F
Fran65
Guest
That’s true.if they understand the very premise, to discuss the theological inaccuracies found in it.
That’s true.if they understand the very premise, to discuss the theological inaccuracies found in it.
Well I’ll certainly be avoiding 2012 due to the strong statements against faith in God Roland makes (vield with the typical “I don’t like organized religion” remarks). However I do think it is only fair to correct a mischarictarization in this post. These are Rolands words regarding Islamic icons:I won’t support anything that undermines the essential values and beliefs of my faith. A previous post noted that this is not the first in a long line of films that have come out of Hollywood taking liberal aim at the essential concepts and beliefs of our faith, and I have to say that I haven’t nor will see any of those either.
I find it insulting that Hollywood feels so free to b@stardize my faith with little regard to how insulting or blastphemous it is to Christians.
They have absolutely no respect for our Most Holy and Sacred beliefs.
Although, they won’t touch other faith’s very much if at all. Especially, Muslim beliefs, ideas, or sacred icons (I’m thinking of the movie 2012 here where the director relished destroying Christian icons of faith but explicitly stated he wouldn’t dare touch Muslim icons.)
I am all about a good fiction story but I will not support any media that makes a mockary of my faith with it’s distortion of Divine Revelation.
So apparently the director him self was all about it, but was convinced not to due to the fear of possible assasination. Regardless, I think it’s still well worth missing 2012 and future Emmerich films, at least certainly for me.Well, I wanted to do that, I have to admit," Emmerich says. "But my co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right. … We have to all … in the Western world … think about this. You can actually … let … Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have … a fatwa, and that sounds a little bit like what the state of this world is. So it’s just something which I kind of didn’t [think] was [an] important element, anyway, in the film, so I kind of left it out
yes. they sure helped those poor people in haiti didn’t they?how could angels come here to destroy humans, i mean they’re the one’s protecting us from harm.
After all that I’ve seen and read, I don’t think I could sit through this movie without wishing that I could erase it from my memory. I’m highly disappointed that St. Michael would be portrayed as a fallen angel. I have wanted to see a high budget Hollywood movie starring St. Michael for a long time. Furthermore, I was hoping it would be about St. Michael leading the angels into battle on God’s behalf against satan and later relegating him to hell. Leave it to Hollywood to rewrite Revelations.Unfortunately, this movie is dangerous, since some may take this movie as prophecy.
Catholic Answers actually talked to one of the producers of that film. Doug Urbanski on 1/8/10. He runs a production company along with Gary Oldman, he helped produce Book of Eli and he’s a strong Catholic.Stupid movie, i saw book of Eli, now that is a reasonable movie.