R
RomanCrusader
Guest
I actually tried that. He claimed that didn’t countActs 8:27-39 would also seem to be relevant, Philip baptising the Ethiopian eunuch.
rossum
I actually tried that. He claimed that didn’t countActs 8:27-39 would also seem to be relevant, Philip baptising the Ethiopian eunuch.
rossum
Really? I would ask him what criterea he uses to determine which parts of the Bible count and which don’t. Then I would ask him how he determined that criterea (in other words, where scripture–the word of God–upholds his idea).I actually tried that. He claimed that didn’t count![]()
I found it funny because I’m a Pat Buchanan style traditional conservative and he still was freaking out at me. He said the only important political issue was race and that only liberals were against racism. Therefore I was automatically “liberal” in his eyes.Really? I would ask him what criterea he uses to determine which parts of the Bible count and which don’t. Then I would ask him how he determined that criterea (in other words, where scripture–the word of God–upholds his idea).
Oh, and also ask where he got the authority to decide which parts of the Bible count. While you’re at it, be sure to point out that since he gets this authority, it’s only fair other Christians get it too–which of course would result in all of us individualizing our Bibles, deleting and adding whatever we want.
So, by his line of thinking, it would be okay for some Christians to eliminate the Ten Commandments. It would be okay to get rid of all that “Love your neighbor” business.
I’ve heard of Cafeteria Catholics. This guy wants a “Cafeteria Bible.”