J
Jacob1
Guest
I waited 45 minutes and he never showed up Someone at the church said he forgets regularly. Are my sins still unforgiven because of this?
Yes. You didn’t receive the Sacrament.Are my sins still unforgiven because of this?
This is true BUT you can’t receive Communion until you’ve actually confessed any mortal sins in Confession including their kind & number.Are you sorry for your sins because they offend God, and not only because you’re concerned about eternal damnation? If so, then you have perfect contrition. That forgives sins, if you’re resolved to get to confession when possible. Get to confession when you can, and don’t worry about it. You’re good.![]()
Umm…no, that’s not my understanding. Can you point me to a citation of Church teaching that makes this assertion?This is true BUT you can’t receive Communion until you’ve actually confessed any mortal sins in Confession including their kind & number.
My understanding is Jen7 is correct. Assuming the OP was going to confess one or more mortal or grave-possibly mortal sins, then he’s not in a state of Grace till he confesses and gets absolved. If for reasons beyond his control he can’t yet confess, then perfect contrition would keep him out of hell if he were hit by a bus leaving the church. However, assuming he’s not hit by a bus, he can’t receive communion until he’s actually absolved. The common sense argument here is that if a priest is present to consecrate and distribute Communion, then the priest is also available for Confession, so you can’t argue that you had no access to Confession. However, I will look for something more official.Umm…no, that’s not my understanding. Can you point me to a citation of Church teaching that makes this assertion?
Bottom line is that as described in the linked post, both CCC 1457 and Can. 916 say that if you’ve committed a mortal sin, then even if you have deep contrition, you must receive sacramental absolution before receiving communion, unless there’s a “grave reason” for you to receive. I presume a “grave reason” would be you’re in danger of death, or you’re trying to save the Body of Christ from Satanists by consuming it, that sort of thing. Not just “the priest didn’t happen to show up for confession on Saturday and now it’s time for Sunday Mass”.Yes that is correct. Catechism: 1385 To respond to this invitation we must prepare ourselves for so great and so holy a moment. St. Paul urges us to examine our conscience: "Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself."218 …
There must be a grave reason, such as possible death.Jen7:![]()
Umm…no, that’s not my understanding. Can you point me to a citation of Church teaching that makes this assertion?This is true BUT you can’t receive Communion until you’ve actually confessed any mortal sins in Confession including their kind & number.
CIC1457 According to the Church’s command, "after having attained the age of discretion, each of the faithful is bound by an obligation faithfully to confess serious sins at least once a year."56 Anyone who is aware of having committed a mortal sin must not receive Holy Communion, even if he experiences deep contrition, without having first received sacramental absolution, unless he has a grave reason for receiving Communion and there is no possibility of going to confession.57 Children must go to the sacrament of Penance before receiving Holy Communion for the first time.58
56 Cf. CIC, Can. 989; Council of Trent (1551): DS 1683; DS 1708.
57 Cf. Council of Trent (1551): DS 1647; 1661; CIC, can. 916; CCEO, can. 711.
58 Cf. CIC, can. 914.
Can. 988 §1. A member of the Christian faithful is obliged to confess in kind and number all grave sins committed after baptism and not yet remitted directly through the keys of the Church nor acknowledged in individual confession, of which the person has knowledge after diligent examination of conscience.
Yes, it’s this exception that I was thinking of, but I didn’t remember that it was in the CCC and canon law.I presume a “grave reason” would be you’re in danger of death, or you’re trying to save the Body of Christ from Satanists by consuming it, that sort of thing. Not just “the priest didn’t happen to show up for confession on Saturday and now it’s time for Sunday Mass”.
With all due respect, you seem to be bending over backwards to find an exception for the OP to just go to communion because the priest didn’t show up.(which would seem to give the OP the opportunity to go to communion in this case and then go to confession later)
Since your profile is hidden, I can’t tell if you’re representing here as a Catholic, but from your many past comments asking about basic teachings, my guess is that you are not.Its amazing how bogged down we can get with technicalities and legalistic language instead of relying on the grace of God. The OP is repentant and tried to do the right thing.
They don’t appear to agree based on what you posted. They said that “danger of death” or “serious embarrassment” are grave reasons to receive. I explained above that there has been no grave reason to receive here.I’m just quoting Beal and Coriden… who, incidentally, agree with my take on it.
![]()
If this is directed towards me and the others who pointed out that your initial advice is at best incomplete and at worst in error, I and others are trying to give the correct Catholic teaching to someone who asked a question. That’s the purpose of the forum.Maybe forcing others to do so, though, is something that we should think twice about;
To be fair, the OP only asked “are my sins unforgiven?”They don’t appear to agree based on what you posted.
others who pointed out that your initial advice is at best incomplete and at worst in error
Assuming Beal and Coriden are a magisterially loyal source, and not some flaky 1970s thing like the problematical catechism Christ Among Us (Anthony Wilhelm, avoid this book like the plague!), this sounds reasonable. Father Robert J Fox, whose magisterial loyalty was absolute and never subject to question, pointed out in Catholic Truth For Youth that there could be circumstances where not receiving communion with one’s family would basically amount to a manifestation of conscience — he was very careful to warn young people that this privilege must never be abused — and that the young person, unfortunate enough to have committed a mortal sin, could make an Act of Perfect Contrition, receive, and resolve to go to confession as soon as possible (to confess the repented mortal sin, not to confess having received under these circumstances, for that is no sin).On the subject of c.916, Beal and Coriden says, “grave reasons for going to communion without confessing include danger of death and serious embarrassment if communion is not taken. Lack of opportunity to confess includes absence of a confessor, inability to approach the confessor at a schedule time for the sacrament, and the availability only of a confessor who is known personally and who cannot be approached without embarrassment.”
It’s a pretty standard resource:Assuming Beal and Coriden are a magisterially loyal source, and not some flaky 1970s thing