G
GratefulDad
Guest
For those of us who have heard about Twitter, but never taken the time bother with it, this may be why. Maybe we reached a social networking and/or technology saturation point.
[switched.com/2009/05/25/most-folks-quit-twitter-after-one-month-why?icid=sphere_blogsmith_(name removed by moderator)age_switched](http://www.switched.com/2009/05/25/...er-after-one-month-why?icid=sphere_blogsmith_(name removed by moderator)age_switched)
"As we wrote last week, most Twitter users quit after the first month. While 70-percent of Facebook and MySpace members are still using the services a month after signing up, only 40 percent stick around at Twitter. The question is why?
For a service that enjoys considerable popularity amongst celebrities and the tech-elite, itās shocking that Twitter canāt seem to hold on to customers. Adam Sternbergh of New York Magazine suggests that maybe Twitter just isnāt meant for the general public. Sternbergh wonders, āJust what is [Twitter] good for?ā
Hereās an intriguing answer courtesy of a NY Magazine commenter: Twitter is perfect for āinvolving your brand in relevant conversations.ā Your brand? As a writer, politician, celebrity, etc. your name is your brand. And, as Sternbergh notes, these are exactly the types of people who, āthink that their every stray thought is publishable poetry.ā
He may be on to something, but we think itās too soon to tell. What do you think? Is Twitter less a social networking tool and more a marketing tool for the self-absorbed? [From: NYMag.com]"
[switched.com/2009/05/25/most-folks-quit-twitter-after-one-month-why?icid=sphere_blogsmith_(name removed by moderator)age_switched](http://www.switched.com/2009/05/25/...er-after-one-month-why?icid=sphere_blogsmith_(name removed by moderator)age_switched)
"As we wrote last week, most Twitter users quit after the first month. While 70-percent of Facebook and MySpace members are still using the services a month after signing up, only 40 percent stick around at Twitter. The question is why?
For a service that enjoys considerable popularity amongst celebrities and the tech-elite, itās shocking that Twitter canāt seem to hold on to customers. Adam Sternbergh of New York Magazine suggests that maybe Twitter just isnāt meant for the general public. Sternbergh wonders, āJust what is [Twitter] good for?ā
Hereās an intriguing answer courtesy of a NY Magazine commenter: Twitter is perfect for āinvolving your brand in relevant conversations.ā Your brand? As a writer, politician, celebrity, etc. your name is your brand. And, as Sternbergh notes, these are exactly the types of people who, āthink that their every stray thought is publishable poetry.ā
He may be on to something, but we think itās too soon to tell. What do you think? Is Twitter less a social networking tool and more a marketing tool for the self-absorbed? [From: NYMag.com]"