Navarre Bible Commentary on this Sunday's Readings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fidelis
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Fidelis

Guest
FIRST READING: Ezekiel 2: 2-5.

EXPLANATION: Ezekiel, one of the four major prophets of the Old Testament, carried out his office of God’s mouthpiece to the Chosen, People from 593-571 B.C. In 597 he was among the nobles of Judah carried into exile by Nabuchadnezzar of Babylon, together with king Jehoiakim. Some four years after his arrival in Babylon, God appointed him to speak to his fellow-exiles. The burden of his preaching was that Judah had brought this exile on herself by her infidelity to Yahweh, her God. Worse was still to come. Jerusalem and its temple, which had been desecrated by unworthy priests, would be razed to the ground. Judah would cease to exist as a nation and all the able bodied people would be taken as slaves to Babylon. As he, and Jeremiah also, had foretold: all of this happened in 587.

Then in the latter half of his ministry, he began to console the exiles and to promise them that, having undergone their just punishment, they would be restored to their homeland. A new Jerusalem and a new temple would be built. The people, purified by the exile, would serve God with a new heart and a new spirit. The heart of stone, which they had up to now, would be replaced by a heart of flesh (see 11: 18-19). This part of the prophecy was not completely fulfilled until the coming of Christianity. The verses taken from Ezekiel today, treat of his appointment as prophet—God’s representative—among the exiles in Babylon. (Source: Catholic Matters)

**From: Ezekiel 2:2-5

The Prophet’s mission
---------------------------------**
[2] And when he spoke to me, the Spirit entered into me and set me upon my feet; and I heard him speaking to me. [3] And he said to me, "Son of man, I send you to the people of Israel, to a nation of rebels, who have rebelled against me; they and their fathers have transgressed against me to this very day. [4] The people also are impudent and stubborn: I send you to them; and you shall say to them, ‘Thus says the Lord God.’ [5] And whether they ear or refuse to hear (for they are a rebellious house) they will know that there has been a prophet among them.

Commentary: *

**2:1-3:3. ** The vision by the river Chebar is all about the grandeur and glory of God, who is sovereign over all things; whereas the account given of the call of Ezekiel tells us about the prophet and about the people of Israel, for whom the message is meant. The prophet is described as a son of man, whom the Spirit moves, a prophet among the people; and they are a rebellious people. The account takes the form of an address by the Lord containing a command to pass his word on to the people (2: 1-7) and a symbolic action in which Ezekiel eats the scroll given to him by God (2:8-3:3).

**2:1. **“Son of man”: this title is used repeatedly in these opening chapters. It occurs later on, too, more than ninety times; but it has special significance here, which is the first time it is used. Because Ezekiel is living in exile in a foreign and therefore unclean country, he cannot be given grand titles. He is an ordinary mortal, one creature among many, on an infinitely lower level than the Lord; one more among his people, like them an exile, a person brought low, but also someone who has hope in his heart. St Gregory the Great explains the title like this: “He is brought up often into heaven and his soul rejoices at great and beautiful mysteries which remain invisible to us. But it is fitting that he be called “son of man” while he contemplates those hidden wonders, so that he will not forget who he is or glory in the splendour that has been revealed to him” (“Homiliae in Ezechielem prophetam”, 1, 12, 22).

**2:2. ** “The Spirit set me upon my feet”. In the vision of God’s glory, the word “spirit” has three meanings. It is a natural thing – a stormy wind, breath, spirit (1:4; cf. 13:11). From this comes the second meaning: “spirit” is an inner, superhuman strength which guides the actions of living creatures and cherubim, deciding when they should move and where they should go (cf. 1:12, 20, 21). But in the account of the call of Ezekiel, “spirit” has a third meaning: it is life-force, reminiscent of the “breath of life” that God breathed into man at the moment of creation (cf. Gen 2:7); this meaning will be seen more clearly in the vision of the bones brought back to life (cf. 37:5, 6, 8, 10). As a life-force, every time that the spirit affects Ezekiel, it is to ‘‘set him on his feet’’ (cf. 2:1; 3:20), to “lift him up’’ (cf. 3:12, 14, 24), so that he is better able to hear the word of God and to see what is happening in the temple of Jerusalem cf. 8:3; 11:1; 43:5) or in Babylon (cf. 11:24). It is therefore an inner energy that transforms the prophet and helps him to hear or see things that he could not if left on his own, for he is a mere “son of man”.

**2:3. ** Israel is a “nation of rebels” or, as it is put a little further on in the text, a “rebellious house” (2:8). The book defines the people of Israel in this negative way (cf. 2:5, 6, 8; 3:9) because it sums up the sinful history of their forebears and their own hostility towards God. Their rebelliousness involves arrogance towards God, rejection of his commandments, and refusal to listen to what he says. It makes them stubborn: one can even see it in their faces. Time and again Ezekiel tells them that their sin is grave, for they have freely chosen to adopt this attitude. They “will not listen to you”, the Lord says to Ezekiel, “for they are not willing to listen to me” (3:7). Precisely because sin requires a free act of the will, the prophet puts special emphasis on personal responsibility. Each individual will be punished for his or her sins, not for those of their forebears (cf. 18:1 32). Because the people are so rebellious, God wants the prophet to he especially docile: “Do not be rebellious” (2:8). The Lord asks him to listen carefully to the word of God and to accept it joyfully. The gesture of eating the scroll shows what docility requires. Even though the scroll contains “words of lamentation and mourning and woe” (2:10), the prophet will find it “sweet as honey” when he does what he is told.

2:4. “Thus says the Lord God”: this makes it clear that the prophet is not speaking on his own behalf. It is usually termed a “messenger formula” (words a messenger uses to preface his message), and occurs often in other prophetical books, particularly Isaiah and Jeremiah. However, in Ezekiel, where it appears almost 130 times, the name of God is reinforced (“Lord God”), to signal the infinite majesty of the Lord who speaks with full authority. The people’s stubbornness in rejecting God’s word is an act of rebellion, and the docility shown by the prophet is an almost obligatory act of submission. Ezekiel never resists the voice of the Lord, never raises any personal objection or difficulty unlike Isaiah and Jeremiah. On the contrary, knowing that he is passing on a divine message, not inventing one of his own, he must do this bravely, and never flag, even if the people refuse to listen (cf. 2:6-7; 3:11). “True prophets are those who say the words that God has spoken to them; the prophet of God is the one who delivers the words of God to men who cannot or do not deserve to understand God himself” (St Augustine, “Quaestiones in Heptateuchum”, 2, 17).

2:5. “They will know that there has been a prophet among them”: a formal confirmation that Ezekiel is indeed a prophet. At a time when there was no king (for he was the prisoner of Nebuchadnezzar) and no temple (for it had been profaned and destroyed) and no social or religious institutions among the Jews, prophets acquired increased status. The prophet was God’s only representative among the people; he was the only one with authority to demand that they listen to his message.

Source
 
SECOND READING: 2 Corinthians 12:7-10.

**EXPLANATION: **St. Paul preached the Gospel in Corinth for eighteen months (50-52 A.D.), and founded a flourishing church there. He left for Jerusalem and returned via Antioch to visit the churches founded in Asia Minor and Greece. While he was away from Corinth some “intruders,” some other self-appointed preachers, had come there and were upsetting the Christians. They evidently were belittling Paul and boasting of their own superior qualifications. In this letter, which Paul sends to the Corinthians from Ephesus or Macedonia (about 57 A.D.), he feels forced to prove that he was a true Apostle: who suffered much for Christ and his Gospel and who also had been given the privilege of special visions and revelations. He devotes chapters 10 to 12: 6 to this subject. As if to make atonement for speaking so boastfully about himself, he goes on now to describe some weakness he had which troubled him very much. He prayed fervently to have it removed, but was told by the Lord that he would get the grace necessary to bear with it. He concludes that he is content with weakness and sufferings because the power and strength of Christ, working through a weak instrument, will be all the more visible and convincing.
(Source: Catholic Matters)

**From: 2 Corinthians 12:7-10

Visions and Revelations
-----------------------**
[7] And to keep me from being too elated by the abundance of revelations, a thorn was given me in the flesh, a messenger of Satan, to harass me, to keep me from being too elated. [8] Three times I besought the Lord about this, that it should leave me; [9] but he said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” I will all the more gladly boast of my weaknesses, that the power of Christ may rest upon me. [10] For the sake of Christ, then, I am content with weaknesses, insults, hardships, persecutions, and calamities; for when I am weak, then I am strong.

Commentary:*

1-10. He continues his apologia by referring to visions and revelations he has received from the Lord. From other letters and from the Acts of the Apostles we know that there were many of these in the course of his life (cf. Acts 9:1-8; 16:9; 18:9f; 22:17-21; 27:23f; 1 Cor 15:8; Gal 1:12); but he refers to only one of them.

The Apostle couches this account in the third person–“a man in Christ”–possibly because he feels embarrassed (vv. 1, 5) to have to reveal these graces God has given him. Therefore, after describing these visions briefly (vv. 1-6), he speaks about the weakness the Lord has allowed him to have, to prevent him from taking pride in these wonderful experiences (vv. 7-10).

“Fourteen years ago”: that is, in the period 43-44, possibly during his stay in Tarsus (cf. Acts 9:30), Antioch (Acts 11:25ff; 13:1-3) or Jerusalem (Acts 11:30).

7-10. Displaying admirable humility, St Paul now refers to the weakness God allowed him to experience to ensure his supernatural gifts did not make him proud. It is impossible to say what exactly the “thorn in his flesh” was. Some Fathers–St Augustine, for example–and modern commentators think that it was some particularly painful and humiliating physical ailment, possibly the same one as he refers to in Galatians 4:13f, where he also speaks in general terms. Others, like St John Chrysostom, are of the view that he is referring to the pain which continual persecution caused him. Others–from St Gregory the Great onwards–opt for an ascetical interpretation; they say he is referring to temptations to do with conscience; but the supporters of the two other theses argue, for example, that it is unlikely that St Paul would have mentioned anything of that kind, because it could have given his enemies ammunition for further attacks.

St Paul asked God to take this “thorn” away, but the heavenly answer he received is very revealing: God’s grace is enough to enable him to cope with this difficulty–which serves to reveal God’s power. And so it is that he boasts of and is content with his weaknesses and the persecution he suffers: in these circumstances he is stronger than ever, thanks to God’s supernatural help.

When commenting on this passage, St Thomas explains that God sometimes permits certain kinds of evil in order to draw out greater good: for example, in order to protect people from pride–the root of all vices–he sometimes allows his chosen ones to be humiliated by an illness, or a defect, or even by mortal sin, in order that “the person who is humbled in this way might recognize that he cannot stand firm by his own efforts alone. Hence it is said in Romans 8:28, ‘We know that in everything God works for good with those who love him’–not of course that God seeks the sin but [the sinner’s] turning to him” (“Commentary on 2 Cor, ad loc.”).

7. “A messenger of Satan”, an angel of Satan: this is how he describes the humiliating “thorn”. This suggests that the disability could have been seen as an obstacle to his work of evangelization–which the devil, logically, would have been keen to frustrate (cf. 2:11; 11:14f).

****8-10. Christians can learn a great deal about the ascetical struggle from these words. They remind us, on the one hand, of the need to ask the Lord to help us when we experience difficulties, and at the same time to be full of trust and to abandon ourselves to God, who knows what is best for us. “The Lord is good”, St Jerome teaches, “because he often does not give us what we desire, in order to give us something we would prefer” (“Epist. ad Paulinum”).

The passage also shows us what attitude we should take to our own weakness: “We have to glory”, St Alphonsus says, “in the knowledge of our own weakness in order to acquire the strength of Jesus Christ, which is holy humility”, without “giving in to lack of confidence, as the devil wants, and falling into more serious sins” (“Treasury of Preaching Material”, II, 6).

At the same time this passage teaches us that awareness of our personal shortcomings should lead us to put all our trust in God: “We have to cry out ceaselessly with a strong and humble faith, 'Lord, put not your trust in me. But I, I put my trust in you. ’ Then, as we sense in our hearts the love, the compassion, the tenderness of Christ’s gaze upon us (for he never abandons us) we shall come to understand the full meaning of those words of St Paul, “virtus in infirmitate perficitur” (2 Cor 12:9). If we have faith in our Lord, in spite of our failings–or rather, with our failings–we shall be faithful to our Father, God; his divine power will shine forth in us, sustaining us in our weakness” ([St] J. Escriva, “Friends of God”, 194).​

Source
 
**GOSPEL: **Mark 6:1-6.

EXPLANATION: According to St. Mark in this gospel episode, Jesus had been preaching and working miracles in Galilee for many months. He had spent most of the time in towns and villages around the Sea of Galilee. Before leaving Galilee he paid a visit to his home town Nazareth where he was to meet with disappointment. He went into the synagogue on the sabbath day and began to preach there. His fellow-townsmen had heard of the extraordinary miracles he had worked around the other towns of Galilee; they had also heard of the huge crowds that listened to his preaching. Many of those who now heard him for the first time in their own synagogue, were astonished at his wisdom and learning. Where did he get it, he had not studied to be a rabbi and how did he work the miracles they had heard about? All these years they knew him. What was he but the local carpenter? They knew his mother and his relatives, he could not be the Messiah or anyone extraordinary. They began by being astonished at his preaching but they ended up by shutting their eyes to the truth and refusing to believe that he could be what others thought and said he was; he was their neighbor and they therefore knew better.

The reply of Jesus to their unbelief was to quote the saying for them: “a prophet is not without honor except in his own country.” The rejection of Jesus as Messiah by his neighbors of Nazareth was a foreshadowing of his rejection by the leaders of the nation, which was to come later and for the same reason-unbelief.
(Source: Catholic Matters)

From: Mark 6:1-6

No Prophet Is Honored In His Own Country
----------------------------------------**
[1] He (Jesus) went away from there and came to His own country; and His disciples followed Him. [2] And on the Sabbath He began to teach in the synagogue; and many who heard Him were astonished saying, “Where did this man get all this? What is the wisdom given to Him? What mighty works are wrought by His hands! [3] Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judah and Simon, and are not His sisters here with us?” And they took offense at Him. [4] And Jesus said to them, “A prophet is not without honor, except in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house.” [5] And He could do no mighty work there, except that He laid His hands upon a few sick people and healed them. [6] And He marvelled because of their unbelief.
*

Commentary:*

1-3. Jesus is here described by His occupation and by the fact that He is the son of Mary. Does this indicate that St. Joseph is dead already? We do not know, but it is likely. In any event, the description is worth underlining: in the Gospels of St. Matthew and St. Luke we are told of the virginal conception of Jesus. St. Mark’s Gospel does not deal with our Lord’s infancy, but there may be an allusion here to His virginal conception and birth, in His being described as “the son of Mary.”

“Joseph, caring for the Child as he had been commanded, made Jesus a craftsman, transmitting his own professional skill to him. So the neighbors of Nazareth will call Jesus both “faber” and “fabri filius”: the craftsman and the son of the craftsman” ([St] J. Escriva, “Christ Is Passing By”, 55). This message of the Gospel reminds us that our vocation to work is not marginal to God’s plans.

“The truth that by means of work man participates in the activity of God Himself, his Creator, was ‘given particular prominence by Jesus Christ’–the Jesus at whom many of His first listeners in Nazareth ‘were astonished, saying, "Where did this man get all this? What is the wisdom given to Him?.. Is not this the carpenter?’” (Mark 6:23). For Jesus not only proclaimed but first and foremost fulfilled by His deeds the ‘Gospel’, the word of eternal Wisdom, that had been entrusted to Him. Therefore this was also ‘the gospel of work’, because ‘He who proclaimed it was Himself a man of work’, a craftsman like Joseph of Nazareth (cf. Matthew 13:55). And if we do not find in His words a special command to work–but rather on one occasion a prohibition against too much anxiety about work and life–(Matthew 6:25-34)–at the same time the eloquence of the life of Christ is unequivocal: He belongs to the `working world’, He has appreciation and respect for human work. It can indeed be said the ‘He looks with love upon human work’ and the different forms that it takes, seeing in each one of these forms a particular facet of man’s likeness with God, the Creator and Father" (John Paul II, “Laborem Exercens”, 26).

St. Mark mentions by name a number of brothers of Jesus, and refers in general to His sisters. But the word “brother” does not necessarily mean son of the same parents. It can also indicate other degrees of relationship–cousins, nephews, etc. Thus in Genesis 13:8 and 14:14 and 16 Lot is called the brother of Abraham (translated as “kinsman” in RSV), whereas we know that he was Abraham’s nephew, the son of Abraham’s brother Haran. The same is true of Laban, who is called the brother of Jacob (Genesis 29:15) although he was his mother’s brother (Genesis 29:15); there are other instances: cf. 1 Chronicles 23:21-22, etc. This confusion is due to the poverty of Hebrew and Aramaic language: in the absence of distinct terms, the same word, brother, is used to designate different degrees of relationship.

From other Gospel passages we know that James and Joses, who are mentioned here, were sons of Mary of Clophas (John 19:25). We know less about Judas and Simon: it seems that they are the Apostles Simon the Cananaean (Matthew 10:4) and Judas the son of James (Luke 6:16), the author of the Catholic Epistle, in which he describes himself as “brother” of James. In any event, although James, Simon and Judas are referred to as brothers of Jesus, it is nowhere said they were “sons of Mary”–which would have been the natural thing if they had been our Lord’s brothers in the strict sense. Jesus always appears as an only son: to the people of Nazareth, He is “the son of Mary” (Matthew 13:55). When He was dying Jesus entrusted His mother to St. John (cf. John 19:26-27), which shows that Mary had no other children. To this is added the constant belief of the Church, which regards Mary as the ever-virgin: “a perfect virgin before, while, and forever after she gave birth” (Paul IV, “Cum Quorumdam”).

**5-6. **Jesus worked no miracles here: not because He was unable to do so, but as punishment for the unbelief of the townspeople. God wants man to use the grace offered him, so that, by cooperating with grace, he become disposed to receive further graces. As St. Augustine neatly puts it, “He who made you without your own self, will not justify you without yourself” (“Sermon” 169).​

Source
 
[6] And He marvelled because of their unbelief. (Mark 6:6)

Apparently, Jesus was astonished at either people who did not believe in him, or who did believe in him.

10 **When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, "Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such faith. ** (Matthew 8:10)

"No man can come to me, except the Father, who hath sent me, draw him: and I will raise him up in the last day." (John 6:44)

God’s peace.
 
[6] And He marvelled because of their unbelief. (Mark 6:6)

Apparently, Jesus was astonished at either people who did not believe in him, or who did believe in him.

10 **When Jesus heard this, he marveled and said to those who followed him, "Truly, I tell you, with no one in Israel have I found such faith. ** (Matthew 8:10)

"No man can come to me, except the Father, who hath sent me, draw him: and I will raise him up in the last day." (John 6:44)

God’s peace.
I thought it was interesting too that the passage started out by noting that “the people were amazed at his teaching” and it ends with Jesus being astonished by their unbelief.
 
thanks.

I’m a bit too conservative to jump into the expensive Navarre commentary, so this is a good peak at them.

Am I wrong to say that most of these comments are at the literal sense of the text?
 
thanks.

I’m a bit too conservative to jump into the expensive Navarre commentary, so this is a good peak at them.

Am I wrong to say that most of these comments are at the literal sense of the text?
Like all good Catholic Bible commentaries, it starts at the literal sense, but also includes the other senses as well.

You can subscribe for free at the website linked above to get commentaries from the Navarre Bible on the daily and Sunday readings by e-mail.
 
“How is it possible that they do not recognize the light of Truth? Why are they not open to the goodness of God, who has willed to share our humanity? In fact, the man Jesus of Nazareth is God made visible; in Him, God dwells fully. And while we too always seek other signs, other wonders, we do not realize that the He is the real sign, God made flesh; He is the greatest miracle of the universe: all the love of God hidden in a human heart, in a human face.” - Pope Benedict XVI commenting on Sunday’s Gospel
 
Question:
yes… wondering how I get to the present "Commentary on this Sunday’s readings … this coming Sunday???
THANKS
Fr. Will
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top