L
LatinCat
Guest
You are probably correct. That is what the coloquial term means. For that reason, I tend to be a bit forgiving when secular media accuses Christians of Worshiping things. But that does not make us Idoloters. To be an Idol worshiper is to put something, anything in the place of God. But Christians do not believe anything is to be put in the place of God. We distinguish betweent the honor due a created thing and the honor due the Creator himself. For god we say the type of honor due is Latria (Worship) and the type of honor due to relics and saints is Dulia (veneration). We would call it gravely sinful to give Latria to anything but God. In times past, the word “Worship” was used to describe the honor due to anything or anyone. It was not used the way it is coloquially used today to describe only the honor due to God. One example of this is the enlish use, when one calls a person worthy of honor, “your worship”. They most certainly do not intend to refer to such persons with Latria. It is just that the word worship had a broader meaning in the past. So we come to the problem of defining terms. For some, “worship” means the honor due to anything. For some “worship” means the honor due to religious things only. For some “worship” means the honor due to God alone. I guess when we are discussing such things, we all need to clarify what we mean. Do we mean “Latria”, “dulia”, or both?OK. From that explanation, I’d say you might be using the word “worship” in a more limited manner than found in common usage. People might understand exactly what you are doing, and that falls under the common usage of worship.
I suspect this problem will continue until the word “worship” either spawns a few other more precise words, or until its meaning in common usage changes.