S
SkyLandSea
Guest
Hi everyone.
I visited St. Michael’s Cathedral in Toronto, Canada this weekend. A beautiful cathedral with stunning art and architecture!
I went in expecting to find images of Michael the archangel everywhere, but I was surprised to find only one of him, a lovely painting at the rear of the church. However there was a proliferation of St. Marys, Annes, Peters, and others, as paintings, statues, everywhere. Michael has the rack of votive candles below it so he’s as venerable as the others, but I wondered why his presence is quite inconspicuous in a church named for him.
What is the traditional procedure for choosing the saint for a church to be named? I take from my experience that the selection of a saint doesn’t necessarily mean the Church will majorly venerate or house images of that particular saint?
I visited St. Michael’s Cathedral in Toronto, Canada this weekend. A beautiful cathedral with stunning art and architecture!
I went in expecting to find images of Michael the archangel everywhere, but I was surprised to find only one of him, a lovely painting at the rear of the church. However there was a proliferation of St. Marys, Annes, Peters, and others, as paintings, statues, everywhere. Michael has the rack of votive candles below it so he’s as venerable as the others, but I wondered why his presence is quite inconspicuous in a church named for him.
What is the traditional procedure for choosing the saint for a church to be named? I take from my experience that the selection of a saint doesn’t necessarily mean the Church will majorly venerate or house images of that particular saint?