Actually, I hope and pray that Vatican II is the Holy Spirit’s grande finale, returning HIs Church to unity.The RCC with all its faults is much improved since Luther. Perhaps Luther succeeded after all.
Vatican ll may be Luthers grande finale.
Jon
Actually, I hope and pray that Vatican II is the Holy Spirit’s grande finale, returning HIs Church to unity.The RCC with all its faults is much improved since Luther. Perhaps Luther succeeded after all.
Vatican ll may be Luthers grande finale.
Jon unity is in Christ not in RomeActually, I hope and pray that Vatican II is the Holy Spirit’s grande finale, returning HIs Church to unity.
Jon
Neither does age, nor history, determine truth.The Holy Spirit is leading and guiding the Catholic church, since we are the oldest Christian church around…history doesn’t lie…
Agreed, but while Christ is in Wittenburg, He also in Rome.Jon unity is in Christ not in Rome
When Jesus toldNeither does age, nor history, determine truth.![]()
Moses may have been taught by his mother, but God also reveals Himself to Moses besides that. God Called Samuel even at a young age. and an audible voice is not the only way God communicates and has never been. Audible is not necessarily “Better” God spoke Audibly to me once… It was not better. I was ashamed I had not listened properly before that!He can, but name one instance in Scripture other than Abraham where He did. (Moses was taught about God by his mother.) God normally reveals Himself to us through other people.
Or even every Cafeteria Catholic. The fact that lots of people disobey and deceive (either themselves or others) does not mean the Holy Spirit is without power to teach properly.And there can’t possibly be so many exceptions to the rule as to account for every Protestant religion on earth, each with its own “Holy Spirit” telling them all manner of contradictory things.
I’ve never brought the Crusades up as a way to attack Catholics. The Crusaders did commit atrocities when they took Jerusalem, and that is inexcusable, but I am well aware as to why they were called. They were the right thing at the right time, but some men did horrible things in the course of them. Read what I wrote in its context and you might see my point.First of all, Luther absolutely failed to “reform” the Catholic church. If Luther was doing God’s work, he wouldn’t of failed, after all, God doesn’t fail.
Second you bring up the Crusades “again” and let me explain to you . The Muslims were invading the Byzatines and the Emperor called the Roman Pontiff for some back up help. The pope then sent the Christians to defend the Byzantines. Thank God for the Crusades.
And your point is? Maybe it’s cited cause it happens to be true, but I would not expect you to even come close to agreeing with that.And yet, this line is almost universally recited by all Protestants everywhere, regardless of their denomination.
Which definition of sect does the OP intend?
Jesus gave the promise to Peter, so it stands to reason that Peter’s successor inherits the promise. Peter’s successor is Pope Benedict XVI, so, that would be the Catholic Church.And they say you are. Who is the HS leading?
Jon
Which definition of sect does the OP intend?