B
Bean61
Guest
Bean61;3613714:
Hi Abbadon,
I see higher education still doesn’t teach humility.
Let’s see: how did an M1 virus go to an M5 virus. Then this virus went from a bird and eventually into a human.
How about this for an answer: It was manufactered to do just this sort of thing. I find it very difficult to believe that a new strain of virus is endangering the whole human race. It sounds fake to me, just like everything associated with Darwin and his friends.
Now by fake, I don’t mean that the bird virus doesn’t exist. I mean that it was produced by men. /QUOTE]
So the flu is a mutation of some virus that came before it. So What? I hardly think a flu virus is going to prove Darwins theories correct.Bird flu was just an example, you missed the point entirely. How about the flu? Thats not “deadly” and it also mutates every year you get a new flu shot. Do you know what a genetic mutation is?
By the way, every year that I took a flu shot I came down with a very bad flu. I don’t take flu shots anymore and I stay healty all year long. When that bird flu comes, I won’t be taking that either. You take it and let me know what happens.
I wasn’t there for either one. Neither were you.Have you heard of small pox? What do you think the black plague was?
What animals are you discussing here? God didn’t necessarily make all the animals at the same split second. Are you aware that at approximately 350 million years ago scientists found that the earth was covered with animals. They found their bones. All over the place. All kinds of bones. Now when these same scientists go back to 375 million years ago there are no bones. Where did these animals come form? There were no ancestors of the animals in which the bones were found. Almost like they just showed up. Mmmmmm. What can this mean?Well where did these animals come from? How come we find them at certain periods of time but not at others? Why are there no bunny rabbits during the cretaceous?
They couldn’t have evolved. There were no ancestors. Wow! Now this is a mystery. Of course Darwinians just ignore it, as they should ignore it. Why? Because it may put them out of business.
I meant to say Darwinism. This is also known as the religion of evolution and natural selection with Darwin as the founder and Dawkins as the high priest.Darwanism, I hear this thrown around alot you make it sound like a religion. Since darwin first proposed the theory there have been some great new discoveries and refinements to the theory. Do you mean Evolution? Well what i was trying to indicate by the age of the earth and the age of the universe is that we have vastly enough time for the theory to function. If the universe was say 10 000 years old there would be no way evolution is even a considered theory.
Please, we don’t have 10,000 years to prove that the founder was correct. I say we go on to bigger and better things than Darwinism.
I never said that science works on smoke and mirrors. We do have a lot of really good scientists, unfortunately none of them are Darwinians. Your statement implies that Darwinians made the above discoveries. My own opinion is that Darwinians prayed at the alter of Dawkins while the real scientists went to work.I’m sorry but science doesnt work on smoke and mirrors. How else could science and scientific advancement send man to the moon. Cure diseases, provide clean water through filtration. Feed millions on Hubes priciple to increase yield. on average increase life expectancy by 30 - 50 years. International communication at your fingertips, worldwide travel capabilities.
Darwinians haven’t got a clue as to what the “scientific method” is. If they did, their work doesn’t show it!IF science worked on smoke and mirrors then we would not have any of these things. I trust the scientific method BECAUSE it has made my world a better place. And i understand it. I’m not an evolutionary biologist, and i dont know if an evolutionary biologist would spend his time on these boards. But i do know the roughs of evolution or can find them out. Instead of me asking you questions how about you tell me why do you think evolution is smoke and mirrors?
I’m moving from a design degree into a science degree and beginning next semester will mainly be doing human biology. So hopefully in the next few months I will be more equiped to answer such questions at a higher level.
Sorry, there is a huge scientific debate as to the validity of Darwinism.But I can tell you right now that there is no debate in the scientific community about the validity of evolution. And at the end of the day when it comes to questions OF science, the global science community’s opinion of the time is the only thing that counts.
Global Science Community: What praytell is this?
Are these the people that mix the poisonous cocktails for the women in the Philipines? In my humble opinion I would say that the Global science community is failing badly in doing their duty.
Please do.Evolution isn’t that important (beside the basic principles) to my future studies, but just because of the amount of bashing it seems to not only get but give, the theistic view point may mean i have to go deep into it.
Besides that, I know several people who work at LLNL who believe in ID and have trouble with Darwinism.
We’re not turning in term papers. We’re having a discussion. I know plenty of quick typers who are quite well educated and intelligent. Lighten up! 