Do you have any evidence or support for this theory or is it just that - speculation?
Obviously since I am Catholic I find this completely unbelievable, but perhaps you have something historical or factual to base your story on. ???
Sorry, I didn’t follow this. What was inserted in brackets? I will have to go back and reread all the posts because I’m not following your line of thought at all.
Again, do you have any evidence that this has anything to do with Judas?
Given the context of that verse, the sentence, “Now while they were going, behold, some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened.” meaning the fact that the tomb was found to be empty.

Here is the account with Thomas:
According to this account, Thomas witnessed the nailmarks in Jesus’ hands and the wound in His side. My question is, do you believe this account as recorded in the Bible or is this one of the “corrupted” verses?

I thought I had said that Jesus confirmed that He was crucified. If not, I should have.

Here was what the disciples said to Jesus when He asked what they were speaking about and why they were sad: (Luke 24: 20-27)
And they said to him, “Concerning Jesus of Nazareth, who was a prophet, mighty in work and word before God and all the people; and how our chief priests and rulers delivered him up to be sentenced to death,
and crucified him. But we were hoping that it was he who should redeem Israel. Yes, and besides all this, today is the third day since these things came to pass. And moreover, certain women of our company, who were at the tomb before it was light, astounded us, and not finding his body, they came saying that they had also seen a vision of angels, who said that he is alive. So some of our company went to the tomb, and found it even as the women had said, but him they did not see.”
But he said to them, “O foolish ones and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken!
Did not the Christ have to suffer these things before entering into his glory?” And beginning then with Moses and with all the Prophets, he interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things referring to himself."
I’ve bolded the relevant parts. The disciples clearly state that Jesus was crucified and Jesus answers them as bolded in the second part above. He does not say He wasn’t crucified, in fact He confirms what the disciples spoke of regarding His sufferings. He also revealed to them all of the Scriptures that foretold His coming although I’m sure the confirmation of all of those is for a whole other thread.
Jesus also confirms it again to all of the apostles (Luke 24: 45-49)
Then he opened their minds, that they might understand the Scriptures. And he said to them, “Thus it is written; and thus the Christ should suffer, and should rise again from the dead on the third day; and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name to all the nations, beginning from Jerusalem. And you yourselves are witnesses of these things. And I send forth upon you the promise of my Father. But wait here in the city, until you are clothed with power from on high.”
What is the Muslim interpretation of the bolded question, not with regard to His suffering, but with regard to Jesus calling Himself “the Christ” and “before entering into his glory.”?