National Academies book on evolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter surgei
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone with a basic elementary school level of knowledge should be able to understand the question I posed without attempting to change the topic.
You claimed that evolution has little to do with pre-life conditions. This assumes that you know what pre-life conditions were and how they contributed to the origin of life in the first place.

So again, how do you know that pre-life conditions did not have a profound impact on how evolutionary processes emerged? What were those conditions, how did they create life, and why does this not have any influence on the origin and development of evolutionary processes?
They may have, but that’s not part of “the standard evolutionary story” It’s not part of evolutionary theory or the study of evolution, any more then a cook is necessarily a farmer.
By the way, you’re mentioning required educational levels here (and implying that I do not possess them), so what are your scientific qualifications?
:rolleyes: Clearly better then yours in the topic at hand.
 
When a _____is a _____is a philosophical question, not a scientific one
baby = _____
_____ = man
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top