agree here.
One can speak that way…something was a temptation and even became a near occasion of sin…but one walked away when he realized it and did not sin…
or he had a very good reason to be there…it was necessary…and and not being morally certain he would fall…he tried to make it as remote as possible after talking with his confessor for example…
etc etc etc.
Life may have many “occasions of sin” but many many of these are “remote occasions of sin” particularly in regards to mortal sin they do not generally or always lead us to mortal sin. The theologians etc will tell one that yes it can be sinful to willingly enter into a near occasion of sin…not always of course…but yes it can be sinful. For example if one is placing oneself into a situation one knows (morally certain) one will commit that mortal sin.That’s what I am getting at… Life is really a near occasion of sin when one notices the zillions of temptations surrounding us daily. But if there are particular circumstances that we should avoid then we must resolve to avoid them. But I still hold firm to my understanding that a “near occasion” is not a sin until the act that is to be avoided is committed. In the Act of Contrition we frimly resolve to avoid the near occasions of sin precisely because we are likely to fall into sin but not because the “near occasion” is, in and of itself, a sin. If heights make me dizzy then I should at all costs avoid going to high places. But the mountain top is not a problem unless I start to get dizzy. If I am on top of that mountain and for some unknown reason I do not get dizzy then the mountain top is not an issue. Am I crazy for being there given the probable results? Most likely… and that is why I should avoid the whole scenerio… I hope that this makes sense but I am not a moral theologian so… God bless, teachccd