My Handicapped Son

  • Thread starter Thread starter daddyboy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

daddyboy

Guest
I’m looking for more than implied suggstions about my handicapped son’s standing in the church. I’ve read thru the catechism twice, the documents of Vatin II. Since Glenn functions at age 3 and is nonverbal, I’m told he cannot recieve eucharist. Does the church have a position on this type parishoner?
 
Yes.
Matthew 18:1-5

At that time the disciples came to Jesus, saying, “Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?” And calling to him a child, he put him in the midst of them, and said, "Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child, he is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. Whoever receives one such child in my name receives me; "

God bless you and your family.
 
I am not sure, but I send my prayers. Another handicapped child just received thier First Holy Communion just the other day at my church.
 
It depends on the degree of handicap, I think. If your son is functioning at the cognitive level of a 3 year old, it’s probably a pretty severe handicap. So:

If he has been baptized, he is free from sin. He does not have the cognitive capability to know right from wrong and therefore is incapable of sin. Baptism erases original sin, therefore, he is sinless.

Heck, he’s probably the holiest person in this hemisphere. 😃
 
40.png
daddyboy:
I’m looking for more than implied suggstions about my handicapped son’s standing in the church. I’ve read thru the catechism twice, the documents of Vatin II. Since Glenn functions at age 3 and is nonverbal, I’m told he cannot recieve eucharist. Does the church have a position on this type parishoner?
I My son is autistic and is now 17. He recieves Communion every time he goes to Mass on Sunday’s. He made his First Communion at age 9. He is non-verbal and is about 6 to 8 years old developmentally. Although he could not make a proper Confession, some prayers were said over him. He also recieved his Confirmation at age 14. I have never been told by anyone that he is not allowed to particpate in his Catholic Faith. My Pastor is very supportive of us. We teach him his CCD lessons at home at his level.
 
There are three severly handicapped persons in my parish who attend mass with their families and receive Holy Communion faithfully every week. And I don’t think this is unusual; I see the same thing in other churches in my travels. I would make an appointment with the pastor and ask him to reconsider, formally requesting that your son be allowed to receive first Holy Communion. If your request is denied, take up the matter with the bishop.
 
40.png
urquhart:
There are three severly handicapped persons in my parish who attend mass with their families and receive Holy Communion faithfully every week. And I don’t think this is unusual; I see the same thing in other churches in my travels. I would make an appointment with the pastor and ask him to reconsider, formally requesting that your son be allowed to receive first Holy Communion. If your request is denied, take up the matter with the bishop.
If they do not have the proper mental capacity then it’s a clean cut deal. It is not a punishment, or an injustice to withhold communion from those who do not have the capacity to comprehend the mystery. To do otherwise is an injustice. I have no knowledge of the particular circumstances, that is between the parents and the priest, but one should endeavor to ensure that one is not receiving Our Lord without knowledge of what is going on.

Can. 913 §1. The administration of the Most Holy Eucharist to children requires that they have sufficient knowledge and careful preparation so that they understand the mystery of Christ according to their capacity and are able to receive the body of Christ with faith and devotion.

§2. The Most Holy Eucharist, however, can be administered to children in danger of death if they can distinguish the body of Christ from ordinary food and receive communion reverently.
 
40.png
Trelow:
If they do not have the proper mental capacity then it’s a clean cut deal. It is not a punishment, or an injustice to withhold communion from those who do not have the capacity to comprehend the mystery. To do otherwise is an injustice. I have no knowledge of the particular circumstances, that is between the parents and the priest, but one should endeavor to ensure that one is not receiving Our Lord without knowledge of what is going on.

Can. 913 §1. The administration of the Most Holy Eucharist to children requires that they have sufficient knowledge and careful preparation so that they understand the mystery of Christ according to their capacity and are able to receive the body of Christ with faith and devotion.

§2. The Most Holy Eucharist, however, can be administered to children in danger of death if they can distinguish the body of Christ from ordinary food and receive communion reverently.
Well then, I guess they really shouldn’t have given Terri Schiavo communion as she really didn’t have the capacity to understand what she was receiving. I can see where “sufficient knowledge” might have a different interpretation when dealing with someone who is suffering from a disease.
 
40.png
Ham1:
Well then, I guess they really shouldn’t have given Terri Schiavo communion as she really didn’t have the capacity to understand what she was receiving. I can see where “sufficient knowledge” might have a different interpretation when dealing with someone who is suffering from a disease.
Wouldn’t this be an entirely different situation? A child who has never and could never have the cognitive ability, vs someone who did have the cognitive ability and was given the sacrements at that time. Thus, Terri did have the ability to know right from wrong and thus the predisposition to sin (as all of us do, unfortunately) vs an eternal 3 year old who will never have the cognitive ability to distinguish right from wrong.
 
That Canon is nonsense, but then I am an Eastern Catholic so that Code of Canon Law does not apply.

We in the Byzantine Churches communion our infants. When they are Baptized they are also Chrismated (Confirmed) and then recieve First Eucharist at the Divine Liturgy that follows. They are then given communion from then on.

I would approach your bishop and discuss this with him.

I do not think this Canon really applies to people in your son’s condition.
 
the US Bishops have published guidelines on this very topic. The judgement on whether the individual has the capacity to understand who Jesus is, that the consecrated host is different than ordinary bread and that it is truly Jesus, should be made by the parents, those who are in charge of the child’s education and training and spiritual care, with the pastor. It is very wrong to make a blanket decision that “someone functioning at a 3 yr old level cannot know Jesus or understand what communion is”. many 3-year olds do in fact know very well who Jesus is and the meaning of holy communion. If he is non-verbal, there are other ways of communicating, that you know best. For instance, his demeanor at Mass may convey reverence, awe, excitement, awareness. The judgement should always err on the side of conferring the sacrament.

In any case he should of course be baptized and confirmed. If his condition is such that his life expectancy could be shortened he should be confirmed as soon as possible.

He very likely is incapable of mortal sin and would not need confession before communion.

It may be that after careful consideration your pastor may advise waiting. Such children can make remarkable progress, beyond what is expected, and he may surprise you all.

Know this, that the Holy Spirit works directly in such individuals, beyond the cognitive level that limits the rest of us, to achieve in their souls wonders that will be beyond those of us with “normal” intelligence until we reach heaven.
As you know, my personal opinion is that the practice in the Eastern Rite churches is more in line with the theology of the sacraments, and that baptism, confirmation and first communion should be given to infants and children at the same time. I believe we are moving in that direction, under the impetus and influence of the RCIA.
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
the US Bishops have published guidelines on this very topic. The judgement on whether the individual has the capacity to understand who Jesus is, that the consecrated host is different than ordinary bread and that it is truly Jesus, should be made by the parents, those who are in charge of the child’s education and training and spiritual care, with the pastor.
This is something I have touble reconciling.

We in the Byzantine Churches give communion to children who are 6 months old and in some cases younger. I do not see what the capacity to understand has to do with this.
 
I’m a Latin Catholic, but I agree with ByzCath that this particular rule is non-sense. Young children aren’t capable of discerning God in the Eucharist the way an adult is, but they are also free from personal sin and deserving of the Food of Life. We teach our young children to pray, to talk with God, but do not allow them to directly commune with Him? I find all justifications of this attitude to be highly flawed.

I submit to the rules of my church, but I do NOT agree with this particular one, and I feel it should be changed and brought more in line with the other Catholic churches.
 
:love: As I posted earilier my very handicap Autistic, Mute, and developmentally delayed 17 year old son recieves every week. He is as pure and innocent as we all try to be. He knows he is going to Church because every Saturday night before bedtime prayers (I say them, he kneels at his bed) he signs “Church” For someone to say he or any of his peers are uncapable of understanding simply do not take the time to understand these sweet children themselves. They can be taught to Love God and understand in the simplest terms. :gopray2: It just takes time. When Jesus said “Let the little children come to me.” he never said leave the handicap ones home.BTW, he seems to have more understanding and devotion then most teenagers his age. God Bless my sweet boy and all the children of the world.:amen:
 
40.png
ByzCath:
This is something I have touble reconciling.

We in the Byzantine Churches give communion to children who are 6 months old and in some cases younger. I do not see what the capacity to understand has to do with this.
like it or not, canon law for the Latin Rite states that to receive holy communion the individual must have reached the age of reason, and be properly prepared and disposed, and the test of readiness is not thorough grasp of all Catholic doctrine, but the ability to distinguish between ordinary bread and wine and the Eucharistic species, belief and understanding, according to one’s capacity, that the Eucharist is indeed the real, sacramentally present Body and Blood of Jesus, and express a desire to receive the sacrament, and not under any canonical bar to the sacraments.

If you disagree with this canon, might as well disagree with all of them. Make up your mind. As I have said many times, I believe the Eastern Rite practice reflects better the theology of the sacraments of initiation, however, I am not in charge.

The differences arose from historical as much as doctrinal reasons, which will have to be dealt with if and when the rules are changed.

The difficulty comes in interpreting “prepared” “disposed” and “understanding” too strictly in regards to the capacity of the individual, and there the canon says to err on the side of conferring the sacrament. Baptism and confirmation should never be delayed on the basis of a handicap, physical or mental.
 
kaymart said:
:love: As I posted earilier my very handicap Autistic, Mute, and developmentally delayed 17 year old son recieves every week. He is as pure and innocent as we all try to be. He knows he is going to Church because every Saturday night before bedtime prayers (I say them, he kneels at his bed) he signs “Church” For someone to say he or any of his peers are uncapable of understanding simply do not take the time to understand these sweet children themselves. They can be taught to Love God and understand in the simplest terms. :gopray2: It just takes time. When Jesus said “Let the little children come to me.” he never said leave the handicap ones home.BTW, he seems to have more understanding and devotion then most teenagers his age. God Bless my sweet boy and all the children of the world.:amen:

I’m not saying otherwise, just that it isn’t a matter to be taken lightly. From my understanding you have gone though the proper channels. What I was objecting to was going to the bishop if your priest isn’t convinced that he is able to discern.

If the parents and the priest are able to conclude that the individual is capable of having an understanding to what is going on, then that’s great! Again my objection is to going over the priest, whom would have much more contact with the individual and thusly a better understanding.
 
40.png
puzzleannie:
like it or not, canon law for the Latin Rite states that to receive holy communion the individual must have reached the age of reason, and be properly prepared and disposed, and the test of readiness is not thorough grasp of all Catholic doctrine, but the ability to distinguish between ordinary bread and wine and the Eucharistic species, belief and understanding, according to one’s capacity, that the Eucharist is indeed the real, sacramentally present Body and Blood of Jesus, and express a desire to receive the sacrament, and not under any canonical bar to the sacraments.

If you disagree with this canon, might as well disagree with all of them. Make up your mind. As I have said many times, I believe the Eastern Rite practice reflects better the theology of the sacraments of initiation, however, I am not in charge.
annie,
Don’t get me wrong, as I said, I am not a Latin Catholic so that Canon does not apply to me, the closest canon I can find in the Code of Canons of Oriental Churchs is

Canon 697
Sacramental initiation in the mystery of salvation is perfected in the reception of the Divine Eucharist, and thus the Divine Eucharist is administered after baptism and chrismation with holy myron as soon as possible according to the norms of the particular law of the each Church sui iuris.

I can dislike and disagree with any Canon in Canon Law, even the ones that apply to me, but I must live by them.

Just as I disagree with the speed limit on some roads but I follow them.
The differences arose from historical as much as doctrinal reasons, which will have to be dealt with if and when the rules are changed.

The difficulty comes in interpreting “prepared” “disposed” and “understanding” too strictly in regards to the capacity of the individual, and there the canon says to err on the side of conferring the sacrament. Baptism and confirmation should never be delayed on the basis of a handicap, physical or mental.
Yes I understand why the changes occured but I think it is time the Church starts to explore restoring them, which is starting to happen.

And I agree that some are interpreting things to striclty but I also think some priests are letting others have a say in this, like DREs and others who help prepare people for the sacraments, who should not have a say.
 
40.png
Trelow:
I’m not saying otherwise, just that it isn’t a matter to be taken lightly. From my understanding you have gone though the proper channels. What I was objecting to was going to the bishop if your priest isn’t convinced that he is able to discern.

If the parents and the priest are able to conclude that the individual is capable of having an understanding to what is going on, then that’s great! Again my objection is to going over the priest, whom would have much more contact with the individual and thusly a better understanding.
Trelow,
I disagree with this.

The Bishop is the pastor of the diocese and shepard of the flock, not the parish priest. The parish priest has been delegated the aurthority to act as pastor for a given parish but the ultimate pastor is the bishop.

It is right to approach the bishop if you disagree with your priest.
 
40.png
ByzCath:
Trelow,
I disagree with this.

The Bishop is the pastor of the diocese and shepard of the flock, not the parish priest. The parish priest has been delegated the aurthority to act as pastor for a given parish but the ultimate pastor is the bishop.

It is right to approach the bishop if you disagree with your priest.
In general yes, but I would hope that your priest would have a much greater knowledge of the limitations of your child. I would hope that in the least he would recommend that you spend a few months trying to help him to understand what is going on, then re-approach.
 
40.png
ByzCath:
annie,
Don’t get me wrong, as I said, I am not a Latin Catholic so that Canon does not apply to me, the closest canon I can find in the Code of Canons of Oriental Churchs is

.
very true, but we are discussing a case in a family that belongs to the latin rite, so I don’t think further discussion in this vein will be helpful to this parent
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top