Nature of Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter jpr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jpr

Guest
Why does the “liberal” wing of the Catholic Church seem to be so fixated on changing the accepted understanding of the nature of the Eucharist? Transubstantiated seems to have fallen out of favor. They prefer to speak of the Eucharist as “event”, something that requires the faithful to do something in order to complete. Transignification, transfinalization (at least the ideas behind them) are the current favorites.
Thanks for any reply you may have.
jpr
 
It is just an opinion mind you, but I think some people tend to see themselves as the primary reason for the Mass itself. Since they want to feel good about themselves, because after all they are good people, they don’t want to have anything that really distracts from that experience. For a lot of them, not all mind you, this is not an attack, just an observation, the Mass is their opportunity to show off if you will. To many of them Mass is for the glorification of the congregation itself rather than the glory of God. Mass is a place to relax, socialize, have a good time, maybe put on a show etc. They don’t want to hear about sin or suffering or penance or anything at all like that. No mean spirited or judgemental homilies or doctrines.

I have heard Catechism teachers talk about the Eucharist and say that the congregation is the Eucharist and without the congregation participating fully, the Eucharist does not exist . In essence, you are the Eucharist and so is the person beside you. So since the Eucharist is the body of Christ, guess what? Thats right, you are Christ, so worship yourself as well as the person next to you.

I hate to have to say that but in a lot of parishes, it is true.
 
Palmas85

Thanks for the reply, and I think your right. Sorry I couldn’t get back to this sooner, but sometimes 'life" catches up to me.
Our Bishop is constantly referring to the Eucharist as an “Event” in the life of the community, and warns us not to see it as a “body” encased in the tabernacle. His liberal theology shows up here with a vengence. Very discouraging.
Thanks
jpr
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top