That said, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt, but I do agree it did seem to me also like you came across pretty harshly judgmental against the mother because she was working and not staying at home. I don’t think there is anything inherently sinful with working or stay-at-home moms. Both require hard work and sacrifice in different ways and have benefits and drawbacks. Maybe we misunderstood your intent?
My reaction to the story was to first feel horrible for the baby, then angry at the situation that caused the child’s suffering, and then to feel sympathy for the family and the mother who has to live with the guilt of this. I took a cue from one of the posts in this thread and read some things about “empathic over-arousal” and it led me to some writings on empathy. Apparently, empathy is the first step in the development of morality in human thinking. You cannot have moral judgment without first having empathy for how one person’s actions affect other people. That was interesting to me.
There’s a difference between having great empathy for a person’s mistake, and genuinely forgiving a person’s mistake, and excusing a person’s mistake. I feel great empathy and sympathy for the mother’s mistake. I forgive her for being human and becoming distracted and forgetting her child for 8 hours.
I know, of course, that she did not intend to do this and she will punish herself for the rest of her life. I would give her a hug and tell her I am sorry if I saw her. I don’t want her to suffer anymore than she has. I will not say, though, that this was an entirely blameless situation for the mother and that it could happen to absolutely anyone. In this case, the mom had a mirror that was pointed directly at her child, and so she was in her line of sight when she went into autopilot and forgot her child. This mother had to have been under a great deal of stress and pressure. She was by all accounts a wonderful mother, but she put herself under too much pressure. That is forgivable, and it does not detract from her character. I do believe she is a loving mother. But it is not excusable. See the difference? Something that is excusable is something that we could never prevent no matter how hard we tried and we have no control over the situation. Here, I think there are some things society should do as a whole to prevent things like this. For example- alarms in the car might help, but more than anything people just need to slow down and live a more simple life. Live as simply as possible so you can put your children first emotionally.
When my youngest daughter was born, I had no choice but to work. I would have given anything to have been able to stay home with her, but I could not. She had to be in daycare, and there was nothing I could do. However, she was within walking distance and I nursed her at lunch. I always was mentally checking her in my mind, thinking, “ok, where is she? Is she ok now?”.
The mom who had this terrible accident had some kind of break down in her mind that prevented her from focusing on her child for a crucial moment. In her case, it was reported that the mom had a change in routine. So, that makes sense. BUT, then the babysitter who was supposed to take care of the little girl said mom had not even called her the night before as she was supposed to and she had no idea where the little girl was supposed to be that day.
I am a sinner and an imperfect mother, and I pray for mercy, love, and forgiveness and healing for the family. I do not excuse, though, the general need that we all have to not deliberately over-stress ourselves so we can be there for our children. Make sense?