W
warpspeedpetey
Guest
i see you have gone to the dark side of the force, my young padawan.I have killed this ‘G-d’ with a mere thought, and so have many other protestants, atheists, muslims, etc.
our understanding becomes more clarified over time, that doesn’t change who G-d is, He is not contingent on us.God changes definition. There is no one definition of ‘Him’. Even the Catholic definition has changed, more-so evolved over the years.
they condemn themselves, we dont condemn them, they make the choice. yet they can be forgiven, not all is yet lost for themHere we see that all non-believers are to be condemned by the ‘one’ church:
why would you assume that?, Holiness has no expiration date, it doesnt go bad with time.That creed was indeed closer to the time of Jesus, so it would be assumed it was more Holy.
they are also not catholics, they are protestants.If the concept of God has not changed over the years then George W. Bush and Barack Obama should be condemned publicly by the One church. They certainly do not adhere to the proclamations of the Nicean creed:
what makes you think that would happen, what theory supports that?Being very public figures, their condemnation would lead them to repent, in theory.
But, no, the ‘one’ church has not publicly condemned these figures, so the ‘one’ church has indeed changed its policies.
- it has never been to my knowledge our policy to condemn POTUS for not being Catholic.
- we can change policy whenever we want, whats the big deal about that?
how have we changed our stance on G-d? we may clarify our understanding, but, to my knowledge, we have never said we were previously wrong about G-d, we now believe Him to be this or that way.The ‘one’ church has indeed changed its stance on God.
not by us, you keep confusing us with other faiths.Therefore the concept of God is subject to change.
you are confusing the concept of G-d, with the reality of G-dTherefore it is not a concrete belief.
nothing new there, any concept is subject to the one considering it, but you seem to be drawing the conclusion that G-d Himself is some how subject to you, because you can manipulate a concept of HimIt is subject to the will and power of Man.
that is an old idea of controlling someone by controlling their effigy, a ‘concept’ of them
it is called…
voodoo
doo yoo doo voodoo?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dd6/a0dd67a17ec8b6e6bcb45d7047f3d9bfe87084bb" alt="Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂"