My religion is better than your religion

  • Thread starter Thread starter DelScorcho
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting example… I also do not think there is anything wrong with premaritial sex. Actually my wife and I lived together for four years before we were married (in a Catholic church).
:confused: I thought you were some kind of Presbyterian? You have already pointed out that Church law doesn’t apply to you. How or why did you end up getting married in a Catholic Church? (Normally, at least one party to the marriage has to be a practicing Catholic.)
We have now been together almost 20 years and been married for 14 years.
That’s nice. 🙂

Like I said, sometimes people get lucky.
 
Does the church ever “hypothesize”???
Yes. For example, currently, there is a hypothesis that Mary is Mediatrix of All Graces. The issue is being studied, and a ruling will come out one way or the other when a conclusion has been reached. 🙂
 
There are multiple religions for a reason: not all people believe the same things. And religion seems to be anad have been the crux of most conflicts in the world… the “my religion is the better religion and you need to agree with me” argument.
This is a profoundly inaccurate statement. The greatest conflicts had nothing to do with religion.
 
:confused: I thought you were some kind of Presbyterian? You have already pointed out that Church law doesn’t apply to you. How or why did you end up getting married in a Catholic Church? (Normally, at least one party to the marriage has to be a practicing Catholic.)

That’s nice. 🙂

Like I said, sometimes people get lucky.
Thanks…

My wife was Catholic at the time. We did not have a Mass though.
 
Yes. For example, currently, there is a hypothesis that Mary is Mediatrix of All Graces. The issue is being studied, and a ruling will come out one way or the other when a conclusion has been reached. 🙂
Just as I thought… church rules are made by man.

No big deal… but a fact is a fact.

(If God was telling them directly, they would not need a committee.)

👍
 
Just as I thought… church rules are made by man.
Discovered by man. Not made by man. If they were just making something up, it would only take a year, and Jerry Bruckheimer would be in charge of it; not Joseph Ratzinger. 😉
No big deal… but a fact is a fact.
(If God was telling them directly, they would not need a committee.)
It took three “committees” (Synods) before we got the Bible. What’s your take on the Bible - comes from God, or made up by men?
 
DelScorcho, do you have a response to the points I have made in response to you, or are you going to sweep them aside?
 
It is interesting, but it has nothing to do with what I asked you. I didn’t ask about the authorship of the individual books; I asked about the listing of those individual books into one Codex, which we today call the Bible. (You are aware, I trust, that there was a great deal more writing going on in the first century than ended up in the Bible, ultimately - and that someone had to edit down the list of books that were considered “the Bible.”)

Is the list of books (which was arrived at “by committee” to use your terminology) - not the books themselves, regardless of authorship - the list: was it man-made, or was it given by God?
 
for the same reason Mr Fausto gave when he disagreed with my initial assertion… except in reverse.
We’ll jump all over him later, if he makes a habit of asserting without evidence. 😉

I think it’s actually the 11th Commandment of the Catholic Church - “Thou shalt not make assertions without backing them up with convincing evidence.” 😛
 
Which is the entire point of this thread.

Another tangent: Just for fun, and I will not debate it… is there any Catholic doctrine(s) that you would like to see made into law… like make birth control illegal, etc?
Many Catholic teachings on morals are already law. Prohibition of murder, stealing, and fraud are moral teachings.

Do you have a problem with these things being illegal?
 
DelScorcho, out of curiosity, do you have any response to my reply to you earlier? I would like to see how you bridge the logical disconnect that I think you have. I mean no disrespect.
 
It is interesting, but it has nothing to do with what I asked you. I didn’t ask about the authorship of the individual books; I asked about the listing of those individual books into one Codex, which we today call the Bible. (You are aware, I trust, that there was a great deal more writing going on in the first century than ended up in the Bible, ultimately - and that someone had to edit down the list of books that were considered “the Bible.”)

Is the list of books (which was arrived at “by committee” to use your terminology) - not the books themselves, regardless of authorship - the list: was it man-made, or was it given by God?
Man made.
 
We’ll jump all over him later, if he makes a habit of asserting without evidence. 😉

I think it’s actually the 11th Commandment of the Catholic Church - “Thou shalt not make assertions without backing them up with convincing evidence.” 😛
LOL – Thanks! 👍
 
DelScorcho, out of curiosity, do you have any response to my reply to you earlier? I would like to see how you bridge the logical disconnect that I think you have. I mean no disrespect.
Please refresh my memory… I think it was a ways back.
 
Catholics wrote the Ten Commandments??
No, God wrote them. Moses brought them down off the mountain. They were laws given to the Jews. Catholics/Christians adopted them and these commandments were further codified into secular law in most countries…at least the “civilized” ones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top