B
Brenda_V
Guest
But no coat racks.
Catholics can rejoice that the infamous and heretical “Protestant coat rack” has not impinged upon the Catholic Church…yet. (Bwoo ha ha!)
Brenda V.
But no coat racks.
Catholics can rejoice that the infamous and heretical “Protestant coat rack” has not impinged upon the Catholic Church…yet. (Bwoo ha ha!)
Actually, there are plenty of evangelical varieties of Methodists, Lutherans and Anglicans which do keep liturgical practices, including the use of altar servers (called “acolytes” outside the Catholic Church) and using the term “Eucharist”. These are no longer considered part of so-called “mainline” Protestantism (see the most recent Pew study on religions in America: religions.pewforum.org/affiliations) as their actual beliefs are more in line with evangelicalism.Since when do Protestant churches, at least of the evangelical variety, have altar girls OR boys!!! Or the “Eucharist?” Or “liturgy?”
The mainlines (which are getting smaller every year) are getting away from these traditions, and the evangelical/Pentecostal/fundamental Protestant churches, which include the majority of Protestants in the U.S., never had these things.
Non-sequitur. This thread is more about the loss of Catholic identity via the introduction of Protestant innovations.Keep in mind that the mainline churches–the ones who used liturgy and other traditions that they borrowed from the Catholic Church–are the churches that first began teaching (back in the 1960s and 1970s) such sinfjul teachings as “homosexual pastors,” “homosexual marriages,” “the myth of the resurrection,” “hell does not exist,” “the devil does not exist,” “Jesus was just a good man”, “abortion rights,” etc.
But neither have the mainline Protestant liturgical churches yet fallen into those kinds of very basic errors. And the non-liturgical evangelicals/Pentecostals/fundamentalists and the evangelical liturgical churches mentioned above follow other extremely heretical beliefs such as once-saved-always-saved and sola scriptura.The evangelical/Pentecostal/fundamental churches which have rejected liturgy and the “traditions of man” have, for the most part, not fallen into error when it comes to the basic doctrines of Christianity (Deity of Christ, Trinity, Heaven and Hell, resurrection, etc.).
I think what you have demonstrated - inadvertently - is that when any part of Catholic identity is jettisoned, then errors will inevitably creep in. Liturgy + Sacred Scripture + Sacred Tradition = Truth. Remove any of these elements then the equation has a different outcome.I’m not saying we should jettison liturgy and tradition. What I’m saying is that it is no guarantee of heresy-free churches.
Removing kneelers from parishesIn homilies, priests never speak of Purgatory - ever.
greeting each other during Mass…
In homilies, priests also never address how erroneous the once-saved-always-saved doctrine is… or the prosperity doctrine… etc…
Boldface mine–oh,my, I do not agree with this at all. Is this really what you wanted to write or is it a mistype?Actually, there are plenty of evangelical varieties of Methodists, Lutherans and Anglicans which do keep liturgical practices, including the use of altar servers (called “acolytes” outside the Catholic Church) and using the term “Eucharist”. These are no longer considered part of so-called “mainline” Protestantism (see the most recent Pew study on religions in America: religions.pewforum.org/affiliations) as their actual beliefs are more in line with evangelicalism.
Non-sequitur. This thread is more about the loss of Catholic identity via the introduction of Protestant innovations.
But neither have the mainline Protestant liturgical churches yet fallen into those kinds of very basic errors. And the non-liturgical evangelicals/Pentecostals/fundamentalists and the evangelical liturgical churches mentioned above follow other extremely heretical beliefs such as once-saved-always-saved and sola scriptura.
I think what you have demonstrated - inadvertently - is that when any part of Catholic identity is jettisoned, then errors will inevitably creep in. Liturgy + Sacred Scripture + Sacred Tradition = Truth. Remove any of these elements then the equation has a different outcome.
I can agree that coat racks would be at least as big a problem as the other “problems” complained of on this thread.But no coat racks.
Catholics can rejoice that the infamous and heretical “Protestant coat rack” has not impinged upon the Catholic Church…yet. (Bwoo ha ha!)
Help out a poor, Anglican. Cat, could you explain this inside joke?But no coat racks.
Catholics can rejoice that the infamous and heretical “Protestant coat rack” has not impinged upon the Catholic Church…yet. (Bwoo ha ha!)
The website for the United Methodists (umc.org/site/c.lwL4KnN1LtH/b.2299859/k.13B7/Our_Christian_Roots.htm) doesn’t teach what you heard that pastor preach. Sounds like she’s gone off on her own path - but that’s not uncommon these days, unfortunately. There are Catholic priests who do the same thing - but in any case, most of the mainline organizations are not preaching these heresies; it’s rogues in the organization. (Note I say “most” here. There are exceptions.)Just a few months ago I attended a United Methodist Church (mainline)–my parents in law’s church–and I posted on this board the heretical teaching that the pastor presented in her sermon. She actually stated that Jesus was created by God the Father. And that “the Word” spoken of in John 1 means “peace, love, or joy,” not Jesus Christ, God.
You can check out the websites of many of the mainline denominations and read for yourself the sin that these church present as “good.”
I totally agree with you about the UCC; they’re nearly as bad as the Unitarian Universalists these days.The United Church of Christ is especially heinous. They teach that the resurrection is “symbolic,” not real.
Perhaps this is the case for the Masses you attend, I hear Purgatory and Hell preached about in homilies.In homilies, priests never speak of Purgatory - ever.
You’d have hated going to Mass in the early Church, they exchanged a KISS, not a handshake like now.greeting each other during Mass….
A homily is not time to teach in depth on apologetics and what is taught by protestants, that is why we have classes and lectures and study groups.In homilies, priests also never address how erroneous the once-saved-always-saved doctrine is… or the prosperity doctrine… etc…
That just really reminds me of this:Clapping DURING mass along with the music…![]()
The reason is that it is a different vocation. I have worked in diaconcate formation and I would say that 99.9% of the men had no clue they were going to have a call to the diaconate when they were younger. They had a call to marriage and later on discoverd the call to further serve God as a deacon. Perhaps some felt a pull toward the priesthood as a youth but discerened that God wanted them to marry. I have never ever met a deacon who said “No, I am not going to be a priest, I’ll get married and be a deacon.” It doesn’t work that way. The diaconte also is not meant as a solution to the lack of priestly vocations. It is a return to the ancient order of deacons,which was not necessarily a step to the priesthood. Also, in reality, there are very few things that a deacons can to that a lay person cannot do (although some may be only in exceptional cirumstances). So a call to the diaconate is a call to Holy Orders but not to priesthood, as there are many more things a priest can do that a deacon cannot. It is a completely different order.In my opinion there is a big difference between the end result of a permanent married deacon, and a transitional deacon as one of the steps resulting in ordination to the priesthood. Why be a priest when you can be a married deacon? Hopefully, the Church will put an end to the proliferation of married deacons as a perceived solution to the lack of priestly vocations. What if we end up ten years from now with a ratio of 95% married deacons to 5% priests?
Excellent!I think what you have demonstrated - inadvertently - is that when any part of Catholic identity is jettisoned, then errors will inevitably creep in. Liturgy + Sacred Scripture + Sacred Tradition = Truth. Remove any of these elements then the equation has a different outcome.
I agree & will add one more thing. I’ve seen too many deacons give erroneous information, especially on the internet, while using their title to lend authority to their statements.**In my opinion there is a big difference between the end result of a permanent married deacon, and a transitional deacon as one of the steps resulting in ordination to the priesthood. **Why be a priest when you can be a married deacon? Hopefully, the Church will put an end to the proliferation of married deacons as a perceived solution to the lack of priestly vocations. What if we end up ten years from now with a ratio of 95% married deacons to 5% priests?
Greeting during the Mass, if you are referring to the shaking of hands (peace greeting), this is not a Protestant invention, but an ancient part of the Mass that comes from the earliest Christians. It used to be with a kiss, but later evolved into a handshake - since this is a cultural thing as well as a Christian thing, there is nothing wrong with that change - the intent is the same.In homilies, priests never speak of Purgatory - ever.
greeting each other during Mass…
In homilies, priests also never address how erroneous the once-saved-always-saved doctrine is… or the prosperity doctrine… etc…