B
blackrobe
Guest
The use of several non-liturgical songs in the* Novus Ordo* seems almost universal these days. By what authority has this come about? The GIRM mentions only options for designated liturgical chants.
You don’t state what songs you are talking about. I have never experienced this personally. Are you saying they are playing secular songs where you attend Mass, or what?The use of several non-liturgical songs in the* Novus Ordo* seems almost universal these days. By what authority has this come about? The GIRM mentions only options for designated liturgical chants.
In fairness, they do mention that hymns may be used, as long as they capture the spirit of the antiphons listed in the IGMR/GRIM. That, of course, requires that the antiphons be at least examined before the choices of hymns be made. I doubt if this is done more than in a handful of parishes. And if you want to hear Gregorian chant, you probably need to go to a monastery for that.The use of several non-liturgical songs in the* Novus Ordo* seems almost universal these days. By what authority has this come about? The GIRM mentions only options for designated liturgical chants.
Once a month, on a rotating basis in the parishes of the Archdiocese of Sherbrooke, QC. And in the Ordinary Form too for that matter.And if you want to hear Gregorian chant, you probably need to go to a monastery for that.
Thanks for correcting my terminological* faux pas*, I blame fatigue. Anyway, I suppose I mean anything that does not meet the description of the Roman Missal:You don’t state what songs you are talking about. I have never experienced this personally. Are you saying they are playing secular songs where you attend Mass, or what?
BTW, the preferred term is the Ordinary Form of the Mass.
I am fortunate to have an oratory within 50 miles that has both an adult and children’s choir which can do the job admirably.In fairness, they do mention that hymns may be used, as long as they capture the spirit of the antiphons listed in the IGMR/GRIM. That, of course, requires that the antiphons be at least examined before the choices of hymns be made. I doubt if this is done more than in a handful of parishes. And if you want to hear Gregorian chant, you probably need to go to a monastery for that.
Actually the 4-hymn Mass became pretty much standard right after the council, as the old Mass was being dismantled. The Prayers at the Foot of the Altar and the Last Gospel were eliminated among other prayers eventually. When Pope Paul’s Mass was promulgated, although the antiphons (Introit, Communion, etc.) were still listed in Latin, they never completed the translations into the vernacular and there was no reason not to continue with the status quo, the hymns.I am fortunate to have an oratory within 50 miles that has both an adult and children’s choir which can do the job admirably.
So would you say compliance with the Roman Missal depends on what one considers sacred music? And are there any authoritative standards? Approved books?
Amen! :clapping: If you look up what was written about sacred music from the Vatican ll in the 19 60’s the bishops, at least many of them, never implemented what should have been requested by the Vatican. So goes our liturgy-- :harp:catholicculture.org/commentary/articles.cfm?id=535 andThe use of several non-liturgical songs in the* Novus Ordo* seems almost universal these days. By what authority has this come about? The GIRM mentions only options for designated liturgical chants.
So the GIRM says other music is OK. Your OP said your parish uses non-liturgical music.Other kinds of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded, provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation of all the faithful.50
The choir I’m in charge of has young people, aged 11 - 23, who sing Gregorian chant at mass every week, at an ordinary parish in an ordinary neighborhood (on the lower income side). At the very least, we chant the Sanctus and Agnus Dei in Latin, and one of us sings the Communion Antiphon (from Simple English Propers) with the Psalm every week at the beginning of communion. We still have time to sing two hymns the antiphon.In fairness, they do mention that hymns may be used, as long as they capture the spirit of the antiphons listed in the IGMR/GRIM. That, of course, requires that the antiphons be at least examined before the choices of hymns be made. I doubt if this is done more than in a handful of parishes.** And if you want to hear Gregorian chant, you probably need to go to a monastery for that.**
I’ve always found the bold text (above) to be somewhat confusing. By it’s very structure, polyphony does not foster “participation of all the faithful,” if by participation we mean that they sing along. I’m pretty sure that even if we had made copies for the congregation of the “Vidi Aquam” polyphony at Easter, not many would have a clue how to even follow along with the three independent voices as they criss-crossed over each other and then met at the end of each phrase.
- The main place should be given, all things being equal, to Gregorian chant, as being proper to
the Roman Liturgy. **Other kinds of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded,
provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation
of all the faithful.**50
Since the faithful from different countries come together ever more frequently, it is desirable that
they know how to sing together at least some parts of the Ordinary of the Mass in Latin, especially the
Profession of Faith and the Lord’s Prayer, according to the simpler settings.
For the record,. I think the majority of bishops and majority of priests disagree.
I think we’re in agreement.For the record,
My point was that there was strong recommendation to use Latin, Gregorian chant, organ, etc. Otherwise why was it brought up as the first item on the council agenda/schema? I think anyone has the right to at least ask the priest or bishop to use at Mass what was recommended at the council, no? People don’t need to be slammed down because 99% decide to go against the recommendations or suggestions or whatever was decided at the council.I said the bishops disagree that Gregorian chant is the only acceptable music used at Mass and that’s what the council fathers also said.
Apparently you know more about me than I do. I’ll be sure to check with you next time I need to know what I think. I did not propose an argument; you assumed one. I merely wanted to know by what authority it has become nearly universal to disregard the Missal and I have my answer: Because we can.So the GIRM says other music is OK. Your OP said your parish uses non-liturgical music.
I’m guessing that your parish is using “other kinds of sacred music” and you’re unhappy because you think anything that isn’t Gregorian chant isn’t appropriate for liturgy. I think the majority of bishops and majority of priests disagree.
If the hymns in the missalettes and hymnals from the big publishers are OK with the bishops and they’re not your cup of tea, you’ll have to find someplace that has the kind of music that suits you. But saying that the GIRM doesn’t allow hymns or that they’re non-liturgical isn’t an argument that’s going to win the day except with those who already agree with you.
Yes, I have been a witness to all of that but I still can’t figure out how it came about with respect to authority. It seems that* Sacrosanctum Concilium* the* Missale Romanum* have simply been disregarded. Pastoral* fiat*? * Vox populi*?Actually the 4-hymn Mass became pretty much standard right after the council, as the old Mass was being dismantled. The Prayers at the Foot of the Altar and the Last Gospel were eliminated among other prayers eventually. When Pope Paul’s Mass was promulgated, although the antiphons (Introit, Communion, etc.) were still listed in Latin, they never completed the translations into the vernacular and there was no reason not to continue with the status quo, the hymns.