S
ShowersofRoses
Guest
The Virgin Birth
Mary cooperated, so it was with the cooperation of man.Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit without the co-operation of man.
He meant that the Blessed Virgin became pregnant without sexual intercourseMary cooperated, so it was with the cooperation of man.
Why do you think it was phraed so awkwardly? Why not “the participation of a man”? Generally, “man” means something different from “a man.”Mary conceived by the Holy Spirit without the co-operation of man.
My copy of Ott was first published in 1954. I guess ‘Church-speak’ was a little different then. The important fact is that Mary conceived without having sexual intercourse.Why do you think it was phraed so awkwardly? Why not “the participation of a man”? Generally, “man” means something different from “a man.”
And that is not even touching on the role of the Son, fully God and fully man, in he process.