First of all, the most important duty a priest has is to offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. That is what he is ordained to do. It is a point that Redemptionis Sacramentum brings up:
If you can, make an effort to attend your diocese’s Chrism Mass, wherein the Bishop concelebrates this liturgy with his priests. Their promises, which they renew at this Mass, center on their fidelity to the celebration of the Holy Sacrifice.
Furthermore, lest we forget that the Second Vatican Council’s Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy states that the Mass is the source and summit of the Church’s life. Therefore, the Mass is the most important prayer of the Church and it is the most important activity that we do. Everything else flows from the Mass.
The ecclesial movements are good facets of the Church, but, they are not the end all and be all. They are not essential to our salvation, but, if done properly, they can certainly be of great assistance.
Your answer is somewhat non-responsive to my post. Priests are ordained to assist their bishop, as the bishop is not able to carry out his functions entirely alone. Their first call is not to be a dispenser of sacraments, their first call is to evangelize. That the Mass is the sum and summit of the Church I have no question about. The Mass is perfect evangelization, in case you didn’t notice.
I have attended probably every one of the last 15 chrism Masses as I have been involved with RCIA that long. I am well aware of what it is about.
I made no suggestion that ecclesial movements are anything but a help in the road to salvation. Nor do I make any suggestions that they are an end all or a be all. I suggest that they are legitimate means of assisting people in the growth of their faith.
The pastor the OP refers to seems to be much more inclined to the rational, and although we are limited only to the OP’s observations, seems to almost indicate a fear of anything that might involve the emotional. I do not suggest that emotional should drive our faith, or be the basis of our faith. I do suggest that an emotional response to what we are taught can be the spark that causes faith to grow, and grow tremendously.
I have attended both Cursillo and Emmaeus retreats; I know the impact they have had on me, and I have seen the impact they have had on others who have attended those retreats. I have seen people move from Sunday morning bench warmers to people who “get it”; they are on fire for Christ. they sort of scare those who take a rational approach to faith, and seem to want to quantify everything, to approach all as if it were simply a matter of logical arguement: QED, and there is your certified, stamped on the forehead and permanently marked on the soul Catholic Christian.
Christianity is a bit more than apologetics; that is not to denigrate apologetics, but it is not the sum and summit of faith expression either. I am sorry that the pastor cannot seem to find a way to incoporate his approach into what else had been going on in the parish, rather than simply incoporating his approach and canceling others.
He is not there to simply say Mass and hear confessions, do amarriage and a baptism and anoint the sick. He is there to lead others to Christ first and foremost. To say that he is simply there to “do” sacraments is to buy into the liberal denigration of priesthood. I do not suggest that you would hold such a postion; but I don’t think you understood what I was responding to.