M
MaggieOH
Guest
There is no official Church position so the whole thing is mootMaggie wrote:
Agreed. It still defines the Church’s official position on Geocentrism.
Is the Church’s official position in error?
99% of what we believe as Catholicis has never been defined infallibly by a Pope.
Maybe Geocentrism should be listed as a banned topic on this forum, since the embarrassment it causes is too great.
Can you imagine those imbecillic popes and saints and fathers and that error-ridden bible claiming geocentrism when the likes of Galileo (hallelueau, hallelueau, hallelueau) and Corpenicus (hallelueau, hallelueau, hallelueau) and Einstein {choir of angels singing, with halos and wings fluttering, etc.} have the clear opinion it is untrue? Clearly the catholic church has the wrong priorities .
Sorry to break into a spell of sarcasm. This is not directed personally at you, Maggie. As I said in the closed threads where we were discussing the issue, I found it somewhat shocking when I first came across the idea on Robert Sungenis’ website (www.catholicintl.com). I would say, have an open mind. Things in cosmology are no where near as well defined as is claimed.
Take a look at the two threads on this forum re. Geocentrism.
In Jesus,
Mark Wyatt