F
ffg
Guest
Thanks for the reply.If you look at my posts, I said nothing about the mormon’s should be OK with what happened.
While nobody is arguing the OP was respectful in his rant, he is getting some “atta boys” so to speak, and that is something I have a problem with. To me, that is condoning inappropriate behavior.
I have never said his point was not valid. In fact, quite the contrary. I have stated that I disagree with everything the mormon espouses theologically. That being said, he could have politely left, and if anyone followed or questioned, let them have it outside. After all, he accepted the invitation, and was not being held hostage.
He could have also waited until they knocked on his door again, and he could have let them have it. It didn’t need to be done inside one of their “church” buildings.
With all that being said, the whole tone of this thread, including the OP was obvious he was looking to stir something up. (Not a very Christian thing to do) He very simply could have refused the invitation. Accepted, then called to decline later, or even just not shown up. The tantrum was not necessary.
I agree he was just trying to stir things up, It’s quite possible the event as described probably didn’t happen. Considering he could have had the same rant at his door.
The post I quoted in the last is why I asked about the OK’s, it was quite implied in building the invite to a house scenario.
It’s understandable to disagree with what he did (if actually done) that happens all the time. That doesn’t mean people who see it as a positive are ‘wrong’ or he was ‘wrong’. In the scenario presented to us, if 1 person decided to do a little more research for truth’s sake, I don’t see how that is not a good thing.
Coulda, shoulda, woulda, everyone is different, his reaction/ delivery wouldn’t be yours, fair enough, doesn’t mean he should be chastised.
He didn’t start teaching Catholicism, he questioned the teachings he heard. That happens all the time in RCIA.
A good argument is how you hash out truth, civil, or emotional.
Perhaps the key reason most of us would not be able to do what he ‘did’ is out of respect, rather than lack of guts.
Something that has worked it’s way into this thread which I thought would be interesting, is what it means to be Christian.
Christ himself was straight forward, unapologetic. I think there are a lot of people who like to argue that Christians should bend over backwards to not offend.
Truth IS offensive to humans that don’t know it. If I didn’t grow up in it, I would find this stuff pretty rude.
The Truth doesn’t care about human emotion.
Take care,