My Idea To Fight Abortion Industry!

[Chris_LaRock]

As many of you know, there are a lot of people walking around who have survived botched abortion attempts. Many of them are handicapped and scarred for life as a result of these sickos and their cold blooded practices.

Maybe they should all join together and file a class action lawsuit against the abortion industry. It could end up before the supreme court and get Roe v. Wade overturned!

 

[Christy_Beth]

But, how many would actually take part in this? And would the courts even hear the case? As will most cases, if it goes before the Supreme Court, it will take years. And the judges at the Suprememe court refuse to hear a lot of cases. They can’t hear every one.

 

[gmags2003]

It would get overturned presuming the same Judges that are there now are still there for many years.

 

[Chris_LaRock]

But, how many would actually take part in this? And would the courts even hear the case? As will most cases, if it goes before the Supreme Court, it will take years. And the judges at the Suprememe court refuse to hear a lot of cases. They can’t hear every one.

Just immagine the publicity it would get! Dozens of people who were injured or crippled as a result of their mothers attempting to have them aborted suing the abortion industry for their pain and suffering! Even if the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, they could always go elsewhere and find a court that will.

 

[Chris_LaRock]

I suggested that people who survived being aborted could band together and file a class action lawsuit against the abortion industry. Of course, this would be a lawsuit against various companies. Planned Parenthood isn’t the only abortion provider, after all.

I would like to expand on that idea. I got to thinking about the foster parents who adopt babies who survive botched abortion attempts, and how expensive it must be to raise a child with severe handicaps. Logically, the abortionists who purposely caused the handicaps in an effort to murder those children should be required by law to pay any and all medical expenses of that child. In other words, foster parents of children who survived abortion attempts should be compensated financially by the people who caused the handicaps to begin with. It would be very easy to prove in a court of law that an abortionist purposely inflicted harm on the child…IT’S WHAT THEY DO FOR A LIVING!!! They can’t waltz into the courtroom and say,

“Oh! I didn’t mean to inject that saline solution into the womb, crippling that poor child! It was an accident!”

Also, girls/ women who have abortions against their will. Many of them tell the abortionist to his/ her face that they don’t want to abort their child. Many abortionists respond by knocking the girl out with drugs or calling in assistants to restrain her so they can carry out the abortion. Certainly, these girls/ women should be able to file a wrongful death suit against the abortionists and the clinic that engages in such activities. Remember, the only time the law doesn’t consider it murder to kill an unborn child is when the mother gives consent. Otherwise, people get arrested. It’s just that simple. Parents who force their daughters to abort against their will should also be legally liable as well.

If we are going to fight the abortionists, we must do so on several fronts. In warfare, you will have various battles in various places - all contributing to the same victory.

We Can Win!!!

 

[RachelsAlumni]

you might be interested, then, in these stories:

The Survivors of Abortion
It’s something that is rarely discussed, but sometimes children do survive abortion attempts. It’s impossible to know exactly how many survive. However, here are a few stories of individuals we know have survived abortion attmepts. Some of them escaped relatively unharmed. Others were profoundly injured by their abortions. Their stories deserved to be told, regardless. Where possible, a photo of the abortion survivor has been provided so that you can attach a real, human face to the victims of abortions, who are so often dehumanized by efforts to defend abortion.

Ximena Renaerts

Ximena’s odessy with Vancouver General Hospital began on Dec. 16, 1985, the day she was born. After attempting an abortion at a free-standing mill in Bellingham, Wash. Ximena’s birth mother entered VGH, where she gave birth. According to court documents, staff delivered the child into a “hat”–a plastic pot–and then senior nurse Vera Wood whisked her away. Ximena was placed in a room “where dead fetuses were stored,” even though she was “moving, gasping, (and) crying weakly.”

Court documents say Wood checked back some 26 minutes later, to find the child still alive. A nursing supervisor was called and arrived almost an hour after Ximena’s birth. She found the child still in the “hat,” uncovered, on a stainless-steel counter. By the time the Infant Transport Team arrived, Ximena had suffered a severe loss of heat, which in turn caused extensive and permanent brain damage.

Ximena’s adoptive family eventually sued VGH for $10 million. Hospital officials petitioned to have the case heard before a judge only, but the B.C. Supreme Court ruled it would be best heard before a jury. In June of this year, facing the prospect of a public trial, the hospital settled out of court for an undisclosed amount of money. All family members will say is that Ximena will be well taken care of.

 

[DL82]

Another option would be to find some technicality in the abortion process, which would make it prohibitively difficult for abortion to take place, such as ensuring that there was never a circumstance where the fetus’s heart was beating (independent life) AFTER the umbilical cord had been cut/broken inside the womb.

The very act of monitoring this would make abortion prohibitively expensive, and doctors would be too frightened to break this law, as a botched abortion would become either murder or manslaughter.

Alternatively, many states’ laws say that women need adequate medical counselling before an abortion, you could conduct extensive psychiatric research to show what ‘adequate counselling’ would entail. The required level of counselling support would probably be more than any current abortion clinic is equipped to provide.

The Atlantic slave trade was stopped by passing a law against British ships flying under the neutral American flag. Very few people even realised what the law was designed to do until it was too late!

 

[Chris_LaRock]

Another option would be to find some technicality in the abortion process, which would make it prohibitively difficult for abortion to take place, such as ensuring that there was never a circumstance where the fetus’s heart was beating (independent life) AFTER the umbilical cord had been cut/broken inside the womb.

The very act of monitoring this would make abortion prohibitively expensive, and doctors would be too frightened to break this law, as a botched abortion would become either murder or manslaughter.

Alternatively, many states’ laws say that women need adequate medical counselling before an abortion, you could conduct extensive psychiatric research to show what ‘adequate counselling’ would entail. The required level of counselling support would probably be more than any current abortion clinic is equipped to provide.

The Atlantic slave trade was stopped by passing a law against British ships flying under the neutral American flag. Very few people even realised what the law was designed to do until it was too late!

I forget what state it is, but they passed a law saying that abortionists are required to show a woman a sonogram and explain that she’s taking a human life by aborting, and that severe mental health problems might arise from her decision.

All of the clinics closed and the abortionists refuse to work under those conditions.

 

[Chris_LaRock]

you might be interested, then, in these stories:

Thank you for that story. I forwarded my idea to Priests For Life, and am awaiting a response. I can see Fr. Frank contacting all of the abortion survivors and convincing them to file the class action lawsuit right now!