Muslims, I have a question for you.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poetess_Kera
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

Poetess_Kera

Guest
The commentary in my copy of the Qur’an by Abdullah Yosuf Ali claims that Mary is worshipped by Catholics. Mary is honoured, not worshipped. It also says:

“She never claimed that she was the mother of God or that her son was God.”

Elizabeth asks Mary in Luke 1:43, " ‘And why has this happened to me, that the mother of my Lord comes to me?’"

‘Lord’ is interchangeable with ‘God’. Saint Thomas, putting a finger in Jesus’ side, exclaims, “My Lord and my God!”

Surah 19:16-19 : One angel appeared to Mary
Surah 3:42 - 45: “The angels”

Surah 22:47 - “Verily a Day in the sight of thy Lord is like a thousand years of your reckoning.”
Surah 70:4 - “The angels and the Spirit ascend unto Him in a Day
The measure whereof is (as) fifty thousand years:”

Christians are said to be rewarded in Surah 5:69, but three verses later, it says we will be damned.

How long did Allah take to create the world? Six days (Qur’an 7: 54), two days (Qur’an 41: 9), four days (Qur’an 41: 10), or two days and a bit (Qur’an 41: 12)?

Could you please explain to me how you view these internal contradictions?
 
From debate.org:

According to the Qur’an, no-one bore the name of Yahya before John the Baptist (sura 19:7). Yet, we find that name mentioned in the Old Testament (2 Kings 25:23) implying that it was a well known name hundreds of years before the writing of the Qur’an.

The Qur’an completely misrepresents the doctrine of the Trinity. The author of sura 5:116 mistakenly thought that Christians worshipped three gods: the Father, the Mother (Mary), and the Son (Jesus). But Christians don’t worship this doctrine of the Trinity at all! There was a heretical sect of Christianity called the Choloridians, who had a concept of the Trinity which included Mary, who would have been in Arabia during the time of Muhammad. They are possibly the source for this obvious error.

Another error is also found in sura 5:73-75, where the Qur’an says, “They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three…” Obviously the accusation is against Christians, yet Christians do not believe God is one of three! We believe that God is one. Yusuf Ali does a grave injustice in his translation by adding the phrase, “Allah is one of three in a trinity.” The words “in a trinity” do not exist in the Arabic text! Ali puts it into his translation in an attempt to avoid the rather obvious mistake that Christians believe in three gods.

Sura 65:12 reads, “It is God who hath created seven heavens and as many earths.” We would love to know where the other six earths are. If these refer to the planets in our solar system, then they are short by two (and now possibly three).

The Qur’an says that the calf worshipped by the Israelites at mount Horeb was molded by a Samaritan (sura 20:85-87, 95-97). Yet the term ‘Samaritan’ was not coined until 722 B.C., which is several hundred years after the events recorded in Exodus. Thus, the Samaritan people could not have existed during the life of Moses, and therefore, could not have been responsible for molding the calf.

The name for Jesus in the Qur’an is given as “Issa.” Yet this is incorrect. Issa is the Arabic equivalent of Esau, the name for the twin brother of Jacob. The correct Arabic name for Jesus would be Yesuwa, similar to the Hebrew Yeshuwa, yet the supposedly “all-knowing” Qur’an has no mention of it.

In sura 18:86 it states, “Until, when he reached the setting of the sun, he found it set in a spring of murky water: Near it he found a people: We said: O Dhu al Qarnayn! Either punish them,or treat them with kindness.” It is well known that only the superstitious in the age of Muhammad believed that the sun would set in a muddy spring.

Suras 16:15; 21:31; 31:10; 78:6-7; 88:19 tell us that God placed (threw down) mountains on the earth like tent pegs to keep the earth from shaking. For pre-scientific man this would sound logical, since mountains are large and therefore, their weight would have seemingly, a stabilizing effect on the earth. Yet we now know this logic to be quite inaccurate. Mountains do not render the earth’s crust stable. In fact, the very existence of mountains is evidence of instability in the earth’s crust, as they are found and pushed up by the colliding of tectonic plates (i.e. the migration of Arabia toward Iran has resulted in the Zagros range, France pushing against Italy produced the Alps, and the Indian plate nudging Tibet has given us the Himalayas).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top