Most Annoying Misconceptions About Your Tradition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lokabrenna
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
L

Lokabrenna

Guest
I would say that every religion has a number of misconceptions circulating around among outsiders to the tradition. Are there ones that you find especially annoying?

Some I’ve seen include:

“All Pagans subscribe to the (Wiccan) Rede.”
“All Pagans worship a Goddess and a God.” (which is related to that last one)
“Pagans have no ethics/ethical systems.”

I could go on, but we’d be here all day. 🙂
 
All Pagans worship Satan.
All Pagans sacrifice babies.
All Pagans sacrifice animals.

Again I could go on and on too lol 😛
 
Well usually when I tell people I’m Pentecostal in my current area, people tend to assume that we’re not Trinitarian and/or that women have long skirts and hair. That’s probably because there is actually a rather large number of Oneness Pentecostal churches in my area.

Oh, and that we “babble.” That annoys me to no end, even worse I’ve heard some fellow Christians call it “demon possession.” That you disagree with it, fine. But demon possession?
 
There are so many misconceptions about Judaism that it’s hard to know where to begin. These misconceptions are not confined to Christians and other non-Jews, but some of them are also believed by many Jews, and even certain Orthodox Jews, who should know better.

One misconception is the belief that Judaism is a legalistic religion which is based on the letter of the Mosaic Law (Torah) rather than the spirit of the Law. This is definitely not correct. In fact, simply following the letter of the Law with no spirit is unacceptable. For example, while fasting is mandatory on Yom Kippur (except if health reasons forbid it; for example, a pregnant woman must NOT fast), fasting alone without prayer and reflection is considered an empty fast; even more so if one has in the back of one’s mind some non-spiritual reason for fasting, such as shedding a few pounds. In fact, according to the Rabbinical Sages (including Jesus), the Law is really divided into two parts: loving G-d and loving one’s fellow Man (and non-human creatures), and all the rest is commentary. Further, there are instances in which the Law must NOT be followed to the letter, mainly those which involve the health and life of human beings. Thus, for example, it is forbidden to follow the commandment to rest on the Sabbath if that would mean that, by so doing, one does not help save a human life. In fact, to save a life, one may disobey many of the Torah commandments. Likewise, if one’s health is in serious jeopardy unless one eats food that happens to be non-kosher, then one MUST eat such food despite the Law that forbids eating non-kosher food.

Another misconception, also relating to the Law, is that if one does not follow it to the letter, one is doomed to Hell. Even the most Orthodox Jews must admit they do not follow the Law in all its details all the time. First of all, of the 613 commandments of Torah, only about 300 can be practiced in the modern age. Secondly, sometimes one may slip up. The fact of the matter is, no one is perfect and G-d in His mercy will forgive us. What is important is one’s effort, one’s intentions, and one’s attempt to do better the next time.

Still another misconception–again with respect to the Torah–is that it is somehow impossible to follow. Even though, as I noted previously, everyone slips up now and again, Moses told the Hebrews that it is not at all impossible to follow G-d’s Law. It just takes discipline like everything else.

Finally, another misconception about Judaism–especially held by many Christians–is that the religion is somehow an “unfulfilled” Christianity since many Jews did/do not accept the divinity of Jesus as the Messiah or the idea of a Triune G-d. The word “Messiah” is not even mentioned in the Torah except once and with a small “m.” Although belief in the coming of the Messiah is one of the thirteen principles of faith according to Maimonides, it is not a view held by all Jews now or even in ancient times (the Sadducees, for example, did not believe in the concept or that of the resurrection of the dead, for that matter). While most Jews today do believe in Heaven and the eventual resurrection of the dead, this belief is not contingent upon the advent of a Messiah. In fact, according to Judaism, the Messiah is not thought of as a supernatural of deified being, but rather a human messenger sent by G-d for the purpose of ushering in a world without war and suffering.

These are only some of the misconceptions about Judaism. There are many more.
 
“There are Christians, and then there are Catholics.”

“I think Catholics worship the Pope.”

“Catholics bow down to idols.”

“People go confessing to the priest, begging for salvation.”

“You know that the Catholic Church is the most evil institution in the world, right?” (To this I said, “The Evil Empire of Kim Jong Ill and his minions have nothing on Benedict XVI. Riiiiiiight.”)

“Catholic priests aren’t supposed to marry, that’s why they touch little boys.”
 
For Christianity in general -
  • The God of the Old Testament was nasty and judgmental, while Jesus of the New Testament is gentle and forgiving.
For Protestantism -
  • Our services are “all about the preacher” and we ignore the Sacraments.
  • We believe the Eucharist is “just a symbol”.
  • The King James Bible doesn’t include the deuterocanonical books.
  • Our many denominations imply that each one believes different doctrines.
For Catholicism -
  • Priestly celibacy is a doctrine.
For Mormonism -
  • Mormons worship a “different Jesus”
 
I would say that every religion has a number of misconceptions circulating around among outsiders to the tradition. Are there ones that you find especially annoying?

Some I’ve seen include:

“All Pagans subscribe to the (Wiccan) Rede.”
“All Pagans worship a Goddess and a God.” (which is related to that last one)
“Pagans have no ethics/ethical systems.”

I could go on, but we’d be here all day. 🙂
“Lutherans believe in consubstantiation.”

“Faith alone means there’s no need to do good works.”

“Sola scriptura means a complete rejection of Tradition.”

“Luther removed books from the Bible.”

“Lutherans are too Catholic.” (In some ways we’re not Catholic enough.)

Jon

Jon
 
Pentecostals are ignorant (many Pentecostals are middle class and college educated),

Pentecostals are demon possessed (cheap shot),

Pentecostals handle snakes and drink poison (only a few in Appalachia)

Pentecostals are mentally imbalanced (once again cheap shot and no scholarly evidence),

Pentecostals do not support gender equality (we were ordaining women before the mainline Protestants),

Pentecostals reject the authority of the Bible and believe in receiving “new” authoritative revelations (the Bible is the final authority but God can speak through dreams, visions, prophecy, and intuition),

Pentecostals believe that you can only be saved if you speak in tongues (not true),

Pentecostals are just looking for a good “experience” (wrong on many levels).

I could go on, but don’t want to bore you :D.
 
“Lutherans believe in consubstantiation.”

“Faith alone means there’s no need to do good works.”

“Sola scriptura means a complete rejection of Tradition.”

“Luther removed books from the Bible.”

“Lutherans are too Catholic.” (In some ways we’re not Catholic enough.)

Jon

Jon
You should add that Lutherans worship the Book of Concord. ( Not enough Lutherans know enough about it. Some think that it is just for pastors or theologians ).
 
“Why are you Ukrainian Catholic, you’re not Ukrainian” (Yeah, well you’re not Roman either)
“Have you become Protestant?”
“Are you not Catholic anymore?”
“Ukrainian? If you want a Liturgy in a different language, there’s the Latin Mass in that church over there.” (Um, the Divine Liturgy I attend is in English.)
“You’re not as Catholic as I am”
“You’re Roman Catholics but just using the Liturgy of the Orthodox”
 
Oh boy, where to begin . . .

Unitarian Universalists can believe anything they want.

UUs are lapsed Christians.

UUs don’t believe in anything.

UUs are heretics. (This is usually alleged by Christians because many of us were brought up Christian. Actually, those who were reared as Christians would more accurately be called apostates, not heretics.)

There are others, but I also don’t want to bore you.

Peace,

Seeker
 
Are you saying that’s a misconception?
Yup. It’s sadly often printed without them these days, but you could also print a Catholic Bible without them, were you so inclined. (And had copyright permission…)

Either translation would still be complete, just sold in an abridged version.
 
Yup. It’s sadly often printed without them these days, but you could also print a Catholic Bible without them, were you so inclined. (And had copyright permission…)

Either translation would still be complete, just sold in an abridged version.
MY 1611 KJV contains the deuterocanon. They’re just in a different location, right before the New Testament.
 
Yup. It’s sadly often printed without them these days, but you could also print a Catholic Bible without them, were you so inclined. (And had copyright permission…)

Either translation would still be complete, just sold in an abridged version.
Wouldn’t that make it a (for lack of a better description) Protestant translation?
 
“Why are you Ukrainian Catholic, you’re not Ukrainian” (Yeah, well you’re not Roman either)
“Have you become Protestant?”
“Are you not Catholic anymore?”
“Ukrainian? If you want a Liturgy in a different language, there’s the Latin Mass in that church over there.” (Um, the Divine Liturgy I attend is in English.)
“You’re not as Catholic as I am”
“You’re Roman Catholics but just using the Liturgy of the Orthodox”
Never even knew of your existence until almost 5 years ago on my journey of hoping to become Orthodox Christian. Along the journey, I ticked off a few priests because of my ignorance that led me to learning more, sincerely came to love the Eastern traditions. However, my wife decided to be RC. I was raised in the Latin rite. However, the hometown where my family come from had rival Orthodox from what I understand. I’m still doing research on it.

Things that burn me up are:

“Catholics worship statues”
“Mary is the fourth God head”
“Catholics pray to dead people and angels” [meaning we worship them]
“most all priests are homosexual”
“why be a priest when you can be a married deacon”
“Catholics don’t know the bible”
“Catholics aren’t Christian” duh, how dumb can you be?
“The Pope is rich” or other similar comments dealing with wealth.
“Why don’t they sell all of that stuff and give it to the poor?” [never mind the fact that many of the items they want sold are historically priceless and tie the church to ancient Christianity]
Many others… and these are just the ones from my own family.😊
 
Wouldn’t that make it a (for lack of a better description) Protestant translation?
Um, no. If Catholic translators translated it, it would still be a Catholic translation. Sometimes books of the Bible are published all alone, that doesn’t make it a different translation.
 
“Why are you Ukrainian Catholic, you’re not Ukrainian” (Yeah, well you’re not Roman either)
Ha, a good one. 🙂

I hear it a lot on these forums, but there (badly) needs to be more contact between the Latin and Eastern Rites.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top