Mystery of Faith - which form?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eroche
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

eroche

Guest
In the Missal there are three forms of the Mystery of Faith:
After the words of Consecration the priest says:
The mystery of faith.
The people continue, acclaiming:
We proclaim your Death, O Lord,
and profess your Resurrection
until you come again.
Or:
When we eat this Bread and drink this Cup,
we proclaim your Death, O Lord,
until you come again.
Or:
Save us, Saviour of the world,
for by your Cross and Resurrection
you have set us free.
Who chooses which form to use? How can the people, “en masse”, make a choice?
 
In the Missal there are three forms of the Mystery of Faith:

Who chooses which form to use? How can the people, “en masse”, make a choice?
The priest chooses, or delegates his choosing ability to the music director.
 
The priest chooses. He says the first two or three words and everyone continues along.
 
So far our parish has only used the first of the three forms.

I suppose when we introduce others the people will figure it out like they’ve done in the past: the accompanist will play a short intro or a chord so the people know which one to sing. On weekdays, if there is no singing, then the default will probably be the first one.
 
I have to say, on this, I preferred the old one better (Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again).

But, not my choice!
 
In the Missal there are three forms of the Mystery of Faith:

Who chooses which form to use? How can the people, “en masse”, make a choice?
Actually, there is only one Mystery of Faith–that is, the Body and Blood of Christ.

The prayer is the Memorial Acclamation.

This misunderstanding was caused by the old ICEL adaptation “Let us proclaim the Mystery of Faith” leading people to think that it is the name of the prayer that follows.

To answer your real question though, it’s the right of the priest-celebrant to decide the options in the Mass, including this one.
 
I have to say, on this, I preferred the old one better (Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again).

But, not my choice!
That one is the most flawed one and it is why it was dropped. It was only in the English Missal, it does not appear in the Latin nor in any of the other languages.
 
My parish uses all three. We seem to have an affinity for the, “By your death and ressurection,” one, though. The organist is the cantor as well, so he sings the first word and then we get it, but usually, he’s singing by himself.
I have to say, on this, I preferred the old one better (Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again).

But, not my choice!
This one wasn’t ever in the Latin missal. The flaw here is that with this one, we are talking about Jesus. With the three (true) other ones, we are talking to Jesus. It changes the structure and thus the idea behind it, besides its not being in the original missal, so it doesn’t work.

In the “old” (Extraordinary Form) missal of 1570,1962 edition, the words “mysterium fidei” were actually in the Words of Consecration for the chalice itself. The Consilium took them out and made the phrase a separate piece, right after the consecration of the chalice, not that this really has anything to do with it.
 
Actually, there is only one Mystery of Faith–that is, the Body and Blood of Christ.

The prayer is the Memorial Acclamation.

This misunderstanding was caused by the old ICEL adaptation “Let us proclaim the Mystery of Faith” leading people to think that it is the name of the prayer that follows.

To answer your real question though, it’s the right of the priest-celebrant to decide the options in the Mass, including this one.
Well the new one still introduces it by the priest saying “the mystery of faith”
 
I have to say, on this, I preferred the old one better (Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again).

But, not my choice!
Greetings Kerry77,

I am so glad that this psudo-acclamation is gone. It was not in the orginal Latin. I don’t miss it at all.

God Bless.
Anathama Sit
 
Actually, there is only one Mystery of Faith–that is, the Body and Blood of Christ.

The prayer is the Memorial Acclamation.

This misunderstanding was caused by the old ICEL adaptation “Let us proclaim the Mystery of Faith” leading people to think that it is the name of the prayer that follows.

To answer your real question though, it’s the right of the priest-celebrant to decide the options in the Mass, including this one.
Greetings FrDavid96,

Pleasure to see you again Father. I have a question, but can’t the priest delegate it to the Music Director. I know that I am free to choose the Acclamations because he delegated it to me.

Of course, I usually have the music pre-picked out several weeks ahead of time, so that he can approve of the choices and make any suggestions. There have been times where at the last minute he changes things.

God Bless.
Anathama Sit
 
My parish uses all three. We seem to have an affinity for the, “By your death and ressurection,” one, though. The organist is the cantor as well, so he sings the first word and then we get it, but usually, he’s singing by himself.
Greetings YoungTradCath,

Our parish has the affinity for the “When we eat this bread…” one. I also like the “Save us…” acclamation.

God Bless.
Anathama Sit
 
Greetings YoungTradCath,

Our parish has the affinity for the “When we eat this bread…” one. I also like the “Save us…” acclamation.

God Bless.
Anathama Sit
I don’t much care for the “When we eat this bread” one. It is theologically correct, but I don’t like to think of it as bread and wine.
 
I don’t much care for the “When we eat this bread” one. It is theologically correct, but I don’t like to think of it as bread and wine.
Unfortunately, that one is straight out of Scripture, from St. Paul himself who calls it bread (he uses “cup” or “chalice”, not “wine”).
 
Unfortunately, that one is straight out of Scripture, from St. Paul himself who calls it bread (he uses “cup” or “chalice”, not “wine”).
Mmk, cool. I never said there was anything wrong with it. I just don’t particularly care for it.
 
Greetings FrDavid96,

Pleasure to see you again Father. I have a question, but can’t the priest delegate it to the Music Director. I know that I am free to choose the Acclamations because he delegated it to me.

Of course, I usually have the music pre-picked out several weeks ahead of time, so that he can approve of the choices and make any suggestions. There have been times where at the last minute he changes things.

God Bless.
Anathama Sit
Hi there.

Yes, the priest can delegate that to someone else. That’s fine.

I said it the way I did because that was the direct answer to the OPs question of “who chooses?”
 
Well the new one still introduces it by the priest saying “the mystery of faith”
Yes. But the priest is really saying “[this Eucharist is] the Mystery of Faith” and not “let us proclaim…”

For example, if a priest were to say:
“let us proclaim/pray the Our Father” or
“let us pray the rosary”
or something similar to that, most people would just naturally think “that’s the prayer that comes up next”

The words of the ICEL adaptation “let us proclaim the mystery…” make it sound like the following words are the name of that prayer, whatever form was chosen. In other words, in the ICEL adaptation, the priest’s introduction refers to the next words instead of referring to the Eucharist, which is the actual intention of what the priest is saying at that moment. It’s just one more example of how the ICEL adaptation caused confusion and misunderstanding in the Mass. When the priest said “let us proclaim…” people missed the entire point of what he was really saying.
 
Yes. But the priest is really saying “[this Eucharist is] the Mystery of Faith” and not “let us proclaim…”

For example, if a priest were to say:
“let us proclaim/pray the Our Father” or
“let us pray the rosary”
or something similar to that, most people would just naturally think “that’s the prayer that comes up next”

The words of the ICEL adaptation “let us proclaim the mystery…” make it sound like the following words are the name of that prayer, whatever form was chosen. In other words, in the ICEL adaptation, the priest’s introduction refers to the next words instead of referring to the Eucharist, which is the actual intention of what the priest is saying at that moment. It’s just one more example of how the ICEL adaptation caused confusion and misunderstanding in the Mass. When the priest said “let us proclaim…” people missed the entire point of what he was really saying.
I get what you’re saying, but I don’t know if I’m convinced. I haven’t read this part of the missal recently so I’d need to go back…

However, the way its written is for the priest to sing “the mystery of faith” as an introduction to the congregation singing an acclamation. Our diocese instructed us that the memorial acc. is now called the “mystery of faith”

the content of the words we sing is about the paschal mystery…
 
Hi there.

Yes, the priest can delegate that to someone else. That’s fine.

I said it the way I did because that was the direct answer to the OPs question of “who chooses?”
Greetings FrDavid96,

Thanks so much. Just wanted to make sure all was okay on this end.

God Bless You.
Anathama Sit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top