How is rejecting one theory (that even you said is not proven) in favor of another equivalent to denying science?
How about if one scientist disagrees with another scientist which ones science is wrong? If Thomas Edison didn’t believe in evolution, does that mean we oughtn’t believe in electricity?
Here’s a scientific conclusion I could live with based on A recent genetic study of human genes:
accuracyingenesis.com/adam.html
Code:
A recent genetic study of human genes related to the brain concluded that possibly there appeared a "microcephalin variant (that) could have arisen anywhere from 14,000 to 60,000 years ago" and an "ASPM variant ranged from 500 to 14,000 years" ago and "roughly correlating with the development of written language, spread of agriculture and development of cities" (see more)
Now if one assumes that the “microcephalin variant could have arisen anywhere from 14,000 to 60,000 years ago”, possibly could correspond to the “Big Bang” or “Fortuitous Mutation” that Richard G. Klein refers to in his book “The Dawn of Human Culture” and says occurred about 50,000 years ago. Then, what about the “ASPM variant ranged from 500 to 14,000 years” ago and “roughly correlating with the development of written language, spread of agriculture and development of cities” as proposed.
The Bible repeatedly says that Adam and his immediate offspring were farmers
Genesis 2:15 And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and too keep it…
…More recent studies conducted by Melinda A Zeder and Brian Hesse (
Science 287 (2000) 2254-57) place the initial domestication of goats to the Zargos Mountains at about
10,000 years ago. In more recent studies they have adjusted the dates slightly and now place domestication of sheep and goats at
11,000 years ago, pigs at
10,500, and cattle at 10,000. “The earlier dates mean that animals were domesticated at much the same time as crop plants, and bear on the issue of how this ensemble of new agricultural species – the farming package known
as the Neolithic revolution – spread from the Near East to Europe.” And Manfred Heun’s (Science 278 (1997) 1312-14) studies indicate that large scale wheat cultivation began from 8,000 to 9,000 years ago near the Karacadag Mountains. Both areas are very near where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers come close together. …
…Conclusion:
We have summarized some of the data that seems to indicate that there was a cultural shift for humans that was brought on by the development of the farming society possibly allowed by the ASPM gene variant as early as 14,000 years ago. By examining the available archaeological data on the development of this farming community and comparing it to the Biblical Genesis description of Adam and his descendants we have attempted to demonstrate how this data provides us with an approximate time line for the Biblical Adam, the first man by Biblical definition, a farmer. Thus by farming man demonstrates his ability to;
… let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
Genesis 1:26
And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. Gen 1:29
I guess all those evolution scientist will be asking the above genetic scientists to remove their credentials from the pool.
God bless,
John
