Most Beautiful Mass I've Ever Attended

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orleans_Attny
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

Orleans_Attny

Guest
This last Sunday I attended the 10:30 Solemn Sung Mass in St. Marys in Sydney. It was so beautiful it could make one’s heart ache.

For my Australian friends in Sydney, you are so very, very lucky. To my friends everywhere else: Should you visit Sydney, arrange your entire trip around this Mass - it’s so very worth it.

Pax,
OA
 
I fell guilty of being unaware of this Mass.

Is it a regular occurence?
 
This last Sunday I attended the 10:30 Solemn Sung Mass in St. Marys in Sydney. It was so beautiful it could make one’s heart ache.

For my Australian friends in Sydney, you are so very, very lucky. To my friends everywhere else: Should you visit Sydney, arrange your entire trip around this Mass - it’s so very worth it.

Pax,
OA
The most beautiful mass I have ever attended was in Russia. It was celebrated by the Patriarch of Moscow at the Trinity Lavra. Much grander and more beautiful then any papal masses I have attended. Simpley breathtaking! 😃
 
The most beautiful mass I have ever attended was in Russia. It was celebrated by the Patriarch of Moscow at the Trinity Lavra. Much grander and more beautiful then any papal masses I have attended. Simpley breathtaking! 😃
I would say that’s a matter of opinion. My preference would be the reverse, in fact.
 
This last Sunday I attended the 10:30 Solemn Sung Mass in St. Marys in Sydney. It was so beautiful it could make one’s heart ache.

For my Australian friends in Sydney, you are so very, very lucky. To my friends everywhere else: Should you visit Sydney, arrange your entire trip around this Mass - it’s so very worth it.

Pax,
OA
was it a Tridentine Latin Mass?
 
The most beautiful mass I have ever attended was in Russia. It was celebrated by the Patriarch of Moscow at the Trinity Lavra. Much grander and more beautiful then any papal masses I have attended. Simpley breathtaking! 😃
“Mass” or Divine Liturgy? The Patriarch of Moscow doesn’t celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
 
“Mass” or Divine Liturgy? The Patriarch of Moscow doesn’t celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
Get real! Wake up! The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Divine Liturgy are one and the same sacrifice!

Wow! I have seen quite a bit of ignorance on CAF but this takes the cake! :mad:
 
The most beautiful mass I have ever attended was in Russia. It was celebrated by the Patriarch of Moscow at the Trinity Lavra. Much grander and more beautiful then any papal masses I have attended. Simpley breathtaking! 😃
You are truly blessed.🙂

Joe Miranda
 
“Mass” or Divine Liturgy? The Patriarch of Moscow doesn’t celebrate the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
The Mass and Divine Liturgy are both the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, different terminology is all, but there is no difference between them.
 
The Mass and Divine Liturgy are both the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, different terminology is all, but there is no difference between them.
Nope. You are wrong.

They are both the representation of the offering of Jesus Christ to His Father for our sins. Both are NOT however “the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.” That’s just false. Liturgically there are HUGE, HUGE differences between them. In the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom, the Epiclesis comes after the Eucharistic Prayer (Anamnesis.) That alone could be VERY confusing to anyone who suggests the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

It’s would be quite correct to say that both the Eastern Divine Liturgies (including the Maronite Holy Quarbona and others) and the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass are all Catholic Sacrificial Liturgies. To suggest the Divine Liturgy is the Mass (or the reverese) however is simply wrong.
 
Nope. You are wrong.

They are both the representation of the offering of Jesus Christ to His Father for our sins. Both are NOT however “the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.” That’s just false. Liturgically there are HUGE, HUGE differences between them. In the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom, the Epiclesis comes after the Eucharistic Prayer (Anamnesis.) That along could be VERY confusing to anyone who suggests the Divine Liturgy of Saint John Chrysostom is the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
The Divine Liturgy and Mass are synonymous! They are both the representation of Christs Sacrifice! Just because the Anaphora and Canons are different docent make them different.
 
The Divine Liturgy and Mass are synonymous! They are both the representation of Christs Sacrifice! Just because the Anaphora and Canons are different docent make them different.
The Divine Liturgies (there are more than one) are not the Mass. You are wrong.

They are both Catholic Sacrificial Liturgies but the Divine Liturgies are NOT the Mass.

“The Mass” defines some very specific Catholic Sacrificial Liturgies. “The Divine Liturgy” defines some other very specific Catholic Sacrificial Liturgies.
 
The Divine Liturgies (there are more than one) are not the Mass. You are wrong.

They are both Catholic Sacrificial Liturgies but the Divine Liturgies are NOT the Mass.
Hey Toro…the Mass and Divine Liturgy are the same…even if they don’t look the same…they have all the same parts and they both produce the same thing…Christ in the Holy Eucharist…they are one and the same!
 
the Mass and Divine Liturgy are the same…even if they don’t look the same…they have all the same parts and they both produce the same thing…Christ in the Holy Eucharist…they are one and the same!
The Divine Liturgy is not “the Mass.” No way around that truth.
 
The Holy and Divine Liturgy, because the Church’s whole liturgy finds its center and most intense expression in the celebration of this sacrament; in the same sense we also call its celebration the Sacred Mysteries. We speak of the Most Blessed Sacrament because it is the Sacrament of sacraments. The Eucharistic species reserved in the tabernacle are designated by this same name.
1332 Holy Mass (Missa), because the liturgy in which the mystery of salvation is accomplished concludes with the sending forth (missio) of the faithful, so that they may fulfill God’s will in their daily lives.
It is one and the same thing but expresses different aspects of it.

This thread is now closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top