E
ElizabethPH
Guest
I didn’t see it and won’t. I probably couldn’t sit through. Nothing makes me squirm more then someone like Ma hers attitudes against Christianity especially Catholicism.
One ought not to have to take Mahan seriously since he is the archetypical professional scoffer, He makes a living at this stuff, a kind of malicious clown.Father Barron on Bill Maher’s “Religulous”
creativeminorityreport.com/2008/10/fr-barron-on-religulous.html
You want to be a bigot one day?I just got back from the movies. I saw that comedy/documentary “Religulous” with Bill Maher…
My God, that was a great movie! It’s a great movie that really makes you think and question yourself about society and humanity and its relationship with religion–general Christianity, mostly.
I highly recommend this movie for a bit of laughs and insights… but I have to admit, it sounds very much like a rant in some points. Either way, I’d seriously want to debate just like Bill Maher one day. It’s gonna take a lot of research.
Ironically Yours, Blade and Blood
i agree with what Deacon Ed B said above.One ought not to have to take Mahan seriously since he is the archetypical professional scoffer, He makes a living at this stuff, a kind of malicious clown.
I agree with you!I watched it a while back and liked it. All his questions were valid and logical, nothing wrong with asking them. And don’t get me started on his sense of humor, I laughed all the way through it.
I will say if someone doesn’t have super strong faith they shouldn’t watch it. It can easily make you question everything you thought you believed in.
I’m sorry but I think it is absolutely HILARIOUS that you believe that Reginald Foster has dementia because his views don’t line up 100% with Catholic teaching. He seemed pretty sharp to me in the interview.Just got through watching it on Netflix.
This is an entertaining documentary if it fails at all else. He interviews many people across the world, from the truck stop pew-sitter to the televangelist wearing a $2,000 suit. While it is interesting to watch people try and defend what they believe, Maher could have really attempted to cast doubt into organized religion by interviewing respected apologists like Tim Staples. Staples would be able to hold a serious, intellectual debate with Maher. But like most the interviews, it would probably be heavily edited. A few of his interviewees seemed to be picked due to their advanced age (see: Dementia), including Father Reginald Foster, a Senior Vatican Priest. Fr. Foster, in plain clothes, denounced the extravagance of The Vatican, the “old Catholic things”, “nice stories”, and Midnight Mass.
Ultimately, “Religulous” is entertainment. There is minimal serious debate about the credibility and benefit of organized religion; the majority of the time is spent with bottom-of-the-barrel believers, clips from old religious movies (circa “The Ten Commandments”), and hearing Maher laugh at his own jokes. If you are not steadfast in your faith, don’t watch it; it’s geared toward luring the unsure and giving water-cooler jokes to anyone already skeptical about organized religion.
Foster may not have Dementia, but He does NOT Hold to Catholic Teaching. A such, he is Worng. His Participation in Maher’s Film only increased His “Wrongness.”I’m sorry but I think it is absolutely HILARIOUS that you believe that Reginald Foster has dementia because his views don’t line up 100% with Catholic teaching. He seemed pretty sharp to me in the interview.
Also I like that you recommend someone struggling with their faith to not watch it because it might lure them to agnosticism or something like that. Are you going to try to shield these people forever?
Anyway, I have seen the movie a few times and think it is quite funny and Maher is reasonably convincing at pointing out the flaws in some of the beliefs of different religions.