S
stjosephtomasi
Guest
I’ve never seen a great explanation of Jesus’ words on the cross. Yes, I understand that He was quoting an OT psalm. But did He really believe God had abandoned Him? Surely not, right?
I think at that moment when Jesus took the sins of the world upon himself, He was in fact separated from God, who is all-holy. That is the curse of hell, to be cut off from God. That is the punishment we don’t have to suffer, because He did. So I think He felt that horror, which would have been even more horrible for Him as He had never been out of relationship with God for even a minute.2 Cor. 5:21 For our sake he made him to be sin who did not know sin, so that we might become the righteousness of God in him.
Exactly - not that God HAD in fact abandoned Him - He never abandons any of us, but He was permitted to feel that sense of separation from God that is part and parcel of sin.I think at that moment when Jesus took the sins of the world upon himself, He was in fact separated from God, who is all-holy. That is the curse of hell, to be cut off from God. That is the punishment we don’t have to suffer, because He did. So I think He felt that horror, which would have been even more horrible for Him as He had never been out of relationship with God for even a minute.
In his human nature, as all human nature is separated from God by sin. Remember ‘not my will, but thine, be done’? His human will was not always entirely at one with God’s will, no human will can be.If He is God, how could He be seperated from Himself?
Do you mean separated from God, the Father?
That phrase is only a tiny part of Psalm22-You should read the whole psalm to get the real impact of what Jesus was trying to say.I’ve never seen a great explanation of Jesus’ words on the cross. Yes, I understand that He was quoting an OT psalm. But did He really believe God had abandoned Him? Surely not, right?
Christ communicated with the Father via the H.S.Exactly - not that God HAD in fact abandoned Him - He never abandons any of us, but He was permitted to feel that sense of separation from God that is part and parcel of sin.
.
This quote might actually help explain to me your other post questioning the Marian doctrines. Jesus had two natures but was one person, inidvisibly so. God was born of Mary, baptised by John, performed miracles, was betrayed, died on the cross. Some of it we can not understand but it is true, the Person of God the Son died on the cross. There is no division. He was not Fully God AND fully man. But BOTH God and Man. A slight but very important nuance which might explain your relectance to contemplate the incredible holiness and honour which Mary held as a vessel of this God. Heres the Catechism…BRB1 – Jesus died on the cross, but remember, Jesus is fully God AND fully man. God cannot die, but man can. The death of Jesus on the cross did not separate Him from the Father (or even from the Holy Spirit). Hope this helps!
Maybe you got a good answer for this all ready, but “Son of God” really means “Son of the Father”. In the New Testament, ‘God’ is usually a title for God the Father. (The divine title for Jesus is usually “Lord”.)If He is God, how could He be seperated from Himself?
Do you mean separated from God, the Father?
Oh yeah, and how could he be called “Son of God” if the Son and the Father are one and He is God?
Except the Catholic Link does speak of Christ as being briefly separated from the Father … by OUR sins.BRB1 – Jesus died on the cross, but remember, Jesus is fully God AND fully man. God cannot die, but man can. The death of Jesus on the cross did not separate Him from the Father (or even from the Holy Spirit). Hope this helps!