Most despicable characters in books you've read

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocklobster
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey FSC, did you begin to despise Richard more as the series progressed? I think book 6 is where things became unreadable. There is only so much I can’t take of evil chickens, killing innocent protesters and kicking in the jaws of 8-year old girls.
Meh, I despised him more because he was obviously a mouthpiece for Terry Goodkind, spouting off with his political and social ideals… I like characters to have a life of their own, not just be a front, a doppleganger, for the author. So I suppose I began to dislike him at around book 4. I havent even read the last 2 in the series I dont think.

FSC
 
It’s nice to see there is another death chooser on this forum. 😉 Unfortunately I can’t help but want to know the end of a story…no matter how terrible it is and how much I despise the characters; call me a sadist. So I read the last three books and that’s precious time in my life that I will never get back. The rants get longer, Richard becomes more unbearable, and the ending has to be the biggest deus ex machina I’ve read in any book.

Have you read his interviews? I can’t believe this guy is a New York Times best seller! :confused: For the people who haven’t heard of Terry Goodkind (aka the Yearded One), here is an interview that he did…

terrygoodkind.nl/interviews%2Bquotes/chat1.htm

I’d also like to add Terry Goodkind to the list of most despicable villains.
 
Hey FSC, did you begin to despise Richard more as the series progressed? I think book 6 is where things became unreadable. There is only so much I can’t take of evil chickens, killing innocent protesters and kicking in the jaws of 8-year old girls.

Edward IV didn’t know that he was illegitimate; this is evidence that Richard kept to himself and has only been uncovered in the last decade. As for his marriage to Elizabeth Woodville, although I agree that it was recognised by common law, it was also recognisd through power and influence. Edward had ended decades of Civil War and had amassed a lot of wealth in doing so. There were serious objectors to his marriage such as Warwick the Kingmaker and Edward’s brother, George, Duke of Clarence; as they went to war with him about it. In the end, he won though and the matter was generally settled. But when Edward IV died, this shell of power that by extension recognised his son as heir-apparent, withered, and there were many others that could make stronger claims to the throne; pretty much anyone of Lancastrian heritage, i.e. Buckingham. Although we can only speculate on Richard’s motivations, he did what he thought was necessary to prevent another Civil War in England.
All right.
 
Marquise de Merteuil and the Vicomte de Valmont - Dangerous Liasons

MadameButterfly
 
And what about Napoleon and Squealor in the Orwell’s allegory, Animal Farm?
 
MadameButterfly
Madame Butterfly is hardly despicable - she genuinely falls in love with and marries a man who she thinks loved her in turn. She doesn’t know he was already married or anything.

He, Pinkerton, of course is utterly despicable. He refuses even to see her face to face to tell her that he was already married, and that he and his wife were planning to take her (and his) child to America with them, and makes another do so.

True, she commits suicide in the end, but she is only sixteen or seventeen, and her child and (so she thought) husband were going to be taken from her forever. Such situations have driven many an older and wiser person out of their right mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top