T
TheLizardKing
Guest
All I know is…
Leo needs to stop making movies that make me wonder whether or not I exist lol!
Leo needs to stop making movies that make me wonder whether or not I exist lol!
Yeah, I didn’t think so. Geremia was just trolling.Contrary to the plot of the movie, you’re claiming the human shaped “projections” of a character’s subconscious are actually people. Can you give any rationale for that claim?
I heard that you hear the top fall after the blackout (but before the credits). I’m going to see it again, too, and I’ll also check on these things.Hmm, maybe. I heard it second hand from someone. I’ve been trying to check online, but I can’t seem to get anything conclusive. There’s a second rumour that at the end of the credits you hear the top fall, but obviously we can’t confirm that. I’ll have to see it again, which I was planning to do because the movie is so good.
Yes, excellent point. I think it’s pretty clear he’s in reality, especially in light of the fact that - as another poster pointed out - the kids are older; they were played by different child actors at the end.Although something conclusive I have heard that makes a lot more sense is that at the end, Leo is not wearing a wedding ring. Apparently (again, I can’t confirm from here) he always wears a wedding ring in “dreamland” and never in the real world.
Exactly. He already rejected the possibility of living in a solipsistic illusion.It just doesn’t fit with the rest of the story either. If he was in “dreamland”, then he has the ability to shape his world, but the scene before he lets go of the memory of his long dead wife and she is completely absent at the end. It’s a bit contradictory to say that he accepts the reality that is wife is dead, but still chooses to live in a fantasy. Like, if you’re going to live in a fantasy world, why not go all the way?
Precisely.The only way you really could argue it is if you say that the whole thing is a dream. Which would require ignoring the fact that it doesn’t follow the established rules of dreaming. Unless you want to argue that the rules are different, but at that point you’ve pretty much usurped the entire movie as it is (and that is best left to badly written fan fiction).
I hope so. If he were serious, my faith in humanity would have been shaken.Yeah, I didn’t think so. Geremia was just trolling.
Marketing ploy. Most people don’t hear it (if it’s there), and go on to talk about it with each other, their friends, then to their friends, ect. Never underestimate the power of word of mouth marketing, it’s the best kind. People market the movie themselves, turning it into sort of an “event” (for example, I don’t remember seeing a lot of Avatar ads, but by the time it came out I really wanted to see it just from what I’d heard about it. It had become a major event).I suspect it won’t be there, though. I mean, why would the movie have that blackout before the top falls, if it was just going to show us definitively that it falls anyway?
Movie= Amazing.I’m thinking of watching the movie Inception. I have heard high praise for it from critics and friends alike. Has anyone seen this?
How was it as a movie? How was it in terms of morality/Church teachings?
Thanks for your (name removed by moderator)ut! God Bless![]()
The film contains much action violence, some of it bloody, several uses of profanity and a few crude and crass terms. The Catholic News Service classification is A-III – adults. The Motion Picture Association of America rating is PG-13 – parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
Movies have been evaluated by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishop’s Office for Film and Broadcasting according to artistic merit and moral suitability. The reviews include the USCCB rating, the Motion Picture Association of America rating, and a brief synopsis of the movie.
The classifications are as follows:
** Discontinued classification. All archived movies that were originally in the A-IV category are now classified as L.Code:* A-I -- general patronage; * A-II -- adults and adolescents; * A-III -- adults; * A-IV** * L -- limited adult audience, films whose problematic content many adults would find troubling. L replaces the previous classification, A-IV. * O -- morally offensive.
Spoiler- KindaI don’t know what movie you were watching! It was SO much more complex than ESotSM (and I really like that movie). Did you not realize HIGHLIGHT FOR SPOILER: that the whole movie was about Cobb trying to perform inception on himself? to make himself believe that the final scene with his children was real? because that’s what I got from it. all of the characters and everything that happened were projections. why else would the kids be the same age/wearing the same clothes as his last memory of them? AWESOME MOVIE!
Reversing that, I did not see any overt anti-Catholicism, so it’s not anti-Catholic. So, by the same line of reasoning, it MUST be Catholic!If it’s not Catholic, it’s anti-Catholic.[BIBLEDRB]Matthew 12:30[/BIBLEDRB]
There are multiple mechanisms by which the brain can be brought out of a state of sleep- it was stated that the majority were disabled by the sedative that was being used, whilst inner ear function (that which we experience during a fall) was left unimpaired.Thank you. :clapping:
This always happens whenever one good (not excellent and outstanding, but merely good) movie shows up alongside the terribly and trashy ones: people go out of their way to praise and over-hype it. It was absurd, and you’re right: How can someone be woken up with a “kick,” but not by a car chase or gunfire? Um…hello? Wouldn’t the latter be a wee bit more threatening to the psyche than a nudge?
Interesting question, Christine. My 23 year old nephew insisted I come along with him to see it. His second time, my first. It didn’t do a whole lot for me. I loved the special effects and" got" the entire movie but wasn’t blown away by it. Btw, my 18 year old nephew came along too and he loved it. I must be an old fogey!I really liked it. I was riveted to my seat the whole movie. I loved the dream within a dream within a dream structure. And the idea of an architect of dreams who designs the settings. Awesome special effects. It makes you really think about how strange dreams are. When I came out of the theatre I kind of felt like I was coming out of a dream.
I read an article that said most older people do not like the movie, but most younger people do. I am an older person, so I guess I’m not the norm. I wonder if this is true? How many here over 40 did not like the movie or did not “get” the movie, and vice versa?
Over 40 here and I enjoyed it, definitely ‘got’ it and appreciated the acting, the choreography, the cinematography.I really liked it. I was riveted to my seat the whole movie. I loved the dream within a dream within a dream structure. And the idea of an architect of dreams who designs the settings. Awesome special effects. It makes you really think about how strange dreams are. When I came out of the theatre I kind of felt like I was coming out of a dream.
I read an article that said most older people do not like the movie, but most younger people do. I am an older person, so I guess I’m not the norm. I wonder if this is true? How many here over 40 did not like the movie or did not “get” the movie, and vice versa?