B
bones_IV
Guest
What’s this now? Very interesting article. A must read.
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/15/AR2006121501820.html
washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/15/AR2006121501820.html
In other words, “Quit reminding me of what a *&%@$^ I am!”As relief about my own situation has come to me, I’ve talked freely and regularly about being donor-conceived, in public and in private. In the beginning, I also talked about it a lot with my biological father. After a bit, though, I noticed that his enthusiasm for our developing relationship seemed to be waning. When I told him of my suspicion, he confirmed that he was tired of “this whole sperm-donor thing.” The irony stings me more each time I think of him saying that. The very thing that brought us together was pushing us in opposite directions.
The young lady mentions her mother being on Food Stamps which made me wonder something. Way back before labs women who wanted a “fatherless” child [oxymoron alert!] would do it the old fashioned way and sign a contract with the donor guaranteeing anonymity, relieving him of child support, &c.I’ve been predicting for about 10 years that the day would soon come when the children of the artificial insemination and in vitro generation came of age and starting voicing in their own identifiable personages what we have long known. All it takes is no longer being able to put it “out of sight, out of mind”. And for people to stand in solidaity with strength of numbers. The baby boomers’ power and self centered ways won’t last forever. One day, they too will die and perhaps the children of this silly season will be able to lead forward from the mistakes made which so many young people have had to pay the price for, though they are the actual victims.
In all cases (and wherever in the world) what is really being treated by such methods has nothing to do with disease, but everything to do with desire.Maybe someone can correct me but I’ve read that the US is the only country where sperm is a commercial commodity, i.e. anyone (any woman actually) can walk in and buy it. In the EU & UK at least these labs exist only to treat infertility (yes, I know that’s bad in iteslf).
very good point. i didn’t have any clue about the laws being different in the US for Europe.The young lady mentions her mother being on Food Stamps which made me wonder something. Way back before labs women who wanted a “fatherless” child [oxymoron alert!] would do it the old fashioned way and sign a contract with the donor guaranteeing anonymity, relieving him of child support, &c.
These contracts were found invalid because the right to child support belongs to the child and can’t be signed away by the mother. Why has this principle disappeared simply because a lab now stands between the mother and the “donor”?
Maybe someone can correct me but I’ve read that the US is the only country where sperm is a commercial commodity, i.e. anyone (any woman actually) can walk in and buy it. In the EU & UK at least these labs exist only to treat infertility (yes, I know that’s bad in iteslf).
Looking to the future: will couple contemplating marriage have to get DNA scans to make sure they aren’t half-sibs or first cousins?
This is the scariest part of all. A future generation of children with major medical and mental problems due to the fact that their Mom and Dad are sister and brother or at the very least first cousins.Looking to the future: will couple contemplating marriage have to get DNA scans to make sure they aren’t half-sibs or first cousins?