Mortal Sins?...and a little more

  • Thread starter Thread starter alongexpected
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

alongexpected

Guest
Hello, just had a few thoughts here…

Does everyone really believe the whole concept of mortal sins? I mean, how in God’s name could masturbation, skipping Church, fornicating, etc., be on par with murder, rape, stealing, and many others? NO ONE is getting hurt with the first group, and, of course, the second is extremely hurtful. You have to admit that makes zero sense.

Secondly, do you really believe that these “mortal” sins are a Hell-sentence (if left unconfessed)? If that’s true, then, I’d say…maybe 95% of people are damned. Does that seem logical/right to you?

Also, think about this. The majority of younger people (20-somethings) tend to be less religious and pious, while older people (50+) tend to be much more religious and pious. So let’s say there’s a 22-year-old who’s a good human being, but breaks some of those Catholic taboos like missing Mass and fornicating. He dies suddenly with unconfessed sins. Then, there’s an older couple who looks back on their life when they were younger and they think about all the sex they had before they were married (yes, the VAST majority of Catholics, and all people, have sex many times before they’re married. Probably not the vast majority of the people posting on this forum, but we do not represent the average Catholic) and all the Church they had skipped over the years. Because of their advanced age and how they’ve settled and calmed down more over the years they confess those “sins”. So they’re forgiven and are good to go? What if they had died suddenly years earlier when they were “wilder” like the first guy? Can you see the absurdity of such a line of thinking?

Why can’t people love others, do a good job at work, have good fun with their friends, not go to Mass, live with their significant others, and treat others like they’d want to be treated? How do we KNOW that such acts will condemn one to Hell? Because of what’s said in the Bible? If you ask me, almost everything in the Bible cannot be taken literally or be applied to today. Don’t even get me started on the Old Testament. Slaves should be obeying their masters, women are subservient to men, guys can’t sit on chairs that menstruating women had sat on, incest, Joshua’s army killing/enslaving everyone inside Jericho…should I continue? Those books were written very long ago and those things were common then and not ok today. As for symbol stories revealing truth about God’s plan the OT is fine, but when I hear that the evidence for homosexuality’s “wrongness” comes from Leviticus (don’t lie with a man like a woman, it’s an abomination), that’s stupid, because, well, the OT also tells you to kill/enslave your enemies! Instead of using a 2000-3000 year old book to resolve current social issues, use something else: common sense.

Fine, you say. The Old Testament is outdated and shouldn’t be taken literally. The New Testament, though, is rooted in absolute fact and should be taken literally. Maybe. I have a couple of problems, though. One is about the “committing lust with your mind” nonsense. I’m sorry, but again, if this is a really bad thing to do then, yes, the VAST majority of all people are committing grave sin. Think about this one, too. Murder is equal to thinking about having sex with someone a lot. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE!!?

Also, I was reading about the Resurrection in the Gospels and I noticed discrepancies in them. Matthew says “As the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to the tomb…there was a great earthquake…an angel came and rolled back the stone and sat on it.”

Mark says “Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome went to the tomb. When they looked up, they saw that the tomb had been rolled back.” No mention of angels visibly rolling it back.

Luke and John are very similar to Mark in that the stone was already rolled away.

Finally, (I just noticed this!) Mark says how the women were so scared about what they had seen, that they didn’t tell anyone about it, while in Luke and John they immediately go tell the apostles about it!

So…comparing Matthew to the other three about the stone, only one (or none, actually) can be right. Ditto with running to tell the apostles. We’ve determined that there at least two errancies in the Gospels. What else could be erroneous?..

The way I see it, no one can be absolutely sure that there is a God, or that masturbation is wrong, or that a man named Jesus was killed and then lived again, or breaking a commandment is a grave sin, etc. No one has seen God (don’t bring up Moses), no one has talked to God and asked him if cohabitation or going to Europe with your boyfriend for 3-6 months is a sin. No one knows if Catholicism, or any religion is the “right” one and the way you should be living your life.

What you probably should do is treat others the way you want to be treated, thank and respect God for the blessings in your life, don’t be so judgemental of others or worry about if missing Church on vacation is really bad, and remember what Jesus said about the Pharisees (what people in this forum seem to be doing), how they were living too much by the letter of the law, and not enough by the spirit of it.

God Bless.
 
So is this post a rant? or do you actually want someone to respond? There is alot of material in your post. IMHO perhaps you should narrow it down so a discussion can actually take place:shrug: Just a thought.
 
Yeah…I could’ve broken it up into two or more parts. But I really think there’s some thought-provoking ideas in there that are worth commenting on.
 
Yeah…I could’ve broken it up into two or more parts. But I really think there’s some thought-provoking ideas in there that are worth commenting on.
Yes, thought-provoking ideas that most of us have heard and discussed a thousand times before. 😉 If you search the forums, you’ll find many threads already exist that discuss these issues at length.

Welcome to CAF, by the way. 👋 😉
 
I’m a recent new member and can well believe that the subject matter contained in your post has been discussed at length in various threads…but I was amused by the use of upper case letters in your first paragraph…“NOONE gets hurt”…so to amuse you back here’s my response to your post…REALLY???
 
You raise some interesting points, but there are just too many different topics to include in one thread. You have about five different major topics, ranging from the differences in the Gospels, to which scriptures take precedence, to what is meant by sin.

As others have said, all of this has been discussed before, but you can still start a new discussion. However, you need to discuss one thing at a time, and start them in the right forum category.
 
We tend to define sin as breaking a rule. Minor sins break minor rules and are called venial, major sins break major rules and are called mortal. This is the law approach. Christ endorsed the law when he said:

“Amen, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or the smallest part of a letter will pass from the law, until all things have taken place. Therefore, whoever breaks one of the least of these commandments and teaches others to do so will be called least in the kingdom of heaven. But whoever obeys and teaches these commandments will be called greatest in the kingdom of heaven.”

Ultimately we are called to purity of heart, for it is the pure of heart who shall see God. Rule following is a good way to start out, but the goal is to eliminate as much lust, greed, avarice, envy, and pride from our hearts as we can (with God’s help) so that one day we won’t want to break any rules. St. Ignatius of Loyola described the three stages of humility as (1) you would rather die than commit a mortal sin (2) you would rather die than commit a venial sin (3) you decide to give all your possessions to the poor and dedicate your life to Christ. It sounds like he is talking about breaking rules, but really he is talking about purity of heart for the love of God. If you see sin as anything that destroys this purity you will have less trouble understanding why sensual indulgence pulls us away from spiritual devotion. They tend to conflict with each other. I have no idea how many people actually believe in the Fatima apparitions, but I think it is worth noting that Mary revealed to Jacinta that more people wind up in hell due to sins of the flesh than for any other reason.
 
Hello, just had a few thoughts here…

Does everyone really believe the whole concept of mortal sins? I mean, how in God’s name could masturbation, skipping Church, fornicating, etc., be on par with murder, rape, stealing, and many others? NO ONE is getting hurt with the first group, and, of course, the second is extremely hurtful. You have to admit that makes zero sense.

Secondly, do you really believe that these “mortal” sins are a Hell-sentence (if left unconfessed)? If that’s true, then, I’d say…maybe 95% of people are damned. Does that seem logical/right to you?

Also, think about this. The majority of younger people (20-somethings) tend to be less religious and pious, while older people (50+) tend to be much more religious and pious. So let’s say there’s a 22-year-old who’s a good human being, but breaks some of those Catholic taboos like missing Mass and fornicating. He dies suddenly with unconfessed sins. Then, there’s an older couple who looks back on their life when they were younger and they think about all the sex they had before they were married (yes, the VAST majority of Catholics, and all people, have sex many times before they’re married. Probably not the vast majority of the people posting on this forum, but we do not represent the average Catholic) and all the Church they had skipped over the years. Because of their advanced age and how they’ve settled and calmed down more over the years they confess those “sins”. So they’re forgiven and are good to go? What if they had died suddenly years earlier when they were “wilder” like the first guy? Can you see the absurdity of such a line of thinking?

Why can’t people love others, do a good job at work, have good fun with their friends, not go to Mass, live with their significant others, and treat others like they’d want to be treated? How do we KNOW that such acts will condemn one to Hell? Because of what’s said in the Bible? If you ask me, almost everything in the Bible cannot be taken literally or be applied to today. Don’t even get me started on the Old Testament. Slaves should be obeying their masters, women are subservient to men, guys can’t sit on chairs that menstruating women had sat on, incest, Joshua’s army killing/enslaving everyone inside Jericho…should I continue? Those books were written very long ago and those things were common then and not ok today. As for symbol stories revealing truth about God’s plan the OT is fine, but when I hear that the evidence for homosexuality’s “wrongness” comes from Leviticus (don’t lie with a man like a woman, it’s an abomination), that’s stupid, because, well, the OT also tells you to kill/enslave your enemies! Instead of using a 2000-3000 year old book to resolve current social issues, use something else: common sense.

Fine, you say. The Old Testament is outdated and shouldn’t be taken literally. The New Testament, though, is rooted in absolute fact and should be taken literally. Maybe. I have a couple of problems, though. One is about the “committing lust with your mind” nonsense. I’m sorry, but again, if this is a really bad thing to do then, yes, the VAST majority of all people are committing grave sin. Think about this one, too. Murder is equal to thinking about having sex with someone a lot. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE!!?

Also, I was reading about the Resurrection in the Gospels and I noticed discrepancies in them. Matthew says “As the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to the tomb…there was a great earthquake…an angel came and rolled back the stone and sat on it.”

Mark says “Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome went to the tomb. When they looked up, they saw that the tomb had been rolled back.” No mention of angels visibly rolling it back.

Luke and John are very similar to Mark in that the stone was already rolled away.

Finally, (I just noticed this!) Mark says how the women were so scared about what they had seen, that they didn’t tell anyone about it, while in Luke and John they immediately go tell the apostles about it!

So…comparing Matthew to the other three about the stone, only one (or none, actually) can be right. Ditto with running to tell the apostles. We’ve determined that there at least two errancies in the Gospels. What else could be erroneous?..

The way I see it, no one can be absolutely sure that there is a God, or that masturbation is wrong, or that a man named Jesus was killed and then lived again, or breaking a commandment is a grave sin, etc. No one has seen God (don’t bring up Moses), no one has talked to God and asked him if cohabitation or going to Europe with your boyfriend for 3-6 months is a sin. No one knows if Catholicism, or any religion is the “right” one and the way you should be living your life.

What you probably should do is treat others the way you want to be treated, thank and respect God for the blessings in your life, don’t be so judgemental of others or worry about if missing Church on vacation is really bad, and remember what Jesus said about the Pharisees (what people in this forum seem to be doing), how they were living too much by the letter of the law, and not enough by the spirit of it.

God Bless.
Way too many topics in this thread … what is your question?
 
Yea, you wrote too much, I didn’t read it all. But, I don’t get how you think it’s OK to miss church, have premarital sex, masturbate, etc… and get into heaven? so basically the only people who sin are those that commit murder??? If that were the case than it would be realllyyy easy to get to heaven. And, getting into heaven is not supposed to be easy!!
 
Hello, just had a few thoughts here…

Does everyone really believe the whole concept of mortal sins? I mean, how in God’s name could masturbation, skipping Church, fornicating, etc., be on par with murder, rape, stealing, and many others? NO ONE is getting hurt with the first group, and, of course, the second is extremely hurtful. You have to admit that makes zero sense.

Secondly, do you really believe that these “mortal” sins are a Hell-sentence (if left unconfessed)? If that’s true, then, I’d say…maybe 95% of people are damned. Does that seem logical/right to you?

Also, think about this. The majority of younger people (20-somethings) tend to be less religious and pious, while older people (50+) tend to be much more religious and pious. So let’s say there’s a 22-year-old who’s a good human being, but breaks some of those Catholic taboos like missing Mass and fornicating. He dies suddenly with unconfessed sins. Then, there’s an older couple who looks back on their life when they were younger and they think about all the sex they had before they were married (yes, the VAST majority of Catholics, and all people, have sex many times before they’re married. Probably not the vast majority of the people posting on this forum, but we do not represent the average Catholic) and all the Church they had skipped over the years. Because of their advanced age and how they’ve settled and calmed down more over the years they confess those “sins”. So they’re forgiven and are good to go? What if they had died suddenly years earlier when they were “wilder” like the first guy? Can you see the absurdity of such a line of thinking?

Why can’t people love others, do a good job at work, have good fun with their friends, not go to Mass, live with their significant others, and treat others like they’d want to be treated? How do we KNOW that such acts will condemn one to Hell? Because of what’s said in the Bible? If you ask me, almost everything in the Bible cannot be taken literally or be applied to today. Don’t even get me started on the Old Testament. Slaves should be obeying their masters, women are subservient to men, guys can’t sit on chairs that menstruating women had sat on, incest, Joshua’s army killing/enslaving everyone inside Jericho…should I continue? Those books were written very long ago and those things were common then and not ok today. As for symbol stories revealing truth about God’s plan the OT is fine, but when I hear that the evidence for homosexuality’s “wrongness” comes from Leviticus (don’t lie with a man like a woman, it’s an abomination), that’s stupid, because, well, the OT also tells you to kill/enslave your enemies! Instead of using a 2000-3000 year old book to resolve current social issues, use something else: common sense.

Fine, you say. The Old Testament is outdated and shouldn’t be taken literally. The New Testament, though, is rooted in absolute fact and should be taken literally. Maybe. I have a couple of problems, though. One is about the “committing lust with your mind” nonsense. I’m sorry, but again, if this is a really bad thing to do then, yes, the VAST majority of all people are committing grave sin. Think about this one, too. Murder is equal to thinking about having sex with someone a lot. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE!!?

Also, I was reading about the Resurrection in the Gospels and I noticed discrepancies in them. Matthew says “As the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to the tomb…there was a great earthquake…an angel came and rolled back the stone and sat on it.”

Mark says “Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome went to the tomb. When they looked up, they saw that the tomb had been rolled back.” No mention of angels visibly rolling it back.

Luke and John are very similar to Mark in that the stone was already rolled away.

Finally, (I just noticed this!) Mark says how the women were so scared about what they had seen, that they didn’t tell anyone about it, while in Luke and John they immediately go tell the apostles about it!

So…comparing Matthew to the other three about the stone, only one (or none, actually) can be right. Ditto with running to tell the apostles. We’ve determined that there at least two errancies in the Gospels. What else could be erroneous?..

The way I see it, no one can be absolutely sure that there is a God, or that masturbation is wrong, or that a man named Jesus was killed and then lived again, or breaking a commandment is a grave sin, etc. No one has seen God (don’t bring up Moses), no one has talked to God and asked him if cohabitation or going to Europe with your boyfriend for 3-6 months is a sin. No one knows if Catholicism, or any religion is the “right” one and the way you should be living your life.

What you probably should do is treat others the way you want to be treated, thank and respect God for the blessings in your life, don’t be so judgemental of others or worry about if missing Church on vacation is really bad, and remember what Jesus said about the Pharisees (what people in this forum seem to be doing), how they were living too much by the letter of the law, and not enough by the spirit of it.

God Bless.
If you do not believe what is in the bible, than how are u a catholic??!!
 
Hello, just had a few thoughts here…

Does everyone really believe the whole concept of mortal sins? I mean, how in God’s name could masturbation, skipping Church, fornicating, etc., be on par with murder, rape, stealing, and many others? NO ONE is getting hurt with the first group, and, of course, the second is extremely hurtful. You have to admit that makes zero sense.
Some sins cause more physical pain and physical evil than others, but that doesn’t mean that the person was rejecting God any less than the person who commits a private sin. Sin is a rejection of God, goodness, and love, and a complete rejection of those things is possible by masturbating to pornography because you’ve opposed natural law and what is good for your body in favor for self-love. Remember, God told us to love our neighbor as ourselves.
Secondly, do you really believe that these “mortal” sins are a Hell-sentence (if left unconfessed)? If that’s true, then, I’d say…maybe 95% of people are damned. Does that seem logical/right to you?
No, it is not logical or right that 95% of people choose to reject God. But that’s their choice. Christ suffered and died to keep us out of hell, but he did not take away our free will.
Also, think about this. The majority of younger people (20-somethings) tend to be less religious and pious, while older people (50+) tend to be much more religious and pious. So let’s say there’s a 22-year-old who’s a good human being, but breaks some of those Catholic taboos like missing Mass and fornicating. He dies suddenly with unconfessed sins. Then, there’s an older couple who looks back on their life when they were younger and they think about all the sex they had before they were married (yes, the VAST majority of Catholics, and all people, have sex many times before they’re married. Probably not the vast majority of the people posting on this forum, but we do not represent the average Catholic) and all the Church they had skipped over the years. Because of their advanced age and how they’ve settled and calmed down more over the years they confess those “sins”. So they’re forgiven and are good to go? What if they had died suddenly years earlier when they were “wilder” like the first guy? Can you see the absurdity of such a line of thinking?
Jesus warned us to always be prepared to stand to judgment before the Son of Man. He will come like a “thief in the night.” Read Mark 13: 32-37, Luke 21: 34-36, and Matthew 24: 36-44. Sin is no joke. When we are living in mortal sin, we are but a heartbeat away from hell, so don’t do it!
Why can’t people love others, do a good job at work, have good fun with their friends, not go to Mass, live with their significant others, and treat others like they’d want to be treated? How do we KNOW that such acts will condemn one to Hell? Because of what’s said in the Bible? If you ask me, almost everything in the Bible cannot be taken literally or be applied to today. Don’t even get me started on the Old Testament. Slaves should be obeying their masters, women are subservient to men, guys can’t sit on chairs that menstruating women had sat on, incest, Joshua’s army killing/enslaving everyone inside Jericho…should I continue? Those books were written very long ago and those things were common then and not ok today. As for symbol stories revealing truth about God’s plan the OT is fine, but when I hear that the evidence for homosexuality’s “wrongness” comes from Leviticus (don’t lie with a man like a woman, it’s an abomination), that’s stupid, because, well, the OT also tells you to kill/enslave your enemies! Instead of using a 2000-3000 year old book to resolve current social issues, use something else: common sense.
Wow a lot to address here. Try reading Hebrews 8:7-13. It may help you understand why the Old Testament stuff is hard for us to swallow today. Maybe this essay by Jimmy Akin will help too: jimmyakin.org/2007/02/hard_sayings_of.html

All you need to know about why homosexual marriage and relations are not what God made us for can be found in Matt 19: 1-12.
Fine, you say. The Old Testament is outdated and shouldn’t be taken literally. The New Testament, though, is rooted in absolute fact and should be taken literally. Maybe. I have a couple of problems, though. One is about the “committing lust with your mind” nonsense. I’m sorry, but again, if this is a really bad thing to do then, yes, the VAST majority of all people are committing grave sin. Think about this one, too. Murder is equal to thinking about having sex with someone a lot. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE!!?
Makes perfect sense to me. Your personal convictions about the seriousness of certain sins is not the determinant of morality. I’m assuming you’ve grown up in our highly sexualized America your whole life so sex outside of marriage and fantasizing about sex doesn’t seem so abnormal or bad to you, while murder is something that you’ve probably never witnessed or experienced. Murder causes much more direct physical evil, but both sins involve a rejection of God and the way he created us.
Also, I was reading about the Resurrection in the Gospels and I noticed discrepancies in them. Matthew says “As the first day of the week was dawning, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to the tomb…there was a great earthquake…an angel came and rolled back the stone and sat on it.”
Mark says “Mary Magdalene, Mary, the mother of James, and Salome went to the tomb. When they looked up, they saw that the tomb had been rolled back.” No mention of angels visibly rolling it back.
Luke and John are very similar to Mark in that the stone was already rolled away.
Finally, (I just noticed this!) Mark says how the women were so scared about what they had seen, that they didn’t tell anyone about it, while in Luke and John they immediately go tell the apostles about it!
So…comparing Matthew to the other three about the stone, only one (or none, actually) can be right. Ditto with running to tell the apostles. We’ve determined that there at least two errancies in the Gospels. What else could be erroneous?..
These discrepancies are very insignificant and have been known for centuries. Considering that the Gospels were written decades after Jesus’ life, it’s not like these details were the ones early Christians were primarily concerning themselves with when they were passing along the oral tradition and preaching Jesus’ words to others. Do they change the fact that the tomb was empty and that Jesus had risen? THOSE are the facts that the first believers would share the most with others, not whether the women were scared and told the apostles immediately or not.

(post continued below…)
 
(…continued)
The way I see it, no one can be absolutely sure that there is a God, or that masturbation is wrong, or that a man named Jesus was killed and then lived again, or breaking a commandment is a grave sin, etc. No one has seen God (don’t bring up Moses), no one has talked to God and asked him if cohabitation or going to Europe with your boyfriend for 3-6 months is a sin. No one knows if Catholicism, or any religion is the “right” one and the way you should be living your life.
What you probably should do is treat others the way you want to be treated, thank and respect God for the blessings in your life, don’t be so judgemental of others or worry about if missing Church on vacation is really bad, and remember what Jesus said about the Pharisees (what people in this forum seem to be doing), how they were living too much by the letter of the law, and not enough by the spirit of it.
God Bless.
Do you see what you’ve done here? You’ve created your own personal religion by selecting only the teachings of Jesus that you like. Now what I want you to do is keep that religion the same for 2000 years, help build and sustain modern civilization, attract a billion followers, write thousands of books supporting it, defend it against all attackers, persevere through persecution…And while you’re at it, could you prophesy your death and resurrection to many people, then die and still have your followers believe in you and suffer for you afterwards?

“No one has seen God and no one has talked to God”??:hmmm::doh2:

Ever heard of Jesus Christ? 👍
 
Just came across a passage from “The Imitation of Christ” that pertains to the OP…
Pardon me also, and deal mercifully with me, as often as I think of
anything besides You in prayer. For I confess truly that I am
accustomed to be very much distracted. Very often I am not where
bodily I stand or sit; rather, I am where my thoughts carry me.
Where my thoughts are, there am I; and frequently my thoughts are
where my love is. That which naturally delights, or is by habit pleasing,
comes to me quickly. Hence You Who are Truth itself, have plainly
said: “For where your treasure is, there is your heart also.” If I love
heaven, I think willingly of heavenly things. If I love the world, I
rejoice at the happiness of the world and grieve at its troubles. If I love
the flesh, I often imagine things that are carnal. If I love the
spirit, I delight in thinking of spiritual matters. For whatever I love, I
am willing to speak and hear about.
Code:
           -------- Bk. 3, Chapter 48
 
This is not a point by point answer, and I don’t know if the poster will consider it an answer at all, let alone a sufficient one. Let me also admit that I am not a theologian or a biblical scholar. Nor do I pretend to truly know the mind of God, as no one truly does.

Personally, I was impressed with the discussions of St. Therese of Lisieux concerning sin, forgiveness, heaven and hell. She posited a moment (whether before or after physical death one could not tell as I recall) when all became clear; when the full and true nature of sin in its every effect would become manifest. (Actually, we can do that a lot more right now than we often let ourselves do it.) At that moment of total clarity, forgiveness would be offered, and the nature of that forgiveness, and the overwhelming humility it would take to accept it, would also be totally clear. So would God’s love and the nature of hell be totally clear.

Some, at that moment, would accept forgiveness and choose to love God, and some would reject it and choose to hate Him. Hard to picture that, in a way, but then there is this as well. Those who reject forgiveness and choose to hate God are, in effect, choosing themselves; choosing to worship themselves for all eternity knowing full well (as did Lucifer) what that meant, but still choosing themselves; wrapping themselves in a cocoon of self-love and self-absorption, forever; as bitter as we know that would have to be.

Now, when we live a life in which we consistently choose ourselves, are we not making ourselves into what we really want ourselves to be? And when we choose others and God Himself, are we not also making ourselves into what we want to be?

The simple case of masturbation. I don’t think the Church so much says that it’s like a bear trap under the snow; put your foot in it once and God snaps it shut on your leg. One must admit, however, that it’s absolutely an act of self-serving; an act of self-worship. We worship what’s in our eyes or in our heads; creatures of sexual affinity which we have invented ourselves. We are, in reality, making love to ourselves. The Church says that’s a deadly thing. We ought to channel our sexuality toward the REAL “other”, who might be delighted and fulfilled thereby; a real other that actually exists and is not, in effect, ourselves. There is giving involved in real lovemaking; often a great deal of it. There is fruitfulness of life in it; a fruitfulness that leads us to further giving to someone (children) that is not “me” alone. That’s why masturbation is potentially deadly. It’s a cocoon of self-love; of self-worship.

Human beings are much given to paganism writ large. By writ large, I mean that it goes beyond worshipping Zeus or golden calves. The essential nature of paganism is my desire to bend God (or the gods) to my will. If I burn 20 oxen to Zeus he will give me victory over the Trojans. If I sacrifice my child to Moloch, my ships will return to Carthage from India laden with pearls and gold. In truth, in pagan worship, though, we are really worshipping ourselves. If I bend the gods to my will, I am the greater god, and see myself that way.

We who are Christians are charged with abandoning paganism, but often succumb to it in many ways all the same. We all try to control God; some less than others. It’s a lifelong fight, and we succeed and we fail. And always, there is a God who never seems to tire of telling us that He loves us, but has a tough time convincing us of it and further persuading us that His love is the only thing that is ultimately sufficient for us.

And when we say “where is the proof of God’s existence”, we’re doing two things at once. On the one hand, we are, or may be, asking Him to reveal Himself to us; in the way, hopefully, that He wishes to reveal Himself. In that regard, I’m reminded of the story of Moses and the windstorm and the fire and the whisper. But we have to hold ourselves lightly in that inquiry because, on the other hand, we are also demanding that God do our will. “Show me in the way I want to be shown. Appear in the sky and knock a mountain over for me. THEN I will accept you.” Pagan. I am the greater god.

We let go of paganism with difficulty, because we let go of self-worship with difficulty. But if we ever really expect to “see” God, we have to be willing to approach it on His terms, not our own. To Christians, that means to see God in his creation, in His words and particularly in others, and to serve Him through the “other”. It’s a discipline not so easily approached or accepted. Not so easily achieved. And, as long as, on this earth, we have free will, we will always be like that. We could choose to virtually abandon free will and simply trust God thoroughly, and some saints have done that to an astounding (but imperfect) degree. But free will is inbuilt. It’s not just Adam and Eve who chose free will. We all do it, all the time, and among our choices is to follow the siren song of self-adoration. And sometimes the only way we can really overcome it is to practice humility in those ways we can manage.

And we should do that if St. Therese is even close to being right, because if I am not accepting of God’s terms now, then perhaps I will never be. And every year that goes by, I become more and more what I choose to be every day. And perhaps, then, when that moment of total clarity comes, I might choose to worship myself, alone, for all eternity. And that, to St. Therese, is what hell is, in its most fundamental and deadly attribute.

And she also said that even if she had committed every sin there was to commit, she would not fear God. She would not fear Him because she loved Him, notwithstanding that she could not bend Him to her will so she could see Him in the way she chose. How did she know that she loved Him? Because she acted on it. Love, of course, is an act of the will, not an emotional state. It is attraction, not love, when my breath catches at the beauty of my wife. It is love when I go out in the snow at 1:00 a.m. to get her a bottle of Seven-up when she has the flu and has been throwing up,and can only drink Seven-up to rehydrate herself, and will probably be angry with me when I get back for taking so long to get it while she suffered from thirst. And it’s love when I admit I was slow even though I’m persuaded intellectually that I wasn’t.

So, it’s a choice, really. And I pray yours will be made well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top