I believe it is or at least should be possible as long as people keep their faith personal and don’t try to convert you. Whenever you go to a Muslim country even as close to France as Morroco or Tunisia or Mauritania people especially women follow their rules especially when it comes to religion. You have to wear a scarf depending on where you go, hide any cross, not to show any Bible basically any other religion than Islam. Well it should be the same way round when they come to France. Which doesn’t make them racist but just strong believers in their faith. So why can’t we?
You ask an interesting question.
Tunisia, Morocco and Mauretania all have an official state religion, and as you might guess, it is Islam. In contrast, France and the United States do not have official religions.
But perhaps more important, our two governments were founded on the principles of liberal democracy. The shape of these governments grew out of the principles of liberal democracy which guide our cultures. These principles, I think, are what make pluralism possible, on many matters but especially with regard to religion.
Yet… despite our governments being secular, I wonder if there isn’t a sense in France that the country is Christian? Would the same objections to new mosque construction or religious customs (clothing, food, etc) be raised if churches were being built or distinctively Christian clothing were increasingly visible? Or is there an objection to any religion, even Christian?
Is there a limit to pluralism? If our countries were majority Christian, at least in the past, is this part of our national identity? Is it possible that pluralism can be tolerated only if the majority remains the same?
The separation between Church and State is really strong here. People just see religion as something old with no meaning in today’s life. ( its a different story if you touch All Saints holidays, Christmas Holidays, Easter holidays …).
Yes, it seems people what to hang onto the cultural elements of Christianity, without embracing Christianity. Isn’t that interesting? I have to wonder if the loss of such things, whether to secularism or to the dominance of another religion, says something about national culture or about human nature more broadly?