Muslim-Catholic agreement hailed (Diocese of Rochester)

  • Thread starter Thread starter stumbler
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

stumbler

Guest
ROCHESTER – About 350 people gathered in Sacred Heart Cathedral the evening of May 6 to mark the second anniversary of the Muslim Catholic Agreement of Understanding and Cooperation.

Dr. Sayyid Muhammad Syeed, secretary general of the Islamic Society of North America, based in Plainfield, Ind., spoke at the event and was effusive in his praise of the agreement, which is believed to be the only one of its kind in the world.

“Rochester is the ‘Vatican’ of Catholic-Muslim dialogue,” Syeed said during an interview.

He added that his society, which has more than 300 affiliates throughout the United States and Canada, wants to promote similar agreements elsewhere.

During his presentation, Syeed noted that Catholics and Muslims have a positive shared history that is often overlooked. For example, he said that the prophet Muhammad was sheltered by his wife’s Christian cousin. He also called the late Pope John Paul II “the fulfillment of prayers for centuries,” because he renewed positive relations between the faiths.

Father Francis V. Tiso, associate director of the Secretariat for Ecumenical and Interreligious Affairs of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, also spoke at the celebration.

“For some people, diversity is no obstacle,” he said, noting that America is at its best when it respects peoples’ religious differences.

Muslim and Catholic leaders, including Bishop Matthew H. Clark, signed the agreement on May 5, 2003.

The agreement pledged the diocese and the Council of Masajid (Mosques) of Rochester to affirm rights of free speech, thought, conscience and religion; reject religious and ethnic intolerance; promote and encourage a deeper knowledge of and respect for the history, traditions and sensitivities of the two faiths; promote collaboration in providing services to those in need in the Rochester community; and implement the agreement jointly. . . .

Full article
 
Why is the Catholic Diocese of Rochester so earnest to identify themselves with the Muslim religion? What ultimately will be achieved? How necessary was the pledge and agreement considering that freedom of religion is already established in the US? The agreement appears more political than religious.
 
Unfortunately, the first thing that came to mind was the “Munich Agreement” which was intended to prevent war with Germany. I’m wary of this Catholic-Muslim “agreement”. Sorry, 9-11 can do that to you.
 
I don’t understand what will be achieved by this either.

And I wonder how the Coptic Christians of Egypt would feel about this so-called “agreement”? After they have been subject under Islam for over 1400 years, and who are about the last pocket of historic Christianity in North Africa. Not to mention the Greek Orthodox who lost Constantinople, and the great church Hagia Sophia to Turkish Muslim conquerors in the 15th century whom converted it to a mosque. byzantines.net/epiphany/hagiasophia.htm

After reading about much of this, I can understand some of the motivations and deep ethnic animosities the Serbs had in invading Bosnia and Kosovo in the 90s. Though I cannot personally condone their actions.

Much is said about the medieval Christian crusades into the middle east, and how evil and wrong they were, but you rarely ever hear about the Islamic armies that streamed out of Arabia in the 7th century. Sadly it is a tragic epoch in history that goes largely unread in our day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top